Lolipop for Trumpwa, i guess
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All depend if you want it 10 / year or 20 / year or....I've long maintained that we just don't have the kind of CAPEX needed for 114 jet order
First piece of BS of the month:best Bull Shit of of month.
You really are an ace.....
My sympathies bruh...if even after all this GE engine fracas (which I still suspect is not entirely a genuine delay) the GoI and MoD and Finmin Babus don't fund Kaveri engine dev massively and force a concerted effort from both public and pvt industry to get a working engine to be put into atleast AMCA or Tejas MK2 later production units, then yea IAF is utterly doomed. USA will and can kill the GE engines any time it chooses even after they have been delivered and integrated. We are utter fools to have placed our only successful fighter line in the hands of the one who is an expert in twisting the two round things at the base of males.There's no hope left for Imported Airforce . It's all over for us .
At this rate pakistan might offer us jf17 as no GE engines are in sightMy sympathies bruh...if even after all this GE engine fracas (which I still suspect is not entirely a genuine delay) the GoI and MoD and Finmin Babus don't fund Kaveri engine dev massively and force a concerted effort from both public and pvt industry to get a working engine to be put into atleast AMCA or Tejas MK2 later production units, then yea IAF is utterly doomed. USA will and can kill the GE engines any time it chooses even after they have been delivered and integrated. We are utter fools to have placed our only successful fighter line in the hands of the one who is an expert in twisting the two round things at the base of males.
Then buy the Russian jet. We already have a lot of Russian jets. Will make it easier for supply chain purposes and Russians may be more willing to set up local supply chain and whatnot.
American fighter jets are gone case now, even if trump sell us jets the next government may stop the delivery.Two critical news as per me...
IAF had been planning to eliminate the Russian fighters in the 1st place, they didn't need Su-35 & Mig-35 failed in some technical trials.
Next is that IAF dropped integration of Uttam & Astra, Rudram etc. to the Rafale-M jets, due to the high cost to be paid to the French side for the modifications and the estimated 8-year timeline for completing the integration.
I think we do desperately need another 2nd source of fighters jets induction (kinda like Talwar class frigates for Navy), a smaller number if not 114 due to cost.
Rafale is having indigenisation-vs-cost roadblock, otherwise had greatest chance. Price issue is better for SH-18, will also allow commonality of engineers with MWF & AMCA, but it'd have been a more likely candidate is Naval F-18 was taken instead of Rafale-M.
Lastly I think Mig-35 gives us a negotiation edge. We already operate 62+43 Mig-29 SMT & Ks remaining. They're gonna get Uttam, Astra etc. We could cut a similar deal for Mig-35 utilising Russia's situation for a 3D TVC engine that can reduce our dependency on American 100kN class engines.
Su+-7 is completely out of the picture by now... Even Su-75 Checkmate isn't on offer, meaning is still at wooden mock-up stage.American fighter jets are gone case now, even if trump sell us jets the next government may stop the delivery.
Your plan was the indian one 30 years ago, at least.Rafale is a paper tiger. Halve the budget for MMRCA. Take half of the half and put it entirely into Kaveri, fund that thing until there's an engine. Take the remaining half and fund LCA entirely. Make it 100% indigenous, nothing foreign. Then buy the Russian jet. We already have a lot of Russian jets. Will make it easier for supply chain purposes and Russians may be more willing to set up local supply chain and whatnot.
Wrong.As things were left 10 years ago, Dassault and India could not agree terms to build Rafale on an Indian assembly line.
Yes, but they only have to pay a very limited fine because they were just a little bit late.Dassault did not honour its offset agreements with the deal for 36 Rafale. That does not demonstrate a willing to co-operate in deals eg ToT.
All but not mature.Who knows, may be Koreans bring their KF-21 to the competition.
It's not the whole truth.Next is that IAF dropped integration of Uttam & Astra, Rudram etc. to the Rafale-M jets, due to the high cost to be paid to the French side for the modifications and the estimated 8-year timeline for completing the integration.
https://www.business-standard.com/a...-jets-here-s-what-we-know-124093000356_1.html
What would be the point of integrating UTTAM on Rafale? Sounds like integration for its own sake. If it works, don't fix it (and spend lots of money in the process).It's not the whole truth.
Yes UTAAM integration would be very coslty. But Astra integration is say to be on track. Rudram I don't know (this subject is very new).