DRDO and PSU's

[fire starter]

frequency selective surface carbon composite microwave absorber.

absorber had a loss characteristic of >10 dB over 6–18 GHz and >20 dB in the X band region.

 

[shade2]

Army to boost firepower with 70,000 new AK-203 rifles as part of Russia deal

With superior ergonomics, durability, and adaptability, the AK-203 delivers enhanced firepower, making it ideal for diverse combat scenarios, from counterterrorism operations to high-altitude warfare.

www.indiatoday.in

Patrakar has provided chronology of these rifles including AHHH IM IMPOOORTING and domestic production

The first batch of 70,000 AK-203 rifles was reportedly delivered to the Indian Army on January 25, 2022, though the date has not been officially confirmed. Licensed production of the rifles officially commenced in January 2023. Between May and July 2024, another batch of 35,000 rifles was delivered, marking a significant step in the indigenous manufacturing and supply of these advanced assault rifles to the Indian armed forces.

The Indian Army is set to receive 70,000 AK-203 assault rifles in 2025, followed by an additional one lakh units in 2026 under an arms deal with Russia, according to defence sources.

Need to pump up those numbers

 

[Charlie]

M777 is not made by BAE-UK.
BAE-UK was the one to come up with, you don't have the industrial base in UK to support these kinds of large scale defence production. Just a third of parts are made in BAE-UK, shipped to BAE-USA, rest of the parts are made and everything is assembled.

If Stryker is made in Canada, then how many Stryker are in service with the Canadian armed forces?
LAV-III is manufactured in Canada and Stryker is in USA. If we were buying LAV-III then there would have been no need to involve USA, but we're not.

NSM is a purely Norwegian design, so much so that even USA has to buy it for testing. Don't get so caught in things like "sabka malik ek/Soros/deep state" that you start missing factuality.

You're countering my point and then reinforcing the exact thing that I said

This was my whole point, that despite being a 200 years old institution people nowadays think "I even doubt current employee can even design a good enough mechanism or design...".
Which means there's something fundamentally wrong going on other than just capital.

you are right about BAE-US it’s completely different from BAE-UK

But strikers are built in London ON, comms and other RF testing done in Alberta at GD.

Stryker Armoured Combat Vehicle Family, United States of America

The Stryker Armoured Combat Vehicle is built for the US Army by GDLS based on the GDLS Canada LAV III 8×8 light armoured vehicle,

www.army-technology.com

View: https://youtu.be/vHoH3QRKMyA?si=vlOof3j3hP2zGkXk

Remember the Saudi Arabia deal ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/general-dynamics-canada-wins-10b-deal-with-saudi-arabia-1.2537934

The company, known by its acronym GDLS, is the manufacturer of the LAV III armoured vehicle Canada used in Afghanistan. It also makes similar Stryker armoured vehicles for the United States and bid with a larger, heavier model in the recently cancelled Canadian procurement of heavy armoured personnel carriers that would have been worth $2 billion for 108 vehicles, plus training and maintenance.

That’s why wion was bitching about striker

Has India applied brakes on Stryker armoured vehicle deal amid diplomatic row with Canada? Report claims...

The Stryker is an eight-wheel-drive combat vehicle developed by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada for the US. Talks have been ongoing for the Indian Army to procure the military equipment for some time but it looks like New Delhi is in no hurry to get back to the table and see the deal through

www.wionews.com

GD is quite invested in Canada more then other defence contractors

Nothing can be done without US blessing when it comes to Canada.

 

[shade2]

you are right about BAE-US it’s completely different from BAE-UK

But strikers are built in London ON, comms and other RF testing done in Alberta at GD.

Stryker Armoured Combat Vehicle Family, United States of America

The Stryker Armoured Combat Vehicle is built for the US Army by GDLS based on the GDLS Canada LAV III 8×8 light armoured vehicle,

www.army-technology.com

View: https://youtu.be/vHoH3QRKMyA?si=vlOof3j3hP2zGkXk

Remember the Saudi Arabia deal ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/general-dynamics-canada-wins-10b-deal-with-saudi-arabia-1.2537934

The company, known by its acronym GDLS, is the manufacturer of the LAV III armoured vehicle Canada used in Afghanistan. It also makes similar Stryker armoured vehicles for the United States and bid with a larger, heavier model in the recently cancelled Canadian procurement of heavy armoured personnel carriers that would have been worth $2 billion for 108 vehicles, plus training and maintenance.

That’s why wion was bitching about striker

Has India applied brakes on Stryker armoured vehicle deal amid diplomatic row with Canada? Report claims...

The Stryker is an eight-wheel-drive combat vehicle developed by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada for the US. Talks have been ongoing for the Indian Army to procure the military equipment for some time but it looks like New Delhi is in no hurry to get back to the table and see the deal through

www.wionews.com

GD is quite invested in Canada more then other defence contractors

Stryker infantry vehicle deal with U.S. progresses; Javelin missile to be demonstrated again

India considers procurement of Stryker infantry combat vehicles from the U.S. amid ongoing negotiations and defence deals.

www.thehindu.com

Stryker infantry vehicle deal with U.S. progresses; Javelin missile to be demonstrated again​

Stryker, manufactured by General Dynamics, has been evaluated in high altitude conditions of Ladakh last September-October and the report has subsequently been shared with the Army Headquarters for further action, according to the sources. The performance of the vehicles was demonstrated in high altitude conditions between 13,000 and 18,000 feet which also saw the testing of the Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM), two sources said. And given some shortcomings, last month a communication was sent and re-trials are now awaited anytime, the sources stated.

The Stryker with its double-V hull performed optimally, one of the sources said, adding that the Javelin’s performance was not at the optimum level, which was due to the vintage of the system that was sent and repeat trials are expected to validate that. India has already sent a communication to the U.S. side asking for repeat demonstration of the Javelin, another source said, and the schedule is being worked out.

The Indian Army has identified a key requirement for ATGMs mounted on infantry combat vehicles, several defence officials stated. However, the Stryker variant with the Javelin ATGM is under development and is expected to be demonstrated to India in the near future, it has been learnt.

The envisaged plan, according to sources, is the procurement of few hundred vehicles in two stages. Direct import of small number of Strykers in the first stage and license manufacture of a bulk of them, with some customisations, in India likely by defence public sector undertaking Bharat Earth Movers Limited (BEML).

 

[shade2]

@Blood+ nothing to laugh at brozzer, It's Over unironically


Also may BEML get privatized
I couldn't literally believe when months ago i read that BEML is lobbying Govt for Stryker just for but it's fucking true

 

[Charlie]

View: https://youtu.be/bDKfAnjR59o?si=2EADmuYfojAH7xky

As per this video Morocco placed their order for Apaches 4 months after we did. The GE F-404 TF was also similarly delayed. At this point it's quite clear the Biden administration was playing dirty.

Modi's due in Washington to meet Trump next week. Hopefully these issues are thrashed out & supplies resume pronto .

Well check the Taiwan deal they are more desperate for US weapons but Morocco orders are being filled even though Taiwan weapons were ordered much earlier.

Morocco is paying premium right now. Hence their orders are taking priority.

Sadly that’s the situation.

 

[Blood+]

@Blood+ nothing to laugh at brozzer, It's Over unironically


Also may BEML get privatized
I couldn't literally believe when months ago i read that BEML is lobbying Govt for Stryker just for but it's fucking true

It's a laughter of irony (and insanity), brozzer.

 

[jaijaganath]

Stryker infantry vehicle deal with U.S. progresses; Javelin missile to be demonstrated again

India considers procurement of Stryker infantry combat vehicles from the U.S. amid ongoing negotiations and defence deals.

www.thehindu.com

Stryker infantry vehicle deal with U.S. progresses; Javelin missile to be demonstrated again​

View attachment 24170

View attachment 24172

It's deliberately being pushed despite being pathetic and performing poor in trails

This is how strong lobbying looks like

 

[shade2]

It's deliberately being pushed despite being pathetic and performing poor in trails

This is how strong lobbying looks like

By now i'm convinced the Nijjer-Pannu drama was for this purpose only.
Kill whAp, and bulk buy 2000 of obsolete shit that even America itself is replacing.

Pic related, the poor Mahindra WhAp wasn't even given a chance

 

[fire starter]

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1887466997463851211?t=11gp7eykHb3O3QgfMx2V3Q&s=19

 

[randombully]

View: https://x.com/Flankerchan/status/1670996184230690822

A reality of rafale vs j20.

 

[AGNI 6 ICBM]

Big conflict happens between bharat & chyna in Ladakh.....

Scenario 1 :

We and chinks get Involved in light tank VS light tank rift
We loose all zooravar and chinks to loose loose their light tank.....
We try to produce zooravar LT in emergency way but it will depend on white bitch Cummins production rate...
Chinks deploy their wheeled 105 mm tank killers...
Generolls with their pea sized brains forget about Power to weight ratio and will try to integrate 105 mm turret for Stryker....it fails in mobility trails....

Outcome :

saaaaar "we were poorly armed & it was surprise from enemies" will be said by Generolls

Bhaiyo aur behno "Ye yudh ke nahi budh ki samay hai" will be said by leader ji for receiving NO-Bell prize

MOD & EAM with their sons & daughters in USA "

"

While nation looses its brave sons



Scenario 2 : well equipped WHAP's with 105 MM turret & APS with very good power to weight ratio , 105 MM shoot - scout garuda artillery & Desi ATAGS acting as deterrence





Outcome : 🕉


BSDK genrolls , Madarch0d import lobby & Ghandoo CIA doesn't want scenario 2

IMO this is why private sector never touches R & D .....

 

[jaijaganath]

Big conflict happens between bharat & chyna in Ladakh.....

Scenario 1 :

We and chinks get Involved in light tank VS light tank rift
We loose all zooravar and chinks to loose loose their light tank.....
We try to produce zooravar LT in emergency way but it will depend on white bitch Cummins production rate...
Chinks deploy their wheeled 105 mm tank killers...
Generolls with their pea sized brains forget about Power to weight ratio and will try to integrate 105 mm turret for Stryker....it fails in mobility trails....

Outcome :

saaaaar "we were poorly armed & it was surprise from enemies" will be said by Generolls

Bhaiyo aur behno "Ye yudh ke nahi budh ki samay hai" will be said by leader ji for receiving NO-Bell prize

MOD & EAM with their sons & daughters in USA "

"

While nation looses its brave sons



Scenario 2 : well equipped WHAP's with 105 MM turret & APS with very good power to weight ratio , 105 MM shoot - scout garuda artillery & Desi ATAGS acting as deterrence

View attachment 24189
View attachment 24190
View attachment 24191
View attachment 24192
Outcome : 🕉


BSDK genrolls , Madarch0d import lobby & Ghandoo CIA doesn't want scenario 2

IMO this is why private sector never touches R & D .....

My hate for gernails and Jai ho gang is well known
But in this case u feel it's being pushed by pmo itself and rather army being not interested coz if u see reports consistently stating army flagging concerns and poor performance of the platform
But the push is coming from MoD or PMO

I feel case here is different USA wants to destroy our ifv industry and making us completely dependent over their supply through which they can army twist us and we are bound to allow them as they have kept supply of ge-404 and 414 on table

It's a situation we can't avoid rather have to accept their conditions

 

[AGNI 6 ICBM]

1:1 scale model of AMCA in Aeroindia
1:10 scale model of Tejas Mk 2 🕉️
1:4 scale model of TEDBF

Tejas mk 2 cockpit






View: https://x.com/writetake/status/1887500661006475344


Anyone from DFB visiting Aeroindia on 14 th ?

 

[AGNI 6 ICBM]

Agni 3 RAIL TEL 🕉





Cropped Nose cone ?......MIRV ?.....DRDO is hiding something

@dfi_pk



Something similar to this ?

View: https://youtu.be/_1E39hy4q2w?si=QruPkzq9ZDoPeacf

 

[Anants]

Man Be it testing Brayton Cycle based Engines or Otto Cycle based Engines or Diesel cycle based engines - why do we need to run to our future competitors

View: https://x.com/shiv_cybersurg/status/1887166322481443144

View: https://x.com/shiv_cybersurg/status/1887363013348385106

View: https://x.com/1_alohaHindu/status/1887166783024455779

 

[Operatorr]

VSHORAD is likely the only missile in its class with a reaction control system instead of the more common thrust vectoring, providing it with extreme maneuverability

 

[BHARAT KA BETA]

Big conflict happens between bharat & chyna in Ladakh.....

Scenario 1 :

We and chinks get Involved in light tank VS light tank rift
We loose all zooravar and chinks to loose loose their light tank.....
We try to produce zooravar LT in emergency way but it will depend on white bitch Cummins production rate...
Chinks deploy their wheeled 105 mm tank killers...
Generolls with their pea sized brains forget about Power to weight ratio and will try to integrate 105 mm turret for Stryker....it fails in mobility trails....

Outcome :

saaaaar "we were poorly armed & it was surprise from enemies" will be said by Generolls

Bhaiyo aur behno "Ye yudh ke nahi budh ki samay hai" will be said by leader ji for receiving NO-Bell prize

MOD & EAM with their sons & daughters in USA "

"

While nation looses its brave sons



Scenario 2 : well equipped WHAP's with 105 MM turret & APS with very good power to weight ratio , 105 MM shoot - scout garuda artillery & Desi ATAGS acting as deterrence

View attachment 24189
View attachment 24190
View attachment 24191
View attachment 24192
Outcome : 🕉


BSDK genrolls , Madarch0d import lobby & Ghandoo CIA doesn't want scenario 2

IMO this is why private sector never touches R & D .....

A nationwide protest by the aware youth is needed to stop this hegemony by the import lobbies...they are destroying the taxpayers money for appeasement, rather than making domestic industries capacities stronger

 

[AbRaj]

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1887466997463851211?t=11gp7eykHb3O3QgfMx2V3Q&s=19

Anyone watched this movie ?

View: https://youtu.be/rmC3ZhIHHi4?si=gvdslR549T4M9cQm

 

[Ayan Barat]

View attachment 24225View attachment 24226
VSHORAD is likely the only missile in its class with a reaction control system instead of the more common thrust vectoring, providing it with extreme maneuverability

> What use is extreme maneuverability in a missile designed to engage helicopters?
> Even if you achieve extreme maneuverability, you're speed is still just Mach 1.5?
> Reaction control is generally used where there's no atmosphere to use traditional Control Surfaces like higher altitude or even space
> In endo-atmospheric role it's used when the speed is so high that the response from regular Control Surfaces would "lag" significantly like in case of PAC3-CRI with Mach 5 or Aster-30 with Mach 4.5
> After just a few meters from the launcher all the four divergent thrusters are fired (notice four separate plumes), so how can they be used later? And if there are multiple tandem motors inside then how much fuel are you actually going to pack inside a small missile?

> RCS thrusters are almost always placed perpendicular to the fuselage as that's the only way to use the total force to change the yaw or pitch. Also the thrusters are placed as further front as possible the lever arm is longest, generating maximum turning moment. If placed too close to the actual rear thrusters then it may cause the missile to "skid" instead of turning

>If placed tangentially then instead of the whole force, you'll get just the vertical component of it. In this case Fy which would always be smaller than force F as it'd be sin θ times of it


Someone should dig deeper into this and probably ask someone from DRDO (not from Adani, who's poster were first to claim this RCS thing)