Indian Army: News and Updates


View: https://x.com/ANI/status/1883161531380342988

GiJVSJvbQAAsBP4
 
Is that a Mudhol Hound? Also that seems like an early retirement
1738860591981.webp
1738860601271.webp
1738860614475.webp
1738860623614.webp
 
Last edited:

View: https://twitter.com/KesariDhwaj/status/1890644064649064825?s=19

Stryker and the Indian Army


- First things first, it is clear that the deal for Stryker is a top-down decision and did not come from the army.
- And the deal is going to happen.
- Be that as it may, the army seems to have made peace and given its recommendations.
- Given the fact that Stryker is not amphibious, which is a must have feature to fight along our western borders, the army seems to have limited its role to Eastern Ladakh.
- Which might be a silver lining as it still keeps window opens for large induction of WhAP/Kestrel.
- So, fingers crossed!


(1) M1304 ICVVA1 Stryker


- As per my freind @Hukum, the army has sought the M1304 ICVVA1 version - this one has an unmanned turret with 30mm Bushmaster cannon and is based on double hull version which gives higher protection against IEDs.
- This is M1304 ICVVA1 -




---
(2) Javelin and Stryker
- This brings me to the second question - Where does Javelin fit into this Stryker procurement?
- Well, the US Army has a dedicated Stryker version with Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station- Javeline (CROWS-J) instead of a turret.
- This allows the Javelin to be fired from within the vehicle. But reload obviously exposes the troops.
- This is CROW-J which also has a Browing machine gun:



And as seen here, troops are exposed during reloading.

--
- In the American scheme of things (remember the Table of Organization and Equipment that I shout about?), the Stryker Brigades are being equipped 50:50 with 30mm version and Javelin version
.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top