CI/CT Operations

Pakistanis want direct escalation from India, the Pakistan Army's popularity is at an all-time low. Everyone inside their country hates them, especially the Pashtuns, who make a huge chunk of the grunts in their army.

We will have to maintain a direct non-confrontational role while dismantling them from within. Which is precisely what is going on right now. They are getting dismantled through JKLF (yes the same JKLF) in PoK, the PTM movement in KP, the BLA/BLF movement in Baluchistan, and PTI's popularity in KPK and Punjab.

Someone is doing a very detailed, complicated operation in there.

No need to give them direct escalation, but this is high time and POJK has its own domestic problems.
 
Few days ago trts hideout was busted visual
In thease hide out they can't be detected by drones or thermals you have to send your forces on foot in which high chance trts will spot you first and will fire first that gives them advantage
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240913_230040_166.jpg
    IMG_20240913_230040_166.jpg
    555.7 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_20240913_230040_661.jpg
    IMG_20240913_230040_661.jpg
    375.3 KB · Views: 18
No need to give them direct escalation, but this is high time and POJK has its own domestic problems.

They have plenty of problems in POJK, the majority of them want to separate and form an independent state.

This is not idle boasting, go search 'Kashmir' in Urdu and check what local Kashmiris talk about Pakistan. The majority of them have become anti-Pakistan since May.
 

View: https://x.com/VJSWRITER/status/1834624924289208695

We are at the tipping point of gaining advantage over the terrorists.

when your leaders have this mindset , failure will be a surety. i don't think best army's round the globe will have this attitude. they will pour in everything to get success unlike ours just send in people to die again and again and again.

this is our standing in world, they are using such tech to find lost hikers and we can't use in military operations , this is not even a joke , it's betrayal against a country.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HLdiJAZNTM&ab_channel=TeledyneFLIR
 
Since Independence we have never fought any high casualty war.. None of our wars haven't crossed 4000 dead..
I don't think India can handle 10,000 dead in 5 months.. We are pretty cowardly for a country of 1.4 billion

But we can take 10,000 dead soldiers in 25 years..

None of the wars that India fought since independence lasted long enough to result in high casualties.

Besides having large casualties is not a symbol of bravado, but rather a lack of requisite skills, professionalism and technology. The US lost only about 2400 soldiers in the nearly two decades of Afghan war and only 4500 soldiers in Iraq invasion and post-invasion insurgencies. Contrast that with the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, the Russians lost anywhere between 150,000 to 700,000 soldiers in just two years alone.
 
None of the wars that India fought since independence lasted long enough to result in high casualties.

Besides having large casualties is not a symbol of bravado, but rather a lack of requisite skills, professionalism and technology. The US lost only about 2400 soldiers in the nearly two decades of Afghan war and only 4500 soldiers in Iraq invasion and post-invasion insurgencies. Contrast that with the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, the Russians lost anywhere between 150,000 to 700,000 soldiers in just two years alone.
American were fighting dudes with sandals and AK and not an regular forces
Meanwhile Russian and ukrainean are both regular conventional armies who have thier own airforce , armour , artillery , and other means
So no doubt casualty of Russian and ukrainean are higher by seeing intensity of war
 
Few days ago trts hideout was busted visual
In thease hide out they can't be detected by drones or thermals you have to send your forces on foot in which high chance trts will spot you first and will fire first that gives them advantage
There is always a technology. Issue is priority, if we hv jungles than we must concentrate on developing technologies. Why can't army ask drdo to work on these things.
 
None of the wars that India fought since independence lasted long enough to result in high casualties.

Besides having large casualties is not a symbol of bravado, but rather a lack of requisite skills, professionalism and technology. The US lost only about 2400 soldiers in the nearly two decades of Afghan war and only 4500 soldiers in Iraq invasion and post-invasion insurgencies. Contrast that with the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, the Russians lost anywhere between 150,000 to 700,000 soldiers in just two years alone.

Apples and oranges. The only comparison that US can make is the first Gulf War and that is truly a masterpiece but keep in mind that US forces were only in actual combat for 60 days and Iraq had no help whatsoever. And the Russians did have that kind of performance in the first 60 days of war in the Russian Ukraine conflict. They overtook an area the size of Iraq in less than 2-3 weeks and Ukraine would have fallen if it wasn't for that massive overwhelming support by NATO.

So be careful with that comparison.
 
There is always a technology. Issue is priority, if we hv jungles than we must concentrate on developing technologies. Why can't army ask drdo to work on these things.
I dont know what kind of tech could have been used because as i said even thermal would have failed to detect them
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top