Indian Air Force: News & Discussions (21 Viewers)

indeed it is good, but for our diverse terrain, randombully saab said that a turboprop would be the best, a400m is in between c17 and mta category, it can lift light tanks and artillery guns which ig c390 cannot


C17 is turbofan. We are using from leh to A&N. We can use C390 also. Point is Embraer showing interest to invest in India. If we are getting assembly and MSME providing sub components. We should go for it.

A400M is EU soup kitche project. Alao US jacking up prices for every second order.
 
Astra has a range "exceeding 100 kms" - New RF Seeker tested successfully, 2 targets destroyed with Su-30MKI.


View attachment 43025
Wow. Great news. So this is true- Navy is pushing very strongly for ASTRA series as its backbone.
March 2025 Test was first of its tests of Indigenous seeker done by Navy for VL-SAM in S2A mode. Now this another test for seeker in A2A mode. .
Love it - Now ASTRA-1 in large numbers for VL-SAM of NAVY. And ASTRA-2 for Mig29K. Great going for Navy.
Air Force would also be interested in ASTRA based Quick Reaction VL-SAM to protect its vital installations. I hope they consider this ASTRA based VL-SAM in decent numbers over much costlier QRSAM. Air Force would not have a requirement of Mobile Tracked requirement to fire on move. Manufacture in large numbers - Augment and compliment SPYDER .
Now eagerly waiting for ELTA20252 and UTTAM firing ASTRA with new seeker and demonstrating cooperative mode later this year.
Great day time to party.
 
C-390 is a good platform for Transport planes. We are in dire need and a Local Assembly will be a good thing. Infact we should ask Embraer to introduce manufacturing plants in India. Good chances for them to sell E2 series planes.
If they do not buy anything in return then it is a bad deal.
 
It's a operational validation test.
Indegenious seeker is used in production missiles delivered.
Only earlier limited series production missiles had russian seeker.
we heard we are going to make aesa based RF seeker for astra 1....when will it come. do we hv aesa seekers in our astra mark 2 bvr??
 
That what happens dude when u dont have merit based hires … that shud be obvious to everyone 🤣🤣🤣
okkk...first thing i dont know DRDO etc r getting their employees from reservation. let assume they r doing it. if u think merit based hiring solve engine etc issue. 37% seats fill by merit (unreserved seats), why cant they make engine etc?? DRDO hv 30000 employees, from that near 11100 are merit walas. isnt that many people good enough for any project. u hv hope that later 67% merit walas make u engine etc😂. what about 100% hiring on base of merit in private companies. why cant they develop engine etc??
second thing, if we really want talented people in DRDO etc. why cant we open hiring from other countries?? why DRDO only providing job to indians, isnt it also a indian reservation. coz reservation means reservering seats for a person, group or community. will u allowed DRDO to hire from other countries? we can get even better scientist than indians😛.
real problem is about providing sufficient funding for a project nd mismanagement. u r just diverting to another issue.
 
Last edited:
I always wonder why IAF mig 29 sqd always maintain low profile. Any leads . they are like non existent
 

The Jews are facing supply chain issues with the X-guard towed decoy.

Whether this is because they are at war and occasionally missiled by Iran or because their US pals have requested them to idk
 

The Jews are facing supply chain issues with the X-guard towed decoy.

Whether this is because they are at war and occasionally missiled by Iran or because their US pals have requested them to idk
BDL or BEL should partner up with Rafael to start manufacturing this locally. Apart from Rafale, SU-30 MKI MLU & Super Sukhoi and LCAs should be getting this. Integration should be manageable as these fighters have local RWR.


View: https://vimeo.com/924413882
 
As bad as IAF crash rate is today, it ws truly hopeless in the 80s and 90s. IAF crashed 190 jets in a 9 year period between 1990 and 1999, and took the lives of 60+ pilots.

>In a statement made in March this year, Defence Minister George Fernandes said of the 37 IAF plane crashes since January 1997, 15 were due to technical defects while 12 were caused by human error. In three cases both of them were responsible. In two of these accidents, it was during training that the accident took place involving the training aircraft Kiran Mk 1A. But in nine cases it was pure human error on the part of the trained pilot that caused the accident.



As usual IAF, HAL and babus blaming one another.
 
As bad as IAF crash rate is today, it ws truly hopeless in the 80s and 90s. IAF crashed 190 jets in a 9 year period between 1990 and 1999, and took the lives of 60+ pilots.

>In a statement made in March this year, Defence Minister George Fernandes said of the 37 IAF plane crashes since January 1997, 15 were due to technical defects while 12 were caused by human error. In three cases both of them were responsible. In two of these accidents, it was during training that the accident took place involving the training aircraft Kiran Mk 1A. But in nine cases it was pure human error on the part of the trained pilot that caused the accident.



As usual IAF, HAL and babus blaming one another.

The problem is today the Ching has over 3000 jets in service and more being built.
We don't have anything on order which will be delivered.

The GE shitshow will continue and supply chain issues will strike again anytime America is upset with us.

IAF crashes today are worse because they have a bigger impact on our overall capability with fighter jet numbers declining viz adversaries.
 
As bad as IAF crash rate is today, it ws truly hopeless in the 80s and 90s. IAF crashed 190 jets in a 9 year period between 1990 and 1999, and took the lives of 60+ pilots.

>In a statement made in March this year, Defence Minister George Fernandes said of the 37 IAF plane crashes since January 1997, 15 were due to technical defects while 12 were caused by human error. In three cases both of them were responsible. In two of these accidents, it was during training that the accident took place involving the training aircraft Kiran Mk 1A. But in nine cases it was pure human error on the part of the trained pilot that caused the accident.



As usual IAF, HAL and babus blaming one another.
It happens when they were basically training pilots on Mig 21's as they didn't have a trainer because it took 20 years to get the BAE Hawk . That's the Indian style .

And when you buy a Thali of jets from all over the place, you don't get the logistics done properly for good maintainence of the jets..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top