Indian Politics and Democracy

You have no idea how retarded you sound, do you? Derivatives, by definition, are unitless. I knew it when I was a high schooler, my goodness!

I'm dealing with utter retards. 🤣

What is the ratio of differentiation of displacement by time?

Does that not have units?

Hint: Velocity is measured in m/s.
 
Another one. Where does differentiation come in?

We are computing delta of one unit divided by delta of another unit.
i dunno where differentiation comes in. I do know WHEN you use d/dx, its unitless. The end.
whether you can apply differentiation to it- is not my field, thats for economists. but when you do apply d/dx, its unitless and that IS my field.
 
I'm dealing with retards. 🤣

What is the ratio of differentiation of displacement by time?

Does that not have units?

Hint: Velocity is measured in m/s.

Look, I am not gonna use Latex to e-lynch some random bhosdapillar so bear with me,

There are two dy/dx in play here,

The first dy/dx indicates rate of change in volume of procurement over the years.

The second dy/dx indicates the rate of change in the nominal GDP over the years.

And I am claiming that the second curve has grown more rapidly.
 
i dunno where differentiation comes in. I do know WHEN you use d/dx, its unitless. The end.
whether you can apply differentiation to it- is not my field, thats for economists. but when you do apply d/dx, its unitless and that IS my field.

So when you differentiate displacement wrt time, velocity is unitless?
 
So when you differentiate displacement wrt time, velocity is unitless?

Derivatives are unitless in purely mathematical context. The definiton of differentiation is done in mathematics. You do not determine differentiability of functions in Physical sciences. No need to engage in wordplay.
 
Look, I am not gonna use Latex to e-lynch some random bhosdapillar so bear with me,

There are two dy/dx in play here,

The first dy/dx indicates rate of change in volume of procurement over the years.

The second dy/dx indicates the rate of change in the nominal GDP over the years.

And I am claiming that the second curve has grown more rapidly.

Rate of change of two independent units is meaningless unless you compare the ratio and different from when you tried to compare the ratio of expenditure to gdp.
 
Derivatives are unitless in purely mathematical context. The definiton of differentiation is done in mathematics. You do not determine differentiability of functions in Physical sciences. No need to engage in wordplay.

Dx/dt is differentiation and has a unit.
 
So when you differentiate displacement wrt time, velocity is unitless?
Oh my god stop posting.. I was hoping to get actual info out of this bitch fight..
I cringed when you said "You are embarrassing yourself" while doing that to your self ... But holy shit did you even pass 12th standard.
In simple language dx/dy is the change of y wrt x... Velocity only exists in an instance not over the entire curve
 
Dx/dt is differentiation and has a unit.

In purely mathematical context, it does not. You can declare any random function x(t) over its domain and differentiate it wrt t. Units come into play only when you are consudering physical significance.

You can perfectly solve a dufferential equation involving x(t) and draw its curve without giving a damn about its units.
 
Oh my god stop posting.. I was hoping to get actual info out of this bitch fight..
I cringed when you said "You are embarrassing yourself" while doing that to your self ... But holy shit did you even pass 12th standard.
In simple language dx/dy is the change of y wrt x...

Yes, in this case displacement wrt time, which is not unitless.

Similarly, if you compute change in tonnes by change in gdp it will not be unitless.
 
In purely mathematical context, it does not. You can declare any random function x(t) over its domain and differentiate it wrt t. Units come into play only when you are consudering physical significance.

You can perfectly solve a dufferential equation involving x(t) and draw its curve without giving a damn about its units.

Sure, but when you want to compare volume as a ratio of GDP, your analogy doesn't apply.

Even rate of change of volume over time would not be unitless. It would be tonnes per year or something similar.
 
Yes, in this case displacement wrt time, which is not unitless.

Similarly, if you compute change in tonnes by change in gdp it will not be unitless.
Velocity as you explained it only exists in an instance not over the entire curve
 
Mine is much more comprehendible than the gibberish you have spouted.

I wasn't looking to mock you, went through your previous responses and noticed your frequent usage of emojis. That alone tells me that you are likely very young so I am not going to mock you anymore.

I genuinely could not comprehend what you wrote.

When making comparisons, we take ratios at the points in time. We don't take ratios of independent units.

Suppose function v(t) is the distribution of volumes (at MSP) over time t (in years). Function g(t) is the distribution of nominal GDP over time t (in years). You plot the data and fit a curve.

You can compare who is growing more rapidly, can you not?
 
I wasn't looking to mock you, went through your previous responses and noticed your frequent usage of emojis. That alone tells me that you are likely very young so I am not going to mock you anymore.

I genuinely could not comprehend what you wrote.



Suppose function v(t) is the distribution of volumes (at MSP) over time t (in years). Function g(t) is the distribution of nominal GDP over time t (in years). You plot the data and fit a curve.

You can compare who is growing more rapidly, can you not?

Dude your use of some bhosda nonsense renders your post barely comprehensible.

Sure, but since the reference of the origin point of both units is not comparable, we don't know what the rate of growth of them means indepently.

We don't know what 400 tons and 1.5 T GDP mena wrt to each other.

Thus, we take the ratio at both points and compute the growth.

As we did with the ratio of spend to GDP and compared the ratio between the two points.
 
derivatives are unitless. When you plug back the derivative into your final solution, you have to keep in mind the units- if applicable. In short, yes dx/dt is unitless.

So an intermediate step is unitless, which is incomplete. It's like saying any calculation is unitless.

The resulting derivate will always have units based on units of what you computing.

That's like saying 5 meters by 1 sec is unitless as it's just 5/1. Which is inaccurate.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top