Indo-China Border & LAC

Not likely to happen that India will allow a huge Chinese investment in India, until the Chinese completely disengage at all of LAC.

Moreover, Chinese have nothing to offer. They have stolen tech and poor quality products which are cheap but last only three years.
I think this is a misconception. Chinese have a huge amount of tech which is sourceable from China. However, Chinese will not share this technology with India but they will rather disrupt local players. India should focus on building domestic equivalents to large Chinese players. I wouldn’t write them off as you suggest. India should invest in the latest lithographic machines and chip manufacturing processes.
 
I think this is a misconception. Chinese have a huge amount of tech which is sourceable from China. However, Chinese will not share this technology with India but they will rather disrupt local players. India should focus on building domestic equivalents to large Chinese players. I wouldn’t write them off as you suggest. India should invest in the latest lithographic machines and chip manufacturing processes.
BS
 
LOL "New Weapon" and then my guy goes and makes an entire video about fuckin technicals! A 90s innovation!
But yeah definitely could be used in our case for shoot and scoot!
Depends on what's your perspective on new weapons I guess. I once read a retired senior USAF general quip if we knew piston engined aircrafts would make a comeback in the 21st century we'd have never stopped development on the Hawk , Hellcat , Wildcat , Mustang , Spitfire & what have you .
 
lol. LiDARs, integrated cameras and high speed signal processing is some of the areas where China is beating Japan and South Korea. I can name a half dozen more. I have personally tried to get PCBs made by Indian vendors and the ease of getting it done in China is 10x in terms of customer service, willingness to do small volumes. India should focus on improving these shortcomings, so it attracts more business. If you are not tech savvy, I would refrain from commenting.
 
In terms of algorithms, they are ahead of the US when it comes to real time mapping, localization, perception models. Only Tesla beats them, but the Chinese OEMs are ahead of Ford and GM
 
It's both.
sense of superiority is a result.

They are only shown their own strengths and the weaknesses of the West, therefore their mindsets is that they are Numba Wan and the West is nothing
over 100 years ago a Chinese author parodied this han civilizational mindset

The True Story of Ah Q
Its story of Chinese man marked by "cowardice, opportunism, megalomania, and excessive self-esteem."

"The story is centered around Ah Q, who always uses his idea of the spirit of victory to comfort himself after every failure. When he faces people who have a higher social status than him, he uses his spirit of victory by depreciating himself to release the pain that is caused by those people. However, when he faces people who have a similar or lower social status than him, he uses his spirit of victory by using violence on those people to show his "strength", which shows his personality of bullying the weak and fearing the strong"

Somethings never change I guess 🙄

Don't be surprised one day a Han claims rape of Nanking as a Chinese spirit of victory" because it made Imperial Japanese troops waste their semen on Han women rather than Japanese ones.
 


"signalling" for China .

in a war , we will go for chumbi and tibet territory across middle sector , opposite himachal uttarakand

funny but i dont think china will post these kinda vids now . havent seen any this specific from them in a long time


View: https://x.com/trishakticorps/status/1863923403477909981



:rolleyes: very surface level , seems like he used chatgpt.
 
"signalling" for China .

in a war , we will go for chumbi and tibet territory across middle sector , opposite himachal uttarakand

funny but i dont think china will post these kinda vids now . havent seen any this specific from them in a long time


View: https://x.com/trishakticorps/status/1863923403477909981



:rolleyes: very surface level , seems like he used chatgpt.

He's just the narrator, they have got dedicated teams for research but as it turns out, those dweebs are phenomenally inept at their job.
 
over 100 years ago a Chinese author parodied this han civilizational mindset

The True Story of Ah Q
Its story of Chinese man marked by "cowardice, opportunism, megalomania, and excessive self-esteem."

"The story is centered around Ah Q, who always uses his idea of the spirit of victory to comfort himself after every failure. When he faces people who have a higher social status than him, he uses his spirit of victory by depreciating himself to release the pain that is caused by those people. However, when he faces people who have a similar or lower social status than him, he uses his spirit of victory by using violence on those people to show his "strength", which shows his personality of bullying the weak and fearing the strong"

Somethings never change I guess 🙄

Don't be surprised one day a Han claims rape of Nanking as a Chinese spirit of victory" because it made Imperial Japanese troops waste their semen on Han women rather than Japanese ones.

This is a facet that is fundamental to the Chinese psyche & civilization. To understand this, one must understand the core genesis of Chinese history, the same with Indian history.
The key difference between Indian & Chinese history, is that post Indus Valley, we've had several locuses of Indian civilization: the two main poles of the north were the Magadh region vs the Kuru-Panchala region, a divide we see prior to and after the collapse of Magadh empire period itself. We also had two major focii in the south : one in the north telengana/interior MAH region and other in the Tamil plains.
All these focii interacted with one another and while some focii became dominant/merged culturally ( like the northern focii did to a large degree), China never had this feature.

The Chinese civilization is a one focii growth civilization, that is basically Erlitou civilization-->Shang-->Zhou-->Warring States -->Chin Empire-->Han Empire (Beginning of China proper) progression, continuously expanding from its han river focii over the last 4000+ years.

Its singular view has always been 'we are civilized surrounded on all sides by barbarians' as a central core concept of civilization and over time, when it came in contact with people that are not barbarian to the Chinese ( the chinese concept of barbarian is simple - those who live in skin/fur tents or those who live in forest villages), they retained the 'yes but we are the MOST civilized of them all' mentality.

This is reflected throughout Chinese history, where one salient fact of forming official relations with China **ALWAYS** meant paying official homage to the Chinese emperor, even if its just a simple trade mission.
Many entities did fyi too - the cholas, vijayanagara, harsha, romans, sassasnids did - simply because they saw it as 'this is chinese ego massaging for trade relations'. Chinese irridentists often use these to claim Chinese control/influence well beyond its actual de-facto and de-jure regions due to this quirk of chinese official diplomacy through the ages, that is a facet of their singular focii cultural expansion.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

VPN-HSL-250-X250
Back
Top