- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 493
- Likes
- 1,898
FUEL LEAKSgt. Stout, a possible candidate for Indian Army's 103 Air Defence Gun Missile System (SP) in action.
View attachment 27034
FUEL LEAKSgt. Stout, a possible candidate for Indian Army's 103 Air Defence Gun Missile System (SP) in action.
View attachment 27034
So all the past news about 100% Indigenization & TOT was false.
This is how we are being made chutiya regarding license production & TOT .
View: https://x.com/AdithyaKM_/status/1897999349357199781?t=A40dtb6M9Z9PDHjeI74xPg&s=19
In reality no meaningful TOT is given & no tech absorption is done .we remain dependent on foreign OEM forever.
needs to be live tested on kangalusDrdo 300kw DEW surya View attachment 27084![]()
It's universally hated.Alright guys, has anyone actually know what the US mech force grunts feel about the Stryker as a war machine?
what is the differentiators between choosing the ULPGM or SANT type of launch mechanisms?
View: https://x.com/livefist/status/1469652184790831106
ULPGM is drop launched whereas as the SANT flies off the hard point of the helicopter.
ULPGM is also a micro munition and SANT is more analogous to the AGM 114 Hellfire or Spike NLOS missile.
IMO, only issue will be quad stacks (2x2) common on helisyes, why?
what will SANT loose in functionality if it is drop launched?
Traditionally Tube launch provided immediate thrust for stability and accuracy, or else missiles had the tendency to start tilting their nose downwards if they are drop launched unless missile had good centre of balance to maintain mostly horizontal position till the rocket motor ignites and pushes it forward which can take a few seconds.yes, why?
what will SANT loose in functionality if it is drop launched?
We should not cope with WHAP will be selected. Instead it is better to scream Muh corruption with Stryker and policy failure.Alright guys, has anyone actually know what the US mech force grunts feel about the Stryker as a war machine?
For high altitude I think we are getting a more powerful engine, the above variant in the pic would be actually good, replace the stingers(?) with new gen javelins and a 30mm. Would be mobile and sufficient firepower with defensive soft kill capabilities. Later on we can add LM/drone capability. Basically modify it with indigenous tech create new variants.
Would still prefer the Mahindra whap though however, if its happening, there is nothing we can say/do. Just cope. lol
Bro, they take 60,000 per month just for SCREWDRIVERGIRI.
Where you can get job like that?
Even today when I got this news, I said all those SELF home made Russian engines news were actually crap.
These people have mastered the art of making fool of indigenous weapons community by showing the same dream that Paki generals do every month with Gold found, Copper found, etc.
Tube launcher adds complexities as missile will then have foldable wing and control surfaces while a much better solution is like hellfire quad launcher ones. Much better than air dropped mechanism too. Bonus in case missile motor fails to ignite you lost the missile entirelyTraditionally Tube launch provided immediate thrust for stability and accuracy, or else missiles had the tendency to start tilting their nose downwards if they are drop launched unless missile had good centre of balance to maintain mostly horizontal position till the rocket motor ignites and pushes it forward which can take a few seconds.
Another way was if aircraft drop launched it when moving fast like winged drones, fighters jets.
But helicopters can hover.
So tube launched provided more flexibility in how to launch the missile whether moving or hovering.
Now modern day missiles can be designed to be drop launched even from hovering platform quite easily, like ulpgm.
But tube launch has become "standard", all attack helis and their weapons racks are designed for tube launch as default, because even in modern times tube launch also provides ability to stack missiles over another.
So unlike drop launching from drones, there's not much benefit to switching over to drop launch missile from helicopters.
basically better version of tube launch missile.Tube launcher adds complexities as missile will then have foldable wing and control surfaces while a much better solution is like hellfire quad launcher ones. Much better than air dropped mechanism too. Bonus in case missile motor fails to ignite you lost the missile entirely View attachment 27151View attachment 27152