Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

Do you even realise the tragedy in case of major war for smallest states of India like Himachal and UK with TFR in both states already below replacement is used to fill almost 6 Lakh army, are you serious buddy?

As per last official figures from Govt one can assume currently Himachal might be having around 70000 active soldiers and UK 65000 that is if we consider per capita recruitment based on 1 lakh population and accumulate for past 15 years.

That means as of now also in case a major war is started these two states will pay very heavy specially HP.

Filling 6 lakh soldiers from these states basically puts entire fertile male population in jeopardy and seals the fate of whole demographics of these two states.

Himachal ideally should not contribute more than 25000 and UK 35000 as TFR of these states are already reaching closer to East Asian nations in few years may be increase TFR to over 3 then there is a case of current strength provided to military by these states
ohhh...but i m saying in hypothetical term. that if any case scenario we face war. if indian army want to take half of force from himanchal nd uttarakhand. they can get it. ur point about TFR true. but first thing army never gonna take new recruits only from himanchal nd uttarakhand. second thing if current generation facing extinction threat, then they dont care about upcoming genration.
my motive is tell u, that in himalayan state army service is very attractive jobs for people. nd huge number of people ready to join army. nd this is ground reality. war always brings tragedy nd sacrifices with it.
 
Last edited:
Himachal and Uttarakhand needs industries, better tourist develop along with supporting environment compliant civic infra. About TFr it's right, currently both himachal and Uttarakhand are getting filled by peaceful quietly and steadily. I don't think situation would remain same in future as it has for so many years.

Right now Army is having hard time combing tangos in jammu region. If demographics is allowed to change in neighboring himachal in future and we will have much much hard time than kashmir as there are hardly any vast valleys like kashmir.
 
Last edited:
Himachal and Uttarakhand needs I industries, better tourist develop al9ng with supporting environment compliant civic infra. About TFr it's right, vurrentky both himachal and Uttarakhand are getting filled by peaceful quietly and steadily. I don't think situati9n would remain as it has for so many years.

yaa rather than worrying about filling army in largest population nation they should increase thr TFR, stop muslim migration and try to develop local jobs.
 
yaa rather than worrying about filling army in largest population nation they should increase thr TFR, stop muslim migration and try to develop local jobs.
yeah...work in progress. already land acquisition law build recently. In 10 years due to UP border from sharanpur, mujjafarbaad etc...many muslims came to uttarakhand. that time land laws not strong as himanchal. himanchal didnt face this muslim migration problem.
about TFR, naah. its not going to solve. first reason is people know more children means more burden economically. second reason people r marrying in their late 30s. so they r satisfied with one children. most new married couple i watch in uttarakhand, they r preferring one child, only some r having two children. i dont see any new couple who hv 3 children.
 
yeah...work in progress. already land acquisition law build recently. In 10 years due to UP border from sharanpur, mujjafarbaad etc...many muslims came to uttarakhand. that time land laws not strong as himanchal. himanchal didnt face this muslim migration problem.
about TFR, naah. its not going to solve. first reason is people know more children means more burden economically. second reason people r marrying in their late 30s. so they r satisfied with one children. most new married couple i watch in uttarakhand, they r preferring one child, only some r having two children. i dont see any new couple who hv 3 children.
Himachal laws are not able to stop the migration. When has law of land deterred them?
 
yeah...work in progress. already land acquisition law build recently. In 10 years due to UP border from sharanpur, mujjafarbaad etc...many muslims came to uttarakhand. that time land laws not strong as himanchal. himanchal didnt face this muslim migration problem.
about TFR, naah. its not going to solve. first reason is people know more children means more burden economically. second reason people r marrying in their late 30s. so they r satisfied with one children. most new married couple i watch in uttarakhand, they r preferring one child, only some r having two children. i dont see any new couple who hv 3 children.

2 children are least necessary to barely replace the local population, 3 are ideal to grow otherwise migration will bound to happen and locals cant stop.

Every Hindu couple needs to have at least 3 otherwise with in few generations we are handing out biggest GDP country on planet to muslims
 
Himachal laws are not able to stop the migration. When has law of land deterred them?
outsiders cant buy lands in himanchal. i never heard himanchal is complaining about muslim migration in news etc. even in uttarakhand, gadhwal side like haridwar, dehradun, rudkee is facing muslim migration. yet their number isnt like other states. thats why we not heard any big conflict news from uttarakhand nd himanchal. neither we see any blockade or attack in hindus festivals etc. problem is their TFR is higher than hindus. which will be problematic in future, right now its not that problematic. except some areas situated with UP borders.
 
outsiders cant buy lands in himanchal. i never heard himanchal is complaining about muslim migration in news etc. even in uttarakhand, gadhwal side like haridwar, dehradun, rudkee is facing muslim migration. yet their number isnt like other states. thats why we not heard any big conflict news from uttarakhand nd himanchal. neither we see any blockade or attack in hindus festivals etc. problem is their TFR is higher than hindus. which will be problematic in future, right now its not that problematic. except some areas situated with UP borders.
It was the case. But they have been steadily encroaching forest Lands, ravine lands . I never saw Burkhas in ahimachal all these years but saw for first time that too in area which had zilch deobandi or jamaiti type population.

I was surprised when one person told me about huge jamaiti congregation happened before or during early corona times in himachal where zilch peaceful population existed before.

By law of land they(outsiders) can't buy land especially in rural himachal. But that does not stop migration and majeed buildings springing up. Recent videos cropped up of rohingyas and others I interior upper himachal settling down. Its increasing that's why you hear about tensions in Shimla or Chamba or in Una district over past few years.

Land Laws shall fail if Govt is not sincere in implementing them.
 
Last edited:
I am yet to see an honest self aware porki in my life. These inbreds claim Kashmir and Junagarh at the same time not realising putting a claim on one negates the claim on the other. You can't be like "Kashmir belongs to pakistan because majority is muslim but Hindu ruler acceded to India", and at the same time be like "Junagarh belongs to pakistan because the muslim ruler acceded to pakistan but majority Hindu population made it a part of India".

Other than that Radcliffe line did give away Hindu majority region to these inbreds, last I checked Karachi had around only ~40% muslim population during partition iinw. Majority was of Hindus and rest were Christians, Zoroastrians and Sikhs. As recently as 1998, Tharparkar (and Nagarparkar?) district had Hindu majority, that district is sandwiched between Rajasthan and Gujarat, ideally should've been given to India for all practical reasons, yet wasn't.
1743586350962.webp
1743586318088.webp



Happens when your entire synthetic identity is built upon on a line built by a clueless Anglo.
 
2 children are least necessary to barely replace the local population, 3 are ideal to grow otherwise migration will bound to happen and locals cant stop.

Every Hindu couple needs to have at least 3 otherwise with in few generations we are handing out biggest GDP country on planet to muslims
In Haryana even today I see a lot of young couple with three kids. Male child is desired by everyone, so usually we see 2 girls and 1 boy child.
 
yeah...work in progress. already land acquisition law build recently. In 10 years due to UP border from sharanpur, mujjafarbaad etc...many muslims came to uttarakhand. that time land laws not strong as himanchal. himanchal didnt face this muslim migration problem.
about TFR, naah. its not going to solve. first reason is people know more children means more burden economically. second reason people r marrying in their late 30s. so they r satisfied with one children. most new married couple i watch in uttarakhand, they r preferring one child, only some r having two children. i dont see any new couple who hv 3 children.
In Haryanavi villages still girls marry before 20 and boys marry as young as 21 fortunately.
 
outsiders cant buy lands in himanchal. i never heard himanchal is complaining about muslim migration in news etc. even in uttarakhand, gadhwal side like haridwar, dehradun, rudkee is facing muslim migration. yet their number isnt like other states. thats why we not heard any big conflict news from uttarakhand nd himanchal. neither we see any blockade or attack in hindus festivals etc. problem is their TFR is higher than hindus. which will be problematic in future, right now its not that problematic. except some areas situated with UP borders.
TFR of muslims is higher due to their strong traditional values, while in Hindus family values and social bondings are being diluted by the system itself through continuous media propaganda, fake gurus brainwashing children's against their own parents etc. Govt is promoting extreme liberal values along with unnecessary interference of Police and Judiciary in personal and family matters. State institutions failing to provide justice in marriage disputes. Inheritance laws, pro women laws , are playing a very negative role. Lastly uncontrolled social media and movies are promoting degeneracy.
 
TFR of muslims is higher due to their strong traditional values, while in Hindus family values and social bondings are being diluted by the system itself through continuous media propaganda, fake gurus brainwashing children's against their own parents etc. Govt is promoting extreme liberal values along with unnecessary interference of Police and Judiciary in personal and family matters. State institutions failing to provide justice in marriage disputes. Inheritance laws, pro women laws , are playing a very negative role. Lastly uncontrolled social media and movies are promoting degeneracy.
which gurus brainwashing children against their own parents😳? i dont follow babas etc, this baba culture i dont like. yeah learning nd respecting them is another matter. but people in india make them like avatars etc, like as sai baba, satpal maharaj etc.
naah....muslim higher TFR is due to their low understanding of real world. otherwise u didnt see low TFR (1.6) in jammu kashmir. they believe their kids care nd sustainence done by bullah. if we create a environment, where they cant afford more kids. their TFR also go down. look at prosperous arab countries like saudi, UAE, iran, turkey etc...their TFR is also going down. even if u hv very strong traditional values, with increasing wealth. ur country TFR most times go down. other factors r secondary.
images (7).webp
 
which gurus brainwashing children against their own parents😳? i dont follow babas etc, this baba culture i dont like. yeah learning nd respecting them is another matter. but people in india make them like avatars etc, like as sai baba, satpal maharaj etc.
naah....muslim higher TFR is due to their low understanding of real world. otherwise u didnt see low TFR (1.6) in jammu kashmir. they believe their kids care nd sustainence done by bullah. if we create a environment, where they cant afford more kids. their TFR also go down. look at prosperous arab countries like saudi, UAE, iran, turkey etc...their TFR is also going down. even if u hv very strong traditional values, with increasing wealth. ur country TFR most times go down. other factors r secondary.
View attachment 29312
So called Acharya Prashant.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top