Operation Sindoor and Aftermath (67 Viewers)

i would rather take 3 jet losses than getting 11 of my main airbases bombarded along with my air defence getting destroyed or supressed. We must understand that the loss of fighter jets has tactical implications while important airbases deep inside a country getting bombarded along with a rumored attack on nuclear installation(s) has strategic implications also the loss of jets was due to our foolishness(not doing sead) rather than their capability.
 
Is there any public acknowledgement( social media, photographs) of the debris of these reputed fallen Indian jets? I heard it said that it would be very hard to hide crashes of aircraft in India, the Indian public would have their cell cameras clicking.
 
Infact so called TRUCK load RCS dodged everything from Balakot to Sindhoor, and jokers stopped production line of it and settled for Rafale and now STILL shilling for Rafale. Atleast restart Su-30 production lines, I don't get argument of Muh extorbitant costs of maintenance when your sanctioned strength is 42 and you have barely only 20 some squadrons.

su-30s seem to have outperformed , dodging AIM and pl-15e and what ever else. some one posted it here before , that su-30mki has better availability than rafale . 70% against 50% for rafale .

but what ever , next thing IAF will be kanging for will be the f35 .
 
su-30s seem to have outperformed , dodging AIM and pl-15e and what ever else. some one posted it here before , that su-30mki has better availability than rafale . 70% against 50% for rafale .

but what ever , next thing IAF will be kanging for will be the f35 .
Is it possible for us to build more su30?
We have ordered 12 more so why not 120.

And maybe lca mk2 on al31 engine with design modifications
 
Porkee had laid an ambush for Indian fighter jets by deploying SAM systems well in advance under the pretext of military exercises.......they moved their AD assets into forward positions months before the terrorist attack........ once those exercises concluded, they did not withdraw those systems as per standard protocol......Instead, they kept their SAM batteries fully active and ready, anticipating an Indian retaliation after orchestrating a cross border provocation......It wasn’t a coincidence......it was a deliberate trap, planned long before the first shot was fired.

Naapaki are trying to orchestrate something similar again........Let’s hope this time we’re proactive, not reactive.
 
Is it possible for us to build more su30?
We have ordered 12 more so why not 120.

And maybe lca mk2 on al31 engine with design modifications

It is, but Govt is scared of CAATSA, Dolund and our new euro-pals getting upset.
As for the users, enough has been said already.

I'm thinking can Pakistan start a war with us to deplete our strength a bit. And then China will launch its assault just after the end of conflict?

Do sem2sem damage to our air defences, air bases and then immediately ring up Doland chacha-jaan for a ceasefire, No Choyna needed.

Whether this will work or no pata nahi.
 
su-30s seem to have outperformed , dodging AIM and pl-15e and what ever else. some one posted it here before , that su-30mki has better availability than rafale . 70% against 50% for rafale .

but what ever , next thing IAF will be kanging for will be the f35 .

Seriously this is true ?
:pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta: :pmegusta:


Here you had dalals telling us that Ruzzian engines have terrible MTBFO as compared to sooperior Western engines === better availability rate.

Kuch nahi hoga is desh ka, as long as it is limited to wrestling with the neighboring swine we are ok but once the Chang gathers his balls and attacks we are fucked.
 

Why are we still in this farce called the quad?

What is even the point of this 'alliance' when we got zero support for Op Sindoor or any punitive action against Terroristan?

We are still trying to lick Americunt arse when they are basically cosying up with Terroristan.

We need to withdraw from thus fucking joke of an alliance, pronto.
 
su-30s seem to have outperformed , dodging AIM and pl-15e and what ever else. some one posted it here before , that su-30mki has better availability than rafale . 70% against 50% for rafale .

but what ever , next thing IAF will be kanging for will be the f35 .
Su 30 outperformed because it is with us for about 3 decades now , generations of our pilots experience have made this platform very potent and lethal.
Even after all those J10, Erie eye on Pak side ,MKI has been able to strike with pin point precison.
For Rafael to get there it has to also go through fire . You can't expect a platform to mature in a system instantaneously
 
Its clear now, hopefully will be laid to rest why India lost aircraft(s). And the government has also learnt. That's why no more "one-hand-tied-behind-back" from next time.
The government must be held accountable for what this restricted RoE achieved for India in Ops Sindoor and the diplomatic reach that followed!

Why should we shit on Indira and Rajiv while giving leaderji the cleanchit?
 

Why are we still in this farce called the quad?

What is even the point of this 'alliance' when we got zero support for Op Sindoor or any punitive action against Terroristan?

We are still trying to lick Americunt arse when they are basically cosying up with Terroristan.

We need to withdraw from thus fucking joke of an alliance, pronto.

Not an alliance saar, helps keep the Chong wary too.
 
The government must be held accountable for what this restricted RoE achieved for India in Ops Sindoor and the diplomatic reach that followed!

Why should we shit on Indira and Rajiv while giving leaderji the cleanchit?
You have to put yourself in their foot and then think. There was no clinching (that no one internationally can dispute) evidence this time like India had during Mumbai 26/11 with call recordings and capture of Kasab.

If you straight up go after military targets then that would have been a literal declaration of war on Pakistan. International diplomatic community would have been even more unfavorable, some may even paint this as a kind of Russian invasion of Ukraine event happening in Asia.

With Pakistan now coming out so overtly as a protectorate of terror and targeting Indian military in response to counter terror targeting, it has now given India the pretext to target Pak military during onset of future operations itself.

India needs to be wary of Chengiz Khan type of Pakistan operation (including covert means).

I am sure Pakistan will give India an opportunity to take military action soon enough.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 41554

And how did this workout for GOI/India? Orange ape (who has rented out his hole to crypto) choose to hyphenate terrorist with victim. Imagine, he wanted Modi to "come over" & have dinner with that terrorist. I wonder how those sections who persuaded Modi for this show their face now. I mean, they are not answerable to the people but Modi is, so it should be okay for them.

View attachment 41555

Yes, ofc, but armed forces types can also be persuading as well, showing the fallout of not doing SEAD etc properly. Unless they have & were over ruled by the political leadership. (which is what would have obviously happened).

There must have been some uncertainty about the "trajectory" of as to how things would unfold had we done an across the board SEAD given the "two front" problem. Hence "we are not seeking escalation"/" we hit only terrorist bases" etc.

But what is strange is this attache speaking like this in public. (people can easily guess that political leadership had put some limitations).

Get this now, Modi is being blamed for "attacking" Pakistan by outsiders & some insiders while he is also being blamed for "not attacking Pakistan enough" by some insiders.

Either way, trying to hurt him politically. This is the prize that he gets for punishing USA's bitch.
No, this is the prize he gets for being a retard. Nothing to do with the USA. Pakistan would always downplay damage on their end, as they have done ever since the last 70 years. Also, any decent opposition will ask these 3 questions:
What have you achieved with your restricted RoE on 7th May?
Why did you suddenly stop after having the upper hand?
Have you degraded Pak forces enough to create a deterrence?
 
It is, but Govt is scared of CAATSA, Dolund and our new euro-pals getting upset.
As for the users, enough has been said already
No it is not the fear of CAATSA because that doesn't apply to already existing JVs or license manufactured products. It's just IAF thinking if HAL produce su-30 MKI the production line for Tejas will get blocked. And then they still have to upgrade those new Su-30 MKI to super Sukhoi. Which will take its sweet time and money. In short they fear about cost overrun. That's it. Murica can't issue CAATSA on Brahmos or Su-30 MKi/Super Sukhoi at all.

At the end its upto IAF whether they want more su-30 MKI or not.
 
You have to put yourself in their foot and then think. There was no clinching (that no one internationally can dispute) evidence this time like India had during Mumbai 26/11 with call recordings and capture of Kasab.

If you straight up go after military targets then that would have been a literal declaration of war on Pakistan. International diplomatic community would have been even more unfavorable, some may even paint this as a kind of Russian invasion of Ukraine event happening in Asia.

With Pakistan now coming out so overtly as a protectorate of terror and targeting Indian military in response to counter terror targeting, it has now given India the pretext to target Pak military during onset of future operations itself.

India needs to be wary of Chengiz Khan type of Pakistan operation (including covert means).

I am sure Pakistan will give India an opportunity to take military action soon enough.
So, hitting non-military targets of a sovereign nation is not a declaration of war, but hitting military targets would be? LOL. Hitting non-military targets has higher consequences in international politics and arbitration!
This is such an absurd logic that even low IQ Pakistanis see through it.
Honestly, the International community takes sides depending upon their benefits and alliances and not on who is the aggressor?
 
"we bombed them so they will only bomb us and not shoot down our jets"

IAF was naive here . hard to believe they didnt consider possibility that pak would retaliate against our jets and that wasnt communicated to leadership.

They DID consider the possibility. Necessary precautions were taken to avoid any retaliation on the strike package, thus none were harmed.

What IAF didn't consider is PAF will later attack any and every jet flying within our own airspace, something akin to a complete war.

These retarded ROEs are the result of some MEA/IFS types persuading the Leaderji.

Same ROEs were in place during Balakot also, same set of official emphasis on "we hit terrorist camps onleee" and "we don't want escalation".

Hopefully because of the blowing up of this bs it should stop during the next round of fighting and IAF can be allowed to do SEAD/DEAD as it should have done always.

This is why you let military leadership make militart decision. Till IPS/IFS lead military branches and operation ours will be an army of lions lead by sheeps.

I'm thinking can Pakistan start a war with us to deplete our strength a bit. And then China will launch its assault just after the end of conflict?

That was always the plan.



Engagement farming.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top