- Joined
- Apr 22, 2025
- Messages
- 272
- Likes
- 938
has safran even helped in the audit? all the things is said was like available on internet, we all knew metallurgy and weight reduction is the problem, TET needs to be increased and creep strength needs to increased, coatings and cooling holesIn one of them navy books by GM Hiranandani.
There is a whole section where the navy wanted to buy torpedo tube launched anti ship missiles because the Piglets were going to get Harpoons from the US.
This was during the 80s-90s and we wanted for our Type 209 subs, the ((( Frenchman ))) was doing non-committal drama of maybe zhey will sell it to us with the contract for buying sous-marines from them( dalali for Scorpene going on since decades before ).
The missile in question was the Exocet
It ends with a lot of "GET IT IN WRITING" and after the writing they had to get it signed by the French, that they would sell missiles to IN without the pre-condition of buying french submarines.
i.e the Admirals of the day knew the proclivities of the French, so we can't say that the Forces/Baboodom/Dhotis ko chutiya banaya
TLDR the French are weasels, you need a good set of lawyers to make to contract with crisp language and strict penalties included so that they don't dance over it later on.
If muh help with Kaveri by Safran is legit, all the type of "help" needs to be specified and penalties also have to be specified
each and everything available, what input did they give? these forenmaal lobby aka chandigarh lobby needs to be executed
fuck burgerland, frenchfries and vodka
samosa best