Indian Politics and Democracy

View attachment 16550

Ex ampaasidor.

"A Bangladesh type boycott threat may force transparency & reform".

These are the two bit d***** who furthered (?) India's interests while being a diplomat & are supposed to do that after retirement.

A "Bangladesh type boycott" is a call for treason against India & its people.

S*bversives who keep taking about non existent manipulation - straight out of western regime change operation.

Indians should do all that is necessary to squat the threat to our democracy if it come to that.
I have seen this clown in TV debates, very low to average IQ individual. I believe he is a soft Khalistani. He accuse non Sikhs of Beadbi in Punjab and downplays Christian conversion and caste discrimination in Sikhs. Major General Yash Mor is another such character. I firmly believe these people are not meritorious but joined the services through some kind of approach or Backdoor entry.
 
Ya'll DF and ES in 1992 during Ayodhya Shangarsh probably.

1000006482.webp
 
Tum se na ho payega Sanataniyo tum logo ke lakshan sahi na lgrahe
 
In Indian scenario... For throwing away a party in power in Delhi in Bangladesh style... The crowd encircling/attacking Delhi should be multi-ethnic/multi-lingual(not like khalistani farmer protest which badly affected other communities)... it should be a Pan-India massive discontent much more than what Indira gandhi faced during emergency... & most of all... opposition should be ruling atleast some of the four states that border Delhi viz. Haryana, Rajasthan, MP, UP. Otherwise crowds from opposition ruled states won't be allowed to pass through. All four currently are being ruled by BJP.

I mean no disrespect but such a crowd coming from south of Vindhyas is simply ruled out.

Last time the people who came from south of vindhyas were Marathas and they found massive support in North bcoz Mughals were enemies of all.

Now some member(s) were raising question whether the Indian army generals will support GOI in such case?

The Gernails won't be needed. Why? The early congis were visionary😇**##... They created the CAPF's for this very purpose... though this purpose was not exclusively stated. There are a million+ CAPF & the BJP ruled states bordering Delhi too have their police forces & if ever such situation arises there will be a counter mobilization of BJP/RSS Cadre.

75%+ of such crowd... if it ever appears will be made up of Mullahs & Bhimtas... that in itself will irk majority of the Hindus especially in North. Counter mobilization would be massive.

So the prevalent conditions are not suitable for a forceful overthrow of BJP.


(**##Like Bhallaldeva said before going against/killing his mother Shivagami devi... "Phir Main to itna neech hoon... apni suraksha ka dhyan nahi rakhunga". Same way early congis did all arrangements to avoid such situation)
You just used too much bandwidth - both internet as well as your own brainwave thinking about a scenario that's impossible in current scenario.
 
View attachment 16550

Ex ampaasidor.

"A Bangladesh type boycott threat may force transparency & reform".

These are the two bit d***** who furthered (?) India's interests while being a diplomat & are supposed to do that after retirement.

A "Bangladesh type boycott" is a call for treason against India & its people.

S*bversives who keep taking about non existent manipulation - straight out of western regime change operation.

Indians should do all that is necessary to squat the threat to our democracy if it come to that.
Having one regional party win every election having good Side effect,

Thare are not concensus being made by opposition parties to completely boycott elections and go for revolution.

Personal greed of local parties are forcing democracy.
 
for kids who were too young to remember 2008 mumbai attack
this type of live reporting continued till a few years into modi first term.
=====
"I have been talking to some people inside the hotel....they are on 19th floor...."

And this is how Barkha Dutt informed the handlers of terrorists sitting in Pakistan about the whereabouts of the people hiding in Taj Hotel.

Handlers of 26/11 terrorists watched Barkha Dutt reporting on TV to know the real time information of what Govt & security forces are planning.


View: https://x.com/Incognito_qfs/status/1861251435486150904


kargil

1732605432587.webp
 
How it is impossible ? Please elaborate.
He already elaborated several points.

For Bangladesh like incident to happen you need a few contributors :

1. Extreme grievance among significant number of people. Missing here. Except those whose bread and butter is politics, very few people has extreme grievance against the Govt. unhappy doesn't equate to grievance. And mullahs don't count. As a matter of fact if mullahs unite, the majority hindus will unite too in counter. See what happened in MH in last election? The loud demands of mullahs to congoons counter-consolidated Hindus to come out and vote giving Mahayuti a landslide victory.

2. Inability of the incumbent party to counter-mobilise is also another thing that contributed in Bangladesh'es case. BJP doesn't lack in mass power.

3. Ineffective rule of law. Bangladesh never had effective rule of law. Their constitution itself is a farce. In India people might not like how the law works, but most people at some level abides by the law. So, you will be hard pressed to find the overwhelming number that will be needed to bear down the Govt in centre. Even Indira Gandhi couldn't be weighed down despite her becoming thoroughly unpopular. Even during the popular movement led against Indira, the massive protests rarely turned violent. She ultimately was thrown out through election defeat.

4. Size of the nation. Dhaka being the both political and economical capital of BD, it was easy to seize and cause destabilisation and spread it through BD. India is not concentrated in Delhi only. Even during CAA and so called farmer's agitation, nothing changed in India except for few people living near the protest sites. Nobody cared enough to cause even a stir in the economical front of India. For such effect simultaneous seizure of Mumbai, Delhi and other metros have to happen. But given how politics and motivation is always different in each metros due to language and regional issues, how likely is that?

5. Leadership of the opposition is also a primary factor in such a mass agitation to build up and then persevere before it finally succeeds. In BD, the leadership was effectively hijacked by the mullahs from the so called students soon after the protest entered violent phase. Mullahs provided jihadis as foot soldiers in huge numbers who hid behind the students and did the actual violence. Both Jihadis during CAA and Khalistanis during farmers' protest tried it in Delhi, but massively failed both times.

6. Breaking the foreign hand is always a factor to nip such efforts at the bud. Hasina couldn't do that because BD is heavily reliant on foreign investment. India too is dependant on foreign investment, yet it has built its own economy at such a level that it can stare down the foreign govts. Hasina wasn't successful in countering CIA-backed Soros'es pets from causing the trouble for her. She couldn't coz she was facing a sudden economical upheaval resulted out of Covid. Her economy literally depended on the orders from overseas by MNCs who are largely controlled by Soros'es cabal. India has gotten big enough that they can take such actors to task within India and send message across the ocean to their masters. Heck, India in recent time has been turning into Dragon diplomacy of China where so called developed nations are regularly taken to task for their hypocrisy.

7. Now, about the security matters. The CAPFs are powerful enough to control any mass agitation in India. India is not reliant upon army like BD. In fact, army within itself has enough check and balance to negate concentration of power under on CoAS and by extent to negate chance of any coup. The CoAS is an administrative head when an Lt. General takes care of DGMO and there are additional 5 commands that effectively control the troops. Even to pull an unofficial coup like BD, CoAS has to take in confidence senior most officers of Central and Northern Command including Vice Chief and DGMO. Military discipline alone wouldn't have such senior officers nodding to CoAS'es unconstitutional orders in India. And forget about some Corps commander to pull a coup.

8. As for the concern about certain ethnicity or religion based regiments trying anything, since HQ of most such regiments hardly ever is placed in their native, they wouldn't be able to gather enough logistical support to cause anything more than a stir at best before they are subdued. Also, the various regiments are united only by their ethos of patriotism toward mother India, and their ethnicity, religion and interest is diverse enough that the jehadification that has happened of BD army, is impossible for Indian army.
 
He already elaborated several points.

For Bangladesh like incident to happen you need a few contributors :

1. Extreme grievance among significant number of people. Missing here. Except those whose bread and butter is politics, very few people has extreme grievance against the Govt. unhappy doesn't equate to grievance. And mullahs don't count. As a matter of fact if mullahs unite, the majority hindus will unite too in counter. See what happened in MH in last election? The loud demands of mullahs to congoons counter-consolidated Hindus to come out and vote giving Mahayuti a landslide victory.

2. Inability of the incumbent party to counter-mobilise is also another thing that contributed in Bangladesh'es case. BJP doesn't lack in mass power.

3. Ineffective rule of law. Bangladesh never had effective rule of law. Their constitution itself is a farce. In India people might not like how the law works, but most people at some level abides by the law. So, you will be hard pressed to find the overwhelming number that will be needed to bear down the Govt in centre. Even Indira Gandhi couldn't be weighed down despite her becoming thoroughly unpopular. Even during the popular movement led against Indira, the massive protests rarely turned violent. She ultimately was thrown out through election defeat.

4. Size of the nation. Dhaka being the both political and economical capital of BD, it was easy to seize and cause destabilisation and spread it through BD. India is not concentrated in Delhi only. Even during CAA and so called farmer's agitation, nothing changed in India except for few people living near the protest sites. Nobody cared enough to cause even a stir in the economical front of India. For such effect simultaneous seizure of Mumbai, Delhi and other metros have to happen. But given how politics and motivation is always different in each metros due to language and regional issues, how likely is that?

5. Leadership of the opposition is also a primary factor in such a mass agitation to build up and then persevere before it finally succeeds. In BD, the leadership was effectively hijacked by the mullahs from the so called students soon after the protest entered violent phase. Mullahs provided jihadis as foot soldiers in huge numbers who hid behind the students and did the actual violence. Both Jihadis during CAA and Khalistanis during farmers' protest tried it in Delhi, but massively failed both times.

6. Breaking the foreign hand is always a factor to nip such efforts at the bud. Hasina couldn't do that because BD is heavily reliant on foreign investment. India too is dependant on foreign investment, yet it has built its own economy at such a level that it can stare down the foreign govts. Hasina wasn't successful in countering CIA-backed Soros'es pets from causing the trouble for her. She couldn't coz she was facing a sudden economical upheaval resulted out of Covid. Her economy literally depended on the orders from overseas by MNCs who are largely controlled by Soros'es cabal. India has gotten big enough that they can take such actors to task within India and send message across the ocean to their masters. Heck, India in recent time has been turning into Dragon diplomacy of China where so called developed nations are regularly taken to task for their hypocrisy.

7. Now, about the security matters. The CAPFs are powerful enough to control any mass agitation in India. India is not reliant upon army like BD. In fact, army within itself has enough check and balance to negate concentration of power under on CoAS and by extent to negate chance of any coup. The CoAS is an administrative head when an Lt. General takes care of DGMO and there are additional 5 commands that effectively control the troops. Even to pull an unofficial coup like BD, CoAS has to take in confidence senior most officers of Central and Northern Command including Vice Chief and DGMO. Military discipline alone wouldn't have such senior officers nodding to CoAS'es unconstitutional orders in India. And forget about some Corps commander to pull a coup.

8. As for the concern about certain ethnicity or religion based regiments trying anything, since HQ of most such regiments hardly ever is placed in their native, they wouldn't be able to gather enough logistical support to cause anything more than a stir at best before they are subdued. Also, the various regiments are united only by their ethos of patriotism toward mother India, and their ethnicity, religion and interest is diverse enough that the jehadification that has happened of BD army, is impossible for Indian army.

Nehrua sach mein visionary tha. He knew we had a long freedom struggle which went to and fro from violent to non-violent phase... thus he feared that him or his progeny too can be subjected to a revolution like his British forefathers.

He created all kinds of institutions and laws so that his progeny rules for long... & by default whosoever got the throne lives protected under the same cage of laws and institutions.

When he came to power his very first conspiracy was demonizing & genocide of Maharastrian Brahmins as soon as he got a prerext(killing of gandhi by godse)... bcoz it was under their leadership that Maratha Empire reached it's zenith by destroying the real forefathers of Nehru... the Mughals.
 

When you lose, EVMs are tampered; when you win, EVMs are not tampered’: SC junks PIL demanding a return to ballot paper voting​



Supreme Court rejects Dr KA Paul’s PIL for ballot paper voting, questioning motives and dismissing tampering claims

1732624377031.webp


Interesting, not the PIL per se.. but the fact that he mentions that he is coming from Los Angeles & that he has phull sappart from certain ex IAS/IPS/Judges.

1732624645847.webp

No proof, just some jargons
 
Two points to note.

1. PIL filed by an evangelist*

2. Who has come straight from Los Angeles, USA... (Ex-IAS/IPS/Judges)* are in his support.

Matlab pawns of CIA are openly coming out now...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241126_183650_X.webp
    Screenshot_20241126_183650_X.webp
    128.4 KB · Views: 15
  • Screenshot_20241126_183706_X.webp
    Screenshot_20241126_183706_X.webp
    47.9 KB · Views: 15

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top