On one side, we're running free food welfare schemes for 80 crore people, and on the other, want to host a useless event where the country has no standing.
View: https://x.com/IndianTechGuide/status/1817439847415533758?t=50mP9CcXI-FVcc4Z9RVqPQ&s=19
Cost of olympics is $40 to 60; India cannot afford that. Moreover, much of the income is pocketed by IOC. Hence, not a good feasible exercise.
Hosting Olympics makes no financial sense.
No Bro.
Hosting a Olympic a very big thing. It is totally make sense for India.
You spend money to build infrastructure which future generation can use. Suddenly India started wining medals in Olympics because we had built infrastructure during common wealth games.
It generates revenue, it generates PR, it's a sign of stability which brings investment.
Please don't fool by Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars repeate sentence "What about poors?? 50% population is Lives below 1.25$. these are all lies.
No Bro.
Hosting a Olympic a very big thing. It is totally make sense for India.
You spend money to build infrastructure which future generation can use. Suddenly India started wining medals in Olympics because we had built infrastructure during common wealth games.
It generates revenue, it generates PR, it's a sign of stability which brings investment.
Please don't fool by Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars repeate sentence "What about poors?? 50% population is Lives below 1.25$. these are all lies.
There is Asian games and Commonwealth games infrastructure in Delhi. Hardly used and decaying.
No Bro.
Hosting a Olympic a very big thing. It is totally make sense for India.
You spend money to build infrastructure which future generation can use. Suddenly India started wining medals in Olympics because we had built infrastructure during common wealth games.
It generates revenue, it generates PR, it's a sign of stability which brings investment.
Please don't fool by Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars repeate sentence "What about poors?? 50% population is Lives below 1.25$. these are all lies.
I am not fooled by the sentence, "What about the poor." I am coming from a place where most of the infrastructure that we built for the Olympics become white elephants becoming financial blackholes or sinks where we constantly lose money. Look at Greece or Montreal and see how they lost money and was not able to derive any long term benefits.
Dropping the Olympics hosting dream is better. We can spend the money on strengthening the current prospects like Archery, Shooting, Badminton, Hockey, TT, Athletics. May be improve the shitshow of wrestling and Boxing also.
It is not worth the money since we are building grounds up infra and chances are low for reuse. Good or Bad PR. At the end of the day Hindu Nationalist running the Olympics is the news Goras will say.
India is not a Greece, holding Olympics when you are bankrupt could be stupid decision.
You mean if we don't hold Olympics then your surroundings will become rich?? Absolutely not. Such examples were given for ISRO but you know now how benefits has outweighed investment.
People need to understand that corruption is main issue not the money. Civic sense is more important then money.
I give you an example here.
GoI had been distributed money several times for Home and latrine since 1950. But zero home and latrine were built due to corruption. When Modi government enrolled same scheme efficiently then results are visible clearly.
When Atal Bihari Vajpayee announced Golden quadrilateral Hi-way in india public went crazy. It was vehemently opposed by everyone while giving similar arguments like people giving here today.
Result is absolutely opposite. Be it an individual person or a country, you need to invest first for future growth.
Expecting growth without investment is a mere day dreaming.