Operation Sindoor & Aftermath (31 Viewers)

There are no Porki nukes, there are old Ameriki nukes. So India could invade and reach Islamabad and there would be no nukes fired. America will though protect its whore.

Rafales without source code for us to integrate our systems is not a good option. US jets are a no go due to constraints they will put. AMCA is decade away if that.

So only viable option.


View: https://x.com/RealBababanaras/status/1947885857471664525?t=MqAfq8X7zl3mqg1BVRmIGg&s=19

I doubt this news. But anything is acceptable except American garbage with strings attached.
India should stay away from USA and its pets. No matter what they will support terrorist nation porky. It’s their own pet.
We can’t take order like other nations because we never had such relationship with USA.
For quick buying options are only su57 and Rafale with production inside india.

With France we can have tie up but problem is limit they have on technology and equipment. Most importantly we can’t integrate our own equipment or modification on them.

So only option left is Russia hope something finalised when Putin visit india .
 
I actually think he could cryptically be talking about PAF losing fighters in that failed attempt at an attack ("Bunyan al Whatever the Fuck")
No he will never do that. He needs Chamcha. And no better pleaser than pork. They will sell their soul for a few dollor.
He is totally anti india and paki lover . He is saying things just to piss us off.
 
There are no Porki nukes, there are old Ameriki nukes. So India could invade and reach Islamabad and there would be no nukes fired. America will though protect its whore.

Rafales without source code for us to integrate our systems is not a good option. US jets are a no go due to constraints they will put. AMCA is decade away if that.

So only viable option.


View: https://x.com/RealBababanaras/status/1947885857471664525?t=MqAfq8X7zl3mqg1BVRmIGg&s=19


Source is his gaand.. 😂

I would love this to be true, i am a big fan of Ruski gear and the fact there are no strings attached.

But this is bs 100%>
 
Most of the budget goes towards sc st and non hindu welfare and freebies .
This is right.

Madrchd caste survey karwayenge to push for 100% quota after identifying which groups to appease the most.

Millions being spent every day to create free housing for slum dwellers and encroachers, energy subsidies, freebies for farmers and thousands of other handouts.

Politician breed hi kutti hai (no offence to dogs).

Despite all the BJP cocksucking, defence spending is not a priority. Watch out for another two decades of MRFA drama.

They used to be a hindutva party, now they have just sold out. Muzzies are running amok in many BJP/NDA states. The RSS Spirit has gone out, replaced by pesudo secularist 'sabka vikaas' bullshit narrative.

Military rule chahiye for two-three decades.
 
There are videos of 2 different SAM explosions (possible interceptions) from Shorkot that night.

Based on Pak OSINT, there are debris pics/videos of 3 Indian missile [2x Brahmos (one each in Jacobabad & Shorkot), 1x Scalp-EG (Sargodha)], the Scalp was definitely a malfunction as missile body had no shrapnel, burn marks and was relatively intact compared to brahmos debris.

Pakistani source for Shorkot's brahmos debris pics

View: https://x.com/VigorousFalcon/status/1922580608670199952


Yes, Jacobabad was in particular a lucky one for them, it was a last second interception just on the outskirts of the base as Brahmos dove in towards the target (maybe same hangar that was hit). Could have been done by SPADA-2000.

Rafiqui one was a bit further away. Most likely by HQ-16 LOMADS unlikely to be HQ-9.


View: https://x.com/OsintTV/status/1933027770373923088

View: https://x.com/SouleFacts/status/1921158306665484778


This is just a massive assumption. No proof of anywhere of BrahMos being "intercepted" or "shot down".

All I see is a BrahMos debris, another one seems like a crash site of something "bigger" than BrahMos (fighter jet?).

Possible things that could have happened -
  1. Mission aborted (confirmed that after ceasefire live mission was aborted).
  2. Missle missed due to faulty guidance or seeker.
  3. Missile shot down but past records indicate this chance to be slim.
Even if we assume all 3 has equal probability, chances of it being shot down is only 30%, however we all know option 2 is likey reason.
 

Okay, now this is probably a noob question but is sending tangos with MANPADs across the LoC the new normal now? Also, were they taken care of? Asking this because we have come across reports of BSF etc hunting down tangos during Op Sindoor.

Also, was there any truth to all those reports of a fidayeen attack at Rajourie?
 
Okay, now this is probably a noob question but is sending tangos with MANPADs across the LoC the new normal now?

This worries me more than any IAF losses.

Also, were they taken care of? Asking this because we have come across reports of BSF etc hunting down tangos during Op Sindoor.

Not that I know of.

Also, was there any truth to all those reports of a fidayeen attack at Rajourie?

No. OGWs spread rumours to create unrest.
 
Okay, now this is probably a noob question but is sending tangos with MANPADs across the LoC the new normal now? Also, were they taken care of? Asking this because we have come across reports of BSF etc hunting down tangos during Op Sindoor.

Also, was there any truth to all those reports of a fidayeen attack at Rajourie?
Rajouri confirm - No fedayeen attack. Its heavily fortified. The nemesis of those Porkies RR - Romeo F is there to send them to 72 hrs. From Akhnoor to Nowshera , Rajouri , up to Poonch all are hot sectors. All the time patrolling is vigilant. MANPADS from LOC is a threat for low flying vectors. Poonch is bang on LOC. So that threat will be there esp . Rest be assured. That's why Terrorists tried Samba and Kathua sector.
BTW there was GPS issue in Jammu how come i have no idea. Perhaps SAMYUKTA was working. Iphones locations started showing near Sialkot :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
SU-35 is created to better SU-30 MKI specially…

With better engine and better upgrade potential
Not entirely true.
Su-35 is basically a slightly better Air Superiority fighter than Su30 but at the cost of humongous lift capacity reduction.
Su35 range is 3600km on internal fuel ( so 1800km combat radius), while Su30Mki is 3000km, su35 can attack su-30 from above, since its got higher service ceiling (18K feet vs 17.5K feet) but su30mki can lift 10.5 tonnes on full tank of gas, while Su35 can lift 4 tonnes on full fuel tank.
Su-35 has better radar and more modern engine, its slightly better dog-fighter, but it wont age as well as Su30mki will, which, when its era of air superiority is over, will be converted into a flying bomb truck coz ability to deliver 10.5 tonnes of hurt to a distance of 1500km and come back without any refuelling is nothing to sneeze at and barring us making a heavy bomber, Su-30mki will be our fighter-bomber for decades to come.
 
Yes, Jacobabad was in particular a lucky one for them, it was a last second interception just on the outskirts of the base as Brahmos dove in towards the target (maybe same hangar that was hit). Could have been done by SPADA-2000.

Rafiqui one was a bit further away. Most likely by HQ-16 LOMADS unlikely to be HQ-9.


View: https://x.com/OsintTV/status/1933027770373923088

View: https://x.com/SouleFacts/status/1921158306665484778

dude you gotta stop posting random gossip nonsense from nonsense accounts on teetaar.
These are not experts and the site deserves better than total idiots.

Pakistan doesnt have phalanx system or anything that can intercept a mach 3 cruise missile in terminal phase.
I thoughtyou'd learn your lesson from peddling paki BS about downing twin engine craft without any shred of evidence, now you are presenting some random paki video- which can be debris from their own downed missile, a scalp, a hammer, anything- as brahmos.
You wont last here long if you keep peddling paki propaganda.
 
Su 35 has slightly better mtow than Su 30, slightly better t/w and slightly better highest altitude capability.

We don't need Su 35 but it's engines for use in su 30 mki.
 
dude you gotta stop posting random gossip nonsense from nonsense accounts on teetaar.
These are not experts and the site deserves better than total idiots.

Pakistan doesnt have phalanx system or anything that can intercept a mach 3 cruise missile in terminal phase.
I thoughtyou'd learn your lesson from peddling paki BS about downing twin engine craft without any shred of evidence, now you are presenting some random paki video- which can be debris from their own downed missile, a scalp, a hammer, anything- as brahmos.
You wont last here long if you keep peddling paki propaganda.
Dude I don't want to lose my brain cells dealing with your mental gymnastics. I am just going to ignore you.

I will keep posting stuff that I hope drives some objective discussions. I don't want to add to some jingoistic echo chamber which I think you expect this forum to be.

If I am going to get banned then so be it. It's not like my life depends upon it.
 
Dude I don't want to lose my brain cells dealing with your mental gymnastics. I am just going to ignore you.

I will keep posting stuff that I hope drives some objective discussions. I don't want to add to some jingoistic echo chamber which I think you expect this forum to be.

If I am going to get banned then so be it. It's not like my life depends upon it.
uh huh.valid concerns that have never happened in aviation are mental gymnastics.But posting random teetaar as evidence, when they cant even get location of shorkot right, is smartness. You are throwing in paki propaganda and that isnt objective or evidence driven. which will see you out of the door soon.
 
Su 35 has slightly better mtow than Su 30, slightly better t/w and slightly better highest altitude capability.

We don't need Su 35 but it's engines for use in su 30 mki.
Su30mki mtow is 38.8 tonnes, su35 is 34.5 tonnes.
Su30mki empty weight is 18.4tonnes with 9.6 tonnes of internal fuel capacity. yeilding a pilot+payload capacity of 38.8-18.4-9.6 = 10.8tonnes
Su35S empty weight is 19 tonnes, with 11.5 tonnes of internal fuel capacity, yeilding a pilot + payload cpacity of 34.5-19-11.5 = 4 tonnes.
Which is sufficient for A2A roles and as i said, Su35S is designed to be a better A2A combat plane, aka Air superiority, at the expense of Mtow and lift capacity.
 
same same but better
It's not better.

For one the Indian AESA radar proposed to be on the Su 30 upgrade is better than the PESA radar on the Su 35

I don't have anything against buying Su 35 as it would beef up numbers and is very close to the Su 30 so maintainence won't be an issue.

The Su 57 is a not a real stealth aircraft though they have some interesting technologies which can help India with the AMCA.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom