Operation Sindoor and Aftermath

[shade2]

Let there be no doubt that the “new normal” notwithstanding, this deterrent can only be sustained by maintaining an overwhelming technological and military edge, which must be economically out of reach of Pakistan. With near–technological parity, the armed forces have delivered this recent victory by the skin of their teeth. Indian Armed Forces need to be transformed, and this requires political focus. It’s crucial that the defence budget is doubled to 4 per cent of the GDP.

View: https://x.com/rwac48/status/1922937093933891965?t=-h6xSPol1Jg3bWOhL4-aLw&s=19

I also give phull sapport to 4% of GDP as defense spending.

However bulk must be spend on domestic development and production and tech acquisition from foreign sources.

Most of these 4% shills just happen to be dallas for Uncle Sam, like the fat hoe who writes for the same Coupta's rag

Mere crumbs of the 4% must go to the Amerisharts.

 

[Numero]

View: https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/1922987351527092265

 

[silentassassin265]

I also give phull sapport to 4% of GDP as defense spending.

However bulk must be spend on domestic development and production and tech acquisition from foreign sources.

Most of these 4% shills just happen to be dallas for Uncle Sam, like the fat hoe who writes for the same Coupta's rag

Mere crumbs of the 4% must go to the Amerisharts.

Increasing budget is only possible if we earn from defence export.
Right now most of our experts are paid through line of credits we provide

 

[Master of Indus]

View: https://www.youtube.com/live/3T2moJde7Ao?si=KsrulxmNq2f-iggM

Another Must Watch!

 

[ezsasa]

Let there be no doubt that the “new normal” notwithstanding, this deterrent can only be sustained by maintaining an overwhelming technological and military edge, which must be economically out of reach of Pakistan. With near–technological parity, the armed forces have delivered this recent victory by the skin of their teeth. Indian Armed Forces need to be transformed, and this requires political focus. It’s crucial that the defence budget is doubled to 4 per cent of the GDP.

View: https://x.com/rwac48/status/1922937093933891965?t=-h6xSPol1Jg3bWOhL4-aLw&s=19

on this supposed air battle on 7th with 80+40 jets in sky, that info is available only from paki briefing.
IAF has not given out any such details, is it not?

 

[Aditya10r]

I also give phull sapport to 4% of GDP as defense spending.

However bulk must be spend on domestic development and production and tech acquisition from foreign sources.

Most of these 4% shills just happen to be dallas for Uncle Sam, like the fat hoe who writes for the same Coupta's rag

Mere crumbs of the 4% must go to the Amerisharts.

Dude, 2.5-3% is the sweet spot for us. A 7 trillion USD economy by 2030, spending 2.5-3% means we are spending close to 180- 210 billion USD. With purchasing power parity and local development of most of the equipment, economies of scale, and hopefully, tighter procurement timelines, can ensure efficient and cheaper pricing. 4% is not required in present scenario. 2.5-3% is good enough.

 

[Anupu]

View: https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/1922987351527092265

BKL sirsa missile se daar gaye. And intervened when there doggy Pakis were getting their whooped.

 

[concard]

One thing India must learn when confronting Pakistan and China in a potential conflict is that destroying their entire military infrastructure and defeating thousands of personnel, while significant, will not ensure complete victory. To truly succeed, India must also wage a parallel narrative and psychological war to win over public perception. Modern warfare requires a dual-front strategy, blending physical dominance with efforts to shape minds and narratives.

Let me tell you, if our forces destroy their military assets and kill their military personnel and make territorial gains, none of their psy-ops matters. You can't spin territorial loss as anything but a loss. More than anything we must equip ourselves to fight a long brutal war to reset Asia order. If China is willing to fight a war it is a short one not a long one. So we better be prepared for the long haul.

 

[Blood+]

>AI
>Cyber Warfare

Is this Field Marshall Sawnstein's Pedofile forum account?

I don't know what they smoke, but I sure wish I knew, would be one hell of a party with that those lads.

 

[shade2]

I don't know what they smoke, but I sure wish I knew, would be one hell of a party with the lads.

Fresh Afeem -e- Afghan paijaan

 

[Blood+]

Let me tell you, if our forces destroy their military assets and kill their military personnel and make territorial gains, none of their psy-ops matters. You can't spin territorial loss as anything but a loss. More than anything we must equip ourselves to fight a long brutal war to reset Asia order. If China is willing to fight a war it is a short one not a long one. So we better be prepared for the long haul.

Nah, I'm sure they'll somehow find a way even then. Like how the Russians have been retreating forward and Ukrainians have been advancing backwards from the start of that war.

 

[MasterChief]

View: https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/1922987351527092265

Ok.. Take this Nobel Prize and Shut up..

 

[jazzy_b]

Some one tell tom cooper guy to remove chahat fateh ali khan as pakistani pilot name from his data.

 

[Guynxdor]

View: https://x.com/ndtvprofitindia/status/1922999116860133586?s=46&t=s5Zjz3wgeVF4a5zNfD4EYA

 

[haldilal]

 

[pythonlover]

Let me tell you, if our forces destroy their military assets and kill their military personnel and make territorial gains, none of their psy-ops matters. You can't spin territorial loss as anything but a loss. More than anything we must equip ourselves to fight a long brutal war to reset Asia order. If China is willing to fight a war it is a short one not a long one. So we better be prepared for the long haul.

Are you sure one cannot spin territorial loss as victory? Doesn't Ukraine does the same thing? Didn't Finland in WW2 also do the same thing, spin territorial loss as victory?

See Pakis are the most shameless and deluded bunch. One cannot find a more shameless person than a Paki. When it will come to territorial loss, their arguments would be "may be we lost some territory, but we killed 10x more soldiers or 10x more aircraft or 10x more ships than we lost against so much bigger country. See that's a victory!" or "someone someone (Bangladeshis in 1971 or Sharif in Kargil) betrayed us, hence we pulled back. Otherwise we were winning!".

There is no narrative victory against a population so much brain washed in its own religious and martial superiority that it is figuratively schizophrenic. Pakis hallucinate and delude themselves. It is like once they reach adulthood, every Paki contracts schizophrenia.

 

[shade2]

View attachment 35962

This is legit news, All patrakars are covering it even though articles aren't up


View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1922999940566950363


View: https://x.com/DeccanChronicle/status/1922998792363663860

 

[Hindaviswarajya]

Let’s see how many guys still want to go in the lap of America .
Modi committed a big mistake by supporting USA . They are not trust worthy and will always support Pakistan.
All those who were saying USA might support india in war . It’s a tight slap on their faces.
India should only deal USA with a stick away distance and only professional relationship. U would rather trust Chinese than America .

We have zero reason to buy our defence from America. All those happy people who celebrated on trump becoming president should now slap their faces one by one. I knee this guy can’t be trusted.

Ye jadoo ki jappi and mera bhai modi . Sab bakwas aur jhoot hai. India should keep its views clear.

Don’t ever become an American pawn against Chinese . Everyone was united against USA and some blind countries decided to stay away. Now all those who stayed away realised they had maximum loss.

Only Chinese countered USA and we should have stayed behind and from behind the screen support this endeavour.

He was against deep state so that was the reason for the support. Anyways I am getting is paki nukes are protected by them. Some even saying US owns them and so does saudi own few. US kept them there to hit russia and other enemies . Not sure, but who knows US may even use against us in future or threaten us so that we do not destroy pak.I am more inclined that they own some of the nukes there hence they stopped this.

I guess their plan(may not be trump) was to engage in long war like Russia Ukraine and help pak with money and weapon to prolong to impact our economy. If you see our from start our intension was not to escalate. Probably knew deep state plan and to force both them and their pawn paki to end this we deliberately attacked nuke sites with min damage to send message and force them to end this.

PoK atleast immediately was not in plans. Even if we take military, it's still not going to be easy to keep control as still many will be against us. Do not want our personal to sacrifice in large numbers. Just see how many troops attained veer gati In last 30 yrs. We need to plan this out in such a way that there is considerable public support and we limit to only thinly populated areas of Gilgit balistan tljust to have border with afghanistan.

 

[fire starter]

 

[concard]

Are you sure one cannot spin territorial loss as victory? Doesn't Ukraine does the same thing? Didn't Finland in WW2 also do the same thing, spin territorial loss as victory?

See Pakis are the most shameless and deluded bunch. One cannot find a more shameless person than a Paki. When it will come to territorial loss, their arguments would be "may be we lost some territory, but we killed 10x more soldiers or 10x more aircraft or 10x more ships than we lost against so much bigger country. See that's a victory!" or "someone someone (Bangladeshis in 1971 or Sharif in Kargil) betrayed us, hence we pulled back. Otherwise we were winning!".

There is no narrative victory against a population so much brain washed in his own religious and martial superiority that he is figuratively schizophrenic. Pakis hallucinate and delude themselves. It is like once they reach adulthood, every Paki contracts schizophrenia.

When we are talking about territorial loss we are not talking about some puny few hundred square kilometers. In the case of Porkistan, it must be at the bare minimum PoK becoming Indian territory. Anything more than that I welcome that as a bonus minus the people. In the case of China, it must be at the bare minimum Aksai Chin, but ideally they should lose control of Tibet. People in this day and age are not stupid to believe even after losing huge amount of territory they can be called victorious. It is all about what you had before the war and what you have after the war.