Operation Sindoor and Aftermath

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
He is the CDS, limit me raho .
Humne unko Jo dard diya hai na bete wo unke yaad rahega .
Yes mistakes were made, probably we lost a few assests( very doubtful ), pilots theek hai.
That's it .
36 kya 3600 rafale bhi gir jayen to ghanta farq nai padta .
Aur ek baat, tum plane me cds sahab ko gali dene lage , tum log kehte ho india ko long term me ladna chaiye ?
Kya yaar .
Why give interview to antiindian soros media instead of indian media if you can't speak properly or convey your message properly .
 
Who are the idiots in GOI and military circles that decided this? Confirming jets down out of the blue, not specifying numbers so again ambiguity for the sake of ambiguity, then talk of tactical mistakes and how we learned and rectified. Did he think bloomberg or reuters will publish glorious reviews of his interview? The interviewer got what she wanted, admission of losses. She did her job while our CDS fumbled. They are not interested in what we achieved in Op Sindoor. They were desperate to get our admission of losses as they can now show for forces in poor light. See the headline that bloomberg is running with for the interview.
Hold on.. the exact numbers of IAF jets downed are coming soon.. CDS confirmed jets were downed.. IAF will put out a statement about which were those jets..
 
No need to go on a meltdown. Losses are part of conflicts. Loss of 2-3 jets is nothing in comparison to what we achieved in those few days. My only gripe with this interview is how he presented it that's it. I think IAF will release a report eventually with which assets we lossed and how many PAF jets we might have downed.
 
@everyone..
Are there any remnants of CHINESE AD missiles on Indian territory.. There are of PL-15..
If there are no remnants of Pakistani AD missiles in Indian territory, then it means PL-15 and other A2A missiles hit our aircraft..
 
Why give interview to antiindian soros media instead of indian media if you can't speak properly or convey your message properly .
The answer to that question will remain an enigma forever.
Gentlemen, we have lost the narrative war officially now.
When ever there is a discussion online, everywhere the aerial engagement dominates, world gives naught concern about any other aspect, it's either that or the Trump, nuke war , trade deal part.
Iam not doubting our militaries capability, but we have lost that part of the war .
You never expect special forces to help the enemy narrative, we saw just that .
It's absolute cinema.
 
Last edited:
I'm unable to understand why people here are behaving as if some paki has pickpocketed them in broad daylight! When you attack an enemy that is also a terror state, that too in broad day light, smashing their army's false sense of superiority to the ground within a few hours exposing how shallow and inept they are, there are boud to be losses on our end too!

I can understand poor paki kids and their proposition,they have nothing else to salvage than a few alleged assets downed, rest how pakistan were bombed and their assets destroyed both on ground and air is known to everyone!
 
Well safe to say that we are going to have a difficult time with narrative war going forward.

Any attempt to make our case will only invite more ridicule.

Better not put any effort in this direction, the generals have created this mess and it's better if generals deal with it.
If they really wanted to make a spectate and win narrative war than they had to flatten certain airfield completely or show something more tangible like shot down planes or sunk ships.
 
The CDS should be aware that pakistan did fire a ballistic missile, on Delhi ?
He is still talking about rationale.
Very regretful interview, a complete and utter lack of awareness about narrative .
When you say that nothing was lost, then bloody stick to it ( pardon my usage of strong words) but it's imperative that Military needs their own professional spin doctors.
Looks like he is okay with pahalgam type of attack against india.If such folks are cds then what's the use of increasing army budget we must make india a hindunation and increase more hydrogen bombs and hypersonic weapons for public to use against our enemies of hinduism .I would like bajrang dal to lead indian defence and have all these nuclear weapons.
 
As far as SEAD/DEAD operations are concerned, India will loose the narrative and it will be termed as aggressor. What Government thought and did was perfect. We showed air ingress in Balakot, we showed Standoff capability in OP Sindoor. We have Standoff capability, and we can hit every corner of Pakistani heartland. Next time Loyal wingman and CATS will go and hit all these camps. Our jets can roam well inside above Delhi or Bareilly. If Pakistan takes the bait and tries to do some Swift Retort it will loose Airdefence+Air bases. Justice and Point served.
 
The CDS should be aware that pakistan did fire a ballistic missile, on Delhi ?
He is still talking about rationale.
Very regretful interview, a complete and utter lack of awareness about narrative .
When you say that nothing was lost, then bloody stick to it ( pardon my usage of strong words) but it's imperative that Military needs their own professional spin doctors.
This is simply contradicting the whole GOI sending attache to different countries to show Pakistani's are harbouring terrorists and is a terrorist country.
 
Further proof this man is an idiot in the geo political sense of the word. If Paxtan was so rational why did it provoke hostilities ?

Instead of avoiding loaded questions like this or flipping it around hinting at Paxtani irresponsibility in matters of their N policy highlighting the role the A Q Khan network played in N proliferation , he's ended up drawing an equivalence between India & Paxtan in what will be music to the ears of Fauji Foundation.

Expect them to quote this to all & sundry till the cows come home. What a naive fool !

question must have been about nooclear escalation.

paxtan adopting sub-conventional options(terrorism) against a conventionally superior force under a nuclear overhang, is considered a rational move in strategic(nuclear related) literature. according to this school of thought, under a nuclear overhang, any response other than usage of nukes is considered a rational move.

will have to look into, how far back this theory goes, to check if this theory has been created specifically for paxtan by the goras.

reposting that tweet from yesterday


View: https://x.com/VishalMalvi_/status/1927716409527734397
 
Looks like he is okay with pahalgam type of attack against india.If such folks are cds then what's the use of increasing army budget we must make india a hindunation and increase more hydrogen bombs and hypersonic weapons for public to use against our enemies.
Cds is mostly for ceremony nowadays, good that this man was sent to cds post .
Seems like pran nath thapar type of man , tbh brutally honest.
 
Further proof this man is an idiot in the geo political sense of the word. If Paxtan was so rational why did it provoke hostilities ?

Instead of avoiding loaded questions like this or flipping it around hinting at Paxtani irresponsibility in matters of their N policy highlighting the role the A Q Khan network played in N proliferation , he's ended up drawing an equivalence between India & Paxtan in what will be music to the ears of Fauji Foundation.

Expect them to quote this to all & sundry till the cows come home. What a naive fool !
You are absolutely wrong here.. Give CDS credit..
India expands the space for conventional operations under nuclear overhang by making Pakistan Army come across as a rational player with nukes . Pakistani strategy has been to come across as an irrational nuclear actor, to close the space for conventional operations by India..

Pakistan provoking hostilities using terror has also been part of a very rational strategy of Fauji Foundation where they have not been made to pay the price for such action.. Only Operation Sindoor has extracted "some price from Pakistan" for use of terror, but that too is not much, as the strikes of 2 per base, were only symbolic, and meant to show that we could impose much greater costs..

Remember that 2 nuclear powers have never done to each other, what India did to Pakistan with Operation Sindoor.. This is new territory that no one else in the world has explored before
 
Script is ready.

It was a well laid trap if you go by series of statements by scamgress politicians in recent days.

Now whole narrative will be spinned by scamgress to undermine the operation.

View attachment 37949
Looks like he spoke not like cds but like soros agent to soros media.His family must be investigated along with him.
 
As far as SEAD/DEAD operations are concerned, India will loose the narrative and it will be termed as aggressor. What Government thought and did was perfect. We showed air ingress in Balakot, we showed Standoff capability in OP Sindoor. We have Standoff capability, and we can hit every corner of Pakistani heartland. Next time Loyal wingman and CATS will go and hit all these camps. Our jets can roam well inside above Delhi or Bareilly. If Pakistan takes the bait and tries to do some Swift Retort it will loose Airdefence+Air bases. Justice and Point served.
We conduct sead , we lose narrative
We don't , we lose jets
It's a catch 22, I would rather lose the narrative war, than losing jets ( not a big deal, i know but it is being made as such ).
 
I have to say this way of talking to the press brings down armed forces’ credibility further. We are better off disclosing the numbers now, if we have it. I also don’t understand why we lose aircraft at standoff range. Plus why isn't the IAF chief the one making all these reports? We do a lot of things with bad logic. So if we made mistakes, then we learnt nothing from Balakot? Even peacetime losses of IAF are quite high. The other idiotic thing to say is Indian Navy will lead the war next time. This is going to get mocked at. This would be taken as IAF did not do its job as expected, once again. With the IAF chief talking about Tejas delays, I think our air force is all over the map. And, if we had air domination, questions like why did we not take out PAF air assets is still out there? Now I am thinking that the foreign trips for MPs were a bribe to keep them quiet. If we did lose Rafale, that would have consequences for IAF. Because Modi did say last time that the war would have been different if Rafales were around. Now we are saying if we only had Indian Navy take the lead.
I was just defending IAF with some Amreeki saying they had learnt from past mistakes. They are probably laughing at me right now. Disappointed, very disappointed.
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top