- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 511
- Likes
- 3,512
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New article:
What Does the Chinese Public Think of the China-India Border Patrol Deal?
What Does the Chinese Public Think of the China-India Border Patrol Deal?
The first public reactions to the border agreement reflect a deep suspicion of New Delhi’s “cheap tricks” and fear that Beijing is being naive.thediplomat.com
India’s economy is in doldrums, India has fallen out with Canada, within the Quad group of four nations India recently differed with Japan and opposed the new Japanese prime minister Shigeru Ishiba’s idea of ‘Asian NATO,’ and foreign funds and technologies have not been flowing into India as expected. But more importantly, the Indian political elite is beginning to fear the return of Trump into the White House, so New Delhi is suddenly desirous of ‘normal’ business relations with China.
Excerpted from the article.
This is the reason I believe the Han to be a better version of Paxtan , a much more better version & they've plenty of achievements to back it up but the delusions are the same viz their impression that they've already dethroned the US & replaced them .
How much of it has to do with censorship or promotion of CCP narrative building or sense of superiority etc is a matter of debate.
Excerpted from the article.
This is the reason I believe the Han to be a better version of Paxtan , a much more better version to be precise & they've plenty of achievements to back it up as well but the delusions are the same viz their impression that they've already dethroned the US & replaced them .
How much of it has to do with censorship or promotion of CCP narrative building or sense of superiority etc is a matter of debate.
Indian economy in doldrums?
An afeemchi is saying this?
Why would the 'Indian political elite' fear Donald, who has been stuffing his cabinet with folks known for their hardcore anti china views?
And it was Trump who revived QUAD. Obama wanted to find middle ground with china.
L takes after L takes - truly the iron biradar of pakroaches.
I thought this was common sense. Nothing in China is what it seems.
The rate they are inducting ships, tanks, jets and developing infrastructure far outpaces any military. I have seen massive barracks and double-lane roads completed within months like it is Age of Empires.
They are pouring so much money that there are literally empty ghost towns and ghost highways going from nowhere to nowhere in the middle of Tibet.
Take the US military's imitation of DJI's RQ-28A unmanned aerial vehicle as an example. This aircraft is inferior to ordinary DJI quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicles in terms of data transmission and endurance. The basic version of the RQ-28A has a unit price of as high as $80,000, and the infrared version is even as high as $140,000. In contrast, in 2018, the US Air Force spent $190,000 to purchase 35 DJI Mavic Pro Platinum Editions. The unit price difference is more than 10-20 times. Therefore, the $25 million procurement budget requested by the US Army may seem large, but the number of unmanned aerial vehicles that can be purchased will shrink by at least 90%.
To be fair, we have seen this to be true in every single command economy - from current day China to Stalinist USSR to post 50s north korea - command economies are extremely prolific in turning out a YUUUGE quantity of military armaments in record time and building a metric crap ton of roads and railways in record time.I thought this was common sense. Nothing in China is what it seems.
The rate they are inducting ships, tanks, jets and developing infrastructure far outpaces any military. I have seen massive barracks and double-lane roads completed within months like it is Age of Empires.
They are pouring so much money that there are literally empty ghost towns and ghost highways going from nowhere to nowhere in the middle of Tibet.
To be fair, we have seen this to be true in every single command economy - from current day China to Stalinist USSR to post 50s north korea - command economies are extremely prolific in turning out a YUUUGE quantity of military armaments in record time and building a metric crap ton of roads and railways in record time.
They may suck in quality, but i have no reason to doubt Chinese output data in these fields, given that they are consistent with other command economies shitting out military equipment and infra as if they have diarrhea.
your agreement or disagreement to objectively factually driven comparisons is irrelevant.I personally don't agree with it.
Command economies exist in any military organization, it's called Military Economics / Defence Economics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_defense).
Underneath Military Economic, there is civil economy. Deng Xiaoping made life time efforts to make Chinese economy being free market. My previous post above yours, were evidences because of Chinese free and competitive civil industry, enchanced Chinese defence ecomoics, strong and efficient.
If Huawei had biggest share in telecom equipments in the world, PLA's C4SI won't be that bad. If DJI owns 80% share in civil market, PLA's military drone should be cheap and advanced enough. If China had 30 million civil vehicle production capabilities as it now, it surely has ability to make 200,000 Tanks during the war time.
Amerifat fear mongering also plays into this.Excerpted from the article.
This is the reason I believe the Han to be a better version of Paxtan , a much more better version to be precise & they've plenty of achievements to back it up as well but the delusions are the same viz their impression that they've already dethroned the US & replaced them .
How much of it has to do with censorship or promotion of CCP narrative building or sense of superiority etc is a matter of debate.