Indian Navy Developments & Discussions

So max diameter is ~0.65 meters
If you can pack all the fins, hinges, conduits, restraints...in just 25mm (radial height above fuselage of 300mm) then you've achieved a feat that's extremely rare in the whole world regarding packing efficiency of missiles and canister.
Sub launched brahmos ER will use this canister insted of above mentioned universal canister.....
No matter what canister it uses, it would be of similar dimensions.
• you need a safety gap between canister body and missile
• you need space to accommodate all the things that are going to prevent the missile from moving in all six DoFs. When ships move in Sea State 5 the resulting acceleration becomes 2.5g.
• you need space to accommodate a mechanic that allows the missile to move in one DoF when it's fired
• the canister can't be paper thin, there's some thickness of it too
• it's not land or ship, you now need to account for the water pressure too.
Drdo uses similar canisters & TEL's to keep development cost less

That universal canister you posted is used to launch k15 , shaurya , pralay ,
I would be glad to know how DRDO uses the canister developed for cold launch of BrahMos to hot launch K-15, Shaurya and Pralay.
Especially given the fact that this whole canister is just 8.5m whereas Pralay's missile alone is 9m long.
 
If you can pack all the fins, hinges, conduits, restraints...in just 25mm (radial height above fuselage of 300mm) then you've achieved a feat that's extremely rare in the whole world regarding packing efficiency of missiles and canister.

No matter what canister it uses, it would be of similar dimensions.
• you need a safety gap between canister body and missile
• you need space to accommodate all the things that are going to prevent the missile from moving in all six DoFs. When ships move in Sea State 5 the resulting acceleration becomes 2.5g.
• you need space to accommodate a mechanic that allows the missile to move in one DoF when it's fired
• the canister can't be paper thin, there's some thickness of it too
• it's not land or ship, you now need to account for the water pressure too.

I would be glad to know how DRDO uses the canister developed for cold launch of BrahMos to hot launch K-15, Shaurya and Pralay.
Especially given the fact that this whole canister is just 8.5m whereas Pralay's missile alone is 9m long.

I think he's right... If we're gonna make estimates, our baseline should be the universal BrahMos Cannister.
 
Biradars @Bleh @Ayan Barat @AGNI 6 ICBM @vampyrbladez @Indianhawk @Migflug @Blood+ @Azaad
Literally all of you are wrong
Brahmos Dimensions from official Brahmos Aerospace website
What if I say the dimensions in the official site are "wrong" too!?

What exactly is a 200-300kg warhead? You put a 200kg warhead and with time it drinks kerosene and gains 100kg! Or is it a Schrodinger's warhead where it's in a state of 200-300kg untill the detonator goes off. And both air and ground launched versions have the same range of 290km! Where's physics?

The dimensions of the Nibe canister that I quoted is still pretty much the most accurate data you can have if you're dealing with a VLS.
 
What if I say the dimensions in the official site are "wrong" too!?
Sure 😊 whatever you say buddy

What exactly is a 200-300kg warhead? You put a 200kg warhead and with time it drinks kerosene and gains 100kg! Or is it a Schrodinger's warhead where it's in a state of 200-300kg untill the detonator goes off
Who knows maybe it's a Schrodinger's warhead, maybe it's not, Or is it a cannibalistic warhead afterall 🤨🤨
1737919183573.webp
Oh look it ate some of that solid fuel and gained 50 kg in this missile as well, bad bad warhead🤬🤬

Seriously dude, different role, different variant different warhead, what's the big deal.

Maybe the Air launched variant use a smaller warhead, maybe the Navy and Army versions use different types of warhead, no need to make a mountain out of a molehill

And both air and ground launched versions have the same range of 290km! Where's physics?
Where's physics when the range of Ground Launched Brahmos increased from 290 to 800km without any significant structural changes.

Did it ever occur to you that, a brochure meant for foreign dignitaries is bound to have MTCR compliant ranges mentioned in it.
 
Last edited:
How would the TEEVRA 40 (Naval L&T 40mm Bofors) fare in place of the CRN 91 on the ASW-SWC.

Indonesia is using atleast 2 units on it's Teluk Bintuni-class tank landing ship.


View: https://x.com/AdithyaKM_/status/1587832606640713728/photo/1

CRN 91

crngun-spec.jpg

1931798d1573057005-indian-coast-guard-brief-history-its-fleet-19-30mm.jpg


TEEVRA 40

GiNvfVUaAAE6UN4

OZN1cS8vJ0G8kW3j.jpg:large


This Ammunition is used against Aircraft and sea skimmer missile threats. This is fired from 40 mm L70 BOFORS & BREDA 40 mm L70 guns.
https://ddpdoo.gov.in/product/products/product-details/cartridge-40-mm-l-70-pffc1


View: https://x.com/idrwalerts/status/1875186676584309159
 
How would the TEEVRA 40 (Naval L&T 40mm Bofors) fare in place of the CRN 91 on the ASW-SWC.
From a technology perspective it's a perfect replacement (Except less ammo storage and slightly increased weight)
But Paisa Babumoshai Paisa, CRN 91 is dirt cheap compared to literally anything else
 

Bhai, nuke sub program, MPV program, Dhruv and Anvesh, ASWSWC GRSE build, OPVs.
How would the TEEVRA 40 (Naval L&T 40mm Bofors) fare in place of the CRN 91 on the ASW-SWC.

Indonesia is using atleast 2 units on it's Teluk Bintuni-class tank landing ship.


View: https://x.com/AdithyaKM_/status/1587832606640713728/photo/1

CRN 91

crngun-spec.jpg

1931798d1573057005-indian-coast-guard-brief-history-its-fleet-19-30mm.jpg


TEEVRA 40

GiNvfVUaAAE6UN4

OZN1cS8vJ0G8kW3j.jpg:large



https://ddpdoo.gov.in/product/products/product-details/cartridge-40-mm-l-70-pffc1


View: https://x.com/idrwalerts/status/1875186676584309159

The IN has already procured one for user trials. Its on it way to replace every fucking thing that uses the chutya BMP2 at sea.
 
From a technology perspective it's a perfect replacement (Except less ammo storage and slightly increased weight)
But Paisa Babumoshai Paisa, CRN 91 is dirt cheap compared to literally anything else
I am quite damn sure now that this Sudarshan or TEEVRA whatever has its roots in Leonardo Marlin 40 gun.1737920641838.webp
Sudarshan is nothing but ditto design as Leonardo Marlin 40, but with a slightly different outer cover and many components indianised and indigenized.

Well, the gun is fine and all but with an extremely low magzine depth of 72 rounds. They could atleast have made a more dense packing ammo handling system atleast for the ground towed version of the gun where space constraint is not an issue.

This is really a good way to make ch*tiya of IDDM clause. I don't have any problem with private cos 🪛 giri but don't pass your slightly modified foreign maal as some IDDM product when at best it's only an Indian manufactured product only and not designed and developed.

I also hate the fact that even among us people, people tend to simp for more K9 when we should be focusing on developing our own automated ammo/charge handling turreted artillery system and put that thing on whatever the next tank chasis we are planning or even for that sense arjun chasis is superbly fine or make a new chasis with forward engine.

My ideal system for any 40mm based AD gun is something akin to PASARS-16 but with
Indian gun and vshorads. Add EO/IR and a drone detection radar with and you have yourself a reasonably good forward deploy AD unit. We can also add lightweight radar mounted 4*4 as early warning sensor against planes and helis.
 

Attachments

  • images - 2025-01-27T125801.336.webp
    images - 2025-01-27T125801.336.webp
    15.7 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top