IAF said something like “it is our job to only hit targets and not do BDA” . That was a horrible statement to make. Have you seen any other capable AF around the world that makes such statements? IAF needs to be made more professional and hi-tech and full of fighting spirit. Of course damage assessment is a key requirement of modern air wars. The thing that annoys me is they think they have won brownie points by saying things like that. They do not understand the importance of strategic communications. They are acting like a government office chai-paani department. Indian military needs a professional PR department. Genrols are not good PR people. We saw that with IAF AVM and the CDS. The DGMO was so much better. Identify such people and put them in charge of joint PR for all 3 forces.We didn't even claim we hit specific structures in the air bases and hint at damages of air assets. That's dumb.
Babus don't think about communication and it's impact in the SM era.
Op Sindoor objective must be to establish permanent deterrence to prevent Porki Army and its terrorist battalions from ever striking Indians within India in any capacity. Every infiltration attempt needs to be treated as an act of war. I dont think Modi and the CCS are thinking this way. That is a giant problem.Bkl wapis start karo op sindoor…. And to those who said that objectives were achieved, why Modi said it is operation is still ongoing?
Launchand dismantle all ballistic missiles like Israel is doing.
Fgfa was cancelled because russia as oem didn't want to give any share of work to india nor provide any source code and fgfa was not even stealth or 5th gen due to no izdeliye 30 engine.So will the Ruskies agree?
![]()
India Conditions Su-57E Purchase on Radar Swap, Rattling Russia’s Defence Circles - Defence Security Asia
India’s insistence that Russia must replace key components of the Su-57E stealth fighter—including its radar—with Indian-made systems as a precondition for purchase has reportedly triggered growing concern and dissatisfaction among Moscow’s defence establishment.defencesecurityasia.com
It always was. CIA plan. I had posted earlier too. Plan was to draw Bharat into long war similar to Russia ukraine and impact economyThis confirms a few things, assuming this is true.
1. Pehelgam was planned by the Americans and executed by Pakistanis.
2. Pakistanis were using American nukes to blackmail India, and America was ok with it.
3. India struck the Nur Khan airbase and its underground assets as a retaliation against Pakistan and the US.
4. This also explains why Trump and the US military establishment is annoyed with India.
Lene doh jo bhi Lena hai fir woh J-35 ho ya Patriot. Full training, deployment, unboxing.
Uske baad 4 brahmos fek dono andar.
Moot Diya Tere acquisition par.
Fgfa was cancelled because russia as oem didn't want to give any share of work to india nor provide any source code and fgfa was not even stealth or 5th gen due to no izdeliye 30 engine.
What sort of clownBenefits of not destroying the PAF & PN.
Alhamdulillah!
They will have to strike pre emptively either simultaneously when a terrorist attack is happening in India or immediately after otherwise it's game over for them once Modi publicly declared they'd be targeted.
View: https://x.com/Reuters/status/1936333342309233135?t=VuOSpraRtl9UbgFvzPTtxw&s=19
Remember folks "never ever bring back this treaty,terroristan must pay"
So be it,i remember i used to discuss this on DFI(now discontinued) on the india-pak conflict thread that what PAK used to think is they could kill small number of Indian soldier and civilians on daily basis and negate any Indian response thinking "modi military" will attack,only when say 40 Indian soldiers are killedthen we are going to war.
Which was not the smartest thing to do, strategically. We should have negotiated, haggled and twisted their arm to stay in the programme, instead of throwing a hissy fit and throw our toys out of the pram.Fgfa was cancelled because russia as oem didn't want to give any share of work to india nor provide any source code and fgfa was not even stealth or 5th gen due to no izdeliye 30 engine.
View: https://x.com/Reuters/status/1936333342309233135?t=VuOSpraRtl9UbgFvzPTtxw&s=19
Remember folks "never ever bring back this treaty,terroristan must pay"
I believe the development costs are either 100 billion Euros per party or 100 billion Euros consolidated to be split equally between all member countries.If this news is true, then we have a favorable situation on our hands.
![]()
Airbus says dispute with Dassault is threatening fighter jet project
Company says politicians may need to resolve impasse over governance of Europe’s biggest defence projectwww.ft.com
If Dassault goes solo in their FCAS program, then they will look for more opportunity to export Rafales. 6th generation fighter project will cost lot of money, give or take minimum 30 billion Euros just for research nd development. Dassault will scrape every penny possible through Rafale sales. Whether the recent developments of them exporting fuselage production to TASL and Falcon private jet production to Reliance aerostructures has anything to do with expecting more orders is anyone's guess.
Dassault will definitely look for more orders and likely for joint development of Jet Engines for our 5th generation program. Let us see whether they break with Germans to go solo. Rafale was also born out of the same disagreements. We can't rule out the same happening again.