- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 238
- Likes
- 1,030
Was there any option other than human wave tactics followed by arty bombardment in kargil? Airforce attacks by fighters and choppers had its own limitations plus they were called late .9 para lost 4 or 6 men in a single raid in Zulu against 13 paki men.Was use of SF against such targets justified?where SF were used for ops that were deemed difficult for infantry through frontal attacks?Let me also be brutally honest now..
After 71 the Army pretty much started loosing its edge.The primary reason for such was the degradation in officer quality in every decade.
The standards the British officers kept have long perished and JI Hazorri has become prevalent.
Sri Lanka was a massacre of Indian Army..SF got thrashed left right and centre..10 Para in particular if i am not mistaken paid a very heavy price.
Then came the disaster of Kargil…Army had no idea about infiltration..The shephard was treated very badly in the initial days coz Army thought he is crazy and disnt waste efforts in verifying his claims.
Meanwhile the Army was busy in making a ZOO.
Human wave tactics and the balidaan of young blood who were motivated along with an enemy who had no air power and reinforcements won us Kargil..Nothing else..no Generals and not even the stupid PM.
Then coming to Kashmir…40 years since the conflict…what have we invented?..Which tactics has Indian Army evolved…Most soldiers cant even do drills without taking the finger off trigger and flaghing their buddies.
Since 2021 SF is getting targeted..Whats the counter strategy?
Jumlebaazi…False i say again False sense of Machoism…False sense of superiority complex..has costed us very bad.
All airborne battalions are made SF without any resources and No New Airborne battalions are raised…Shows us how genius our Generals are.