Indian Navy Developments & Discussions

1736937847051.webp
D67 with FS Chevallier
 
View attachment 21903
D67 with FS Chevallier
A nice serene sunset, the faint rays of sun touch your face one last time before they vanish behind that endless horizon, the vast ocean making you realise what more is your existing than a mere spec of dust, your whole life flashes by your eyes, that breathtakingly pretty girl you once saw in your college, this job, the family back at home...you contemplate everything while standing on top of 300kg of pure high explosive, 2t worth of kerosene and few hundred kilos of solid rocket fuel.

You ask one last time; what was your existence?
IMG_20250115_162443.webp
 
Y'all nibbiars, What was the "original" armament config of P-15A/Kolkata class does anyone know?

I guess originally it was meant to be a iterative improvement design on arm-launcher toting Delhi class but IN made changes to get it to the current state, where the design/armament gulf between P-15 Delhi and P-15A Kolkata is much wider as compared to the minor changes between P-15A and P-15B


Per this ancient article IN demanded changes to integrate the Barak-8 VLS SAM( was MF-STAR also added or was it originally planned ? ) in place of "Kashtan SAM" ( The ciws or is this something else? )

According to the CAG's audit report, the Kashtan surface-to-air missile was replaced with the Long Range Surface to Air Missile (LR-SAM), which the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) is still co-developing with Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI).

IN also demanded changes to "gun mount" but i can't make out if this is the 76mm front cannon replacing the Roosi 100mm cannon or some other gun.

Similarly, the navy decided to change the gun mount in March 2008, after the first ship was launched. This "necessitated redesign of the entire structure around the gun mount" says the CAG.
 
yes with extra stealthy vertical pillars, and special bionic arm which looks like crane makes its super stealthy
View attachment 21905
Han, abhi baal ke khaal nikalte raho aap. And it's not as if our stealth destroyer is lacking when it comes to vertical surfaces and clothe hangers sticking out of every bit of available real estate.
 
Last edited:
Mein Gott!! Even their tanker looks more stealthy than our 'stealth' destroyer.
That's the point of it... It isn't. It's just the fore-section shaping that's giving that effectI. It's just looks, we shouldn't care much for looks.
 
Han, abhi baal ke khaal nikalte raho aap. And it's not as if our destroyer is lacking when it comes to vertical surfaces and clothe hangers sticking out of every bit of real estate.
Sorry you dry fish over them and not clothes. Our ships shall have plasma stealth so shape does not matter </sarc
 
That's the point of it... It isn't. It's just the fore-section shaping that's giving that effectI. It's just looks, we shouldn't care much for looks.
I know, but can't we just make our designs a little more... you know?? Streamlined and clean??
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top