Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Canada’s security agencies suspect Modi knew of plot to kill Sikh activist
Intelligence has also tied India’s External Affairs Minister to interference operations, source sayswww.theglobeandmail.com
Kanadians are not interested in de-escalation.
"CDPQ says employees charged in US indictment were terminated in 2023, cooperating with authorities"
"said Sanjay Wadhwa, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement."
"It is being supervised by Tejal D. Shah."
Corruption and cartelisation should be dealt with strongly, however raul baba is using toolkit and activists, in this interview he confesses that his visits to usa is for this purpose and he is using activist network to further his agenda, raul baba it seems is cooperating with radical elements in Trudeau and Biden administration for teaching ebil moodyji a lesson.
While corruption and caretelisation should be stopped , but raul babas cooperation with radical elements is bad for India in the long run, irrespective of the govt in power.
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/YGz5Im7WXXU
From 13:04
No, you cannot revoke passports of anybody. The GoI can, however, press formal charges against him, issue an arrest warrant and/or slap UAPA.That Indian passport needs to be revoked ASAP!! No passports allowed for Khalistani supporters.
Yes, you can revoke passport of anyone at anytime you wish. Passport is not a right, its a privilege and its not YOUR ID document primarily, its your govt's identity document for you, to other govts, indicating that you are not a convicted criminal or a major big time criminal.No, you cannot revoke passports of anybody. The GoI can, however, press formal charges against him, issue an arrest warrant and/or slap UAPA.
No, you cannot revoke
Yes, you can revoke passport of anyone at anytime you wish.
I am.Which one is true?
Clearly there must be laws that cover this query?
Again news article ? Reports?I am.
Literally gotten at least 4 khalistani passports revoked since khalifarmer protest, 2 had to leave Canada and go back to India.
Any govt. can cancel a passport by picking 1 of 32020383424 reasons it can anytime to pull your passport. Sure, they cant say 'u dont have passport coz of your religion/i dont like your face' coz then courts will call discrimination, but they have like a billion valid reasons to do so.
Heck, sometimes even a simple FIR against you is sufficient for govt. to block your passport from cleared status.
Remember, passport is not like other ID document that you have a right to get provided you qualify ( drivers licence, be of age for ID cards, etc.).
It is a govt. clearance document provided to you, subject to police clearance, that is not your ID for you, but your ID given to you by your govt. as a privilege, with the intent being to show other countries that you are prima facie, not an axe murderer.
You have a right to AADHAR card, you have a right to PAN card, you have a right to voter Card, you have a right to drivers license(provided you passed the test) but you DO NOT have right to a passport.
I wouldnt call taking a bunch of screenshots from social media, recording the name of the person concerned by asking a friend (or themselves in parties by pretending to be a commie bongobondhu of khalis) and popping into the consulate on my way to work as being a warrior.
In any case, that is my past, not the present. I do not dwell in Vancouver anymore and the city i live in has no Indian consulate.
<edit>: deleted rest due to TMI
In the case of Jaswinder Singh vs Union Of India And Another (2019), the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that the registration of an FIR against the person is not enough for the Passport Authorities to cancel the Passport. The restriction only comes into play when proceedings in respect of an offence are pending before a Criminal Court. Unless cognizance is taken by the Criminal Court, the provision of the Passport Act barring the grant of passport does not apply.Heck, sometimes even a simple FIR against you is sufficient for govt. to block your passport from cleared status.
Remembe
strange. coz my cousin's p-port got flagged when he was going through divorce coz his ex-wife filed a DV case against him.he did DV her, so i am not gonna pretend its eebil woke feminazi crap just coz my family is involved - but he did get his p-port flagged and refused exit to go back to dubai for his work.In the case of Jaswinder Singh vs Union Of India And Another (2019), the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that the registration of an FIR against the person is not enough for the Passport Authorities to cancel the Passport. The restriction only comes into play when proceedings in respect of an offence are pending before a Criminal Court. Unless cognizance is taken by the Criminal Court, the provision of the Passport Act barring the grant of passport does not apply.
Unless court summon is done FIR is never enough
Was he summoned by Court?strange. coz my cousin's p-port got flagged when he was going through divorce coz his ex-wife filed a DV case against him.he did DV her, so i am not gonna pretend its eebil woke feminazi crap just coz my family is involved - but he did get his p-port flagged and refused exit to go back to dubai for his work.
Maybe its because of difference in application of the law by various agencies/people not going to court over it.
Edit : oh this is from 2019. well, my cuz went through this in 2014 so maybe this was valid back then.
he was, but not sure if his summon came before/after he tried to go back to dubai from vacay. he nearly killed her by throwing a nora at her and broke her left orbital bone before he got his pport flagged but i didnt really delve into the exact sordid details coz i avoid gossip and family khusurphusur like the bubonic plague.Was he summoned by Court?
Strictly speaking, passports can be revoked in case the bearer violates the passport act but what do you do if the person is an NRI with permanent residency in a foreign nation and in posession of a duly cleared perfectly valid passport?Which one is true?
Clearly there must be laws that cover this query?