Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini called a high-level meeting after discussions with Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack.

There will be discussions on arrangements for law and order in the state. Chief Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister, Chief Secretary, Home Secretary, Director General of Police, ADGP CID will be part of the meeting: Haryana DPR


View: https://x.com/ANI/status/1915739076533092547?t=pwfHD146lLG9A-0GM0qIWw&s=19
 

View: https://twitter.com/NasirKhuehami/status/1915216781116952683?s=19

7th Incident:


Recieved Distress Calls from Universal Group of Institutions, Derabassi, Chandigarh, where Kashmiri students were brutally attacked inside the hostel premises during the night. Students said that, local individuals and other students forcefully entered the hostel at midnight, targeting Kashmiri students with sharp weapons. Their clothes were torn, and at least one student sustained serious injuries.


Shockingly, the college security remained passive during the entire episode, failing to intervene or protect the students. Even more concerning is the fact that Punjab Police did not provide timely protection or assistance, further emboldening the attackers and leaving students vulnerable and traumatized.


Over 100 Kashmiri students are enrolled in this institution. Request. Punjab Chief Minister @BhagwantMann ji to take immediate and strict action against the perpetrators, fix accountability on negligent security and police officials, and ensure the safety, Security and dignity of all Kashmiri students in Punjab.


@OmarAbdullah @nasirsogami
@kaushikrj6 @zoo_bear @Nidhi @_YogendraYadav @_sayema @sushant_says @sardesairajdeep @SaralPatel @zeeshanBabaS @svaradarajan @anishgawande @priyankac19 @VTankha @AshishSinghLIVE @manojkjhadu @MuzamilJALEEL @alishan_jafri @nasirsogami @betwasharma @samar11 @MahuaMoitra @sajadlone @ShekharGupta @SupriyaShrinate @BDUTT @sardesairajdeep @sagarikaghose @nasirsogami @Partap_Sbajwa @RajaBrar_INC @islahmufti @tehseenp @vijaita
@vidyarthee @khanumarfa @Nidhi
@ahmermkhan @ReallySwara
@sardesairajdeep @svaradarajan
@ravishndtv @alishan_jafri
 
Something is amiss this time. The noise and hula-hoopla is too much. You don't do military operation with so much overt, visible actions.

For example, overt provocative statements, high-intensity meetings, announcement of spectacular air excercises, moving of navy.

Feels like either a diversion or bluff. Hope its not the latter.
When you have lost 26 civilians in a cold blooded terrorist attack, this amount of meetings and statements are normal.major noise is being created by Indian civilians on SM. Modi government has given out proper and necessary statements.
 

Even the DcPP has delivered first antenna array unit to adani as they are the lead integrator

Few years ago 5 were stationed at the base indicating 1 was undergoing changes
Last I heard the 1st aircraft was modified in airbus facility in France
I’m not going to play this game Indian defence fanboys try to do of pretending there’s super secret stashes/projects

These public projects have open stages they have to pass and it will all have to be announced so again when was the contract to convert the airframes done?

I can find a list of the 6 A321 airframes again, which one of these was sent to France (even that doesn’t make sense, the special projects Airbus work like MRTT goes on in Spain)? And when? This can be verified with FR24

Airbus itself is a publicly traded company they would have to publicise such a contract and it would also be a huge deal in the aerospace world (until now Airbus has no rival to the E7)

So again can we please live in reality, this fantasy world is why India keeps getting caught with its pants down by those you’d consider inferior
 
LMAO a nation of spineless subhuman jokers.

Why is this zombie whore even breathing?

This whore is nothing but a breeding womb for future Jihadis. There isn't 1 good thing that'll come from this whore being alive.

I remember you seething about the one OGW who was given enhanced interrogation techniques, his video leaked and then the OGWs family got govt jobs, compensations and the whole village was adopted, while the officer in-charge was ((( investigated )))

So you know why.


Aside from my usual rants, an alternate explanation is this sow and the others pigs and piglets related to the swine are kept under surveillance by the security agencies in case of any ((( movement ))) from her poojahid brozzer
 
1) Ceasefire and Shimla agreement officially are revoked.
2) Nearby areas and villages next to LoC are being emptied
3) Heavy mobilization of equipment and essentials in the last 24 hrs (2 C17s and Israeli support)
4) IWT annuled and impacts are being felt in the water flow
5) INS Vikrant now stationed close to where it should be (for a potential blockage if things go south)
6) Russia and other countries pulling their citizens from Pak (maybe a comms went out to friendlly countries from MEA)
7) Exercise Aakraman in the Central Theater with Rafaels and even good old Bison 21

All the above are tell tale signs that its not going to be another balakot strike and back More likely Special ops....It'll definetely be bigger and possibly PoK capture...The objective here should be pretty simple convert loc to IB . Push enough area to clear all rats in PoK , GB etc to establish a clear IB...Capture and start the fencing process.
Priest King annoucing stuff is English is optics for the world...On ground UD needs to make a foolproof plan submit to HM and finally get greenlighting from DM and Priest King.
More like Sunday evening or Monday evening...Till then relax and enjoy.
 
Something is amiss this time. The noise and hula-hoopla is too much. You don't do military operation with so much overt, visible actions.

For example, overt provocative statements, high-intensity meetings, announcement of spectacular air excercises, moving of navy.

Feels like either a diversion or bluff. Hope its not the latter.

it is neither.
Its called posturing about intent to war.
What this does, is it FORCES your adversary to match combat deployment to the minimum security detterent level they can.
Which is what we want.
Whether we go to war or not, what we DEFINTELY want to do, is to exhuast PakMil strategic fuel reserve. Its far smaller than India's, their ability to source it within home ( as refined product - strategic military reserve isnt crude but refined oil) and pak refining capabilities are a joke.

We did this in 1971 too btw most people dont know - we postured around for six months, forcing pakMil to match us and burn through their strategic oil reserve. THEN we attacked.
This is why Pakistan in 1971 had strategic fuel reserve for 3 week war when they finally went for broke.
 
Something is amiss this time. The noise and hula-hoopla is too much. You don't do military operation with so much overt, visible actions.

For example, overt provocative statements, high-intensity meetings, announcement of spectacular air excercises, moving of navy.

Feels like either a diversion or bluff. Hope its not the latter.

It's a bluff or a stunt to bleed them by keeping them in perpetual readiness mode.

Muneera green-lit this attack expecting a retaliation for which they are prepared, it would be dumb to attack them head on, and with the usual low intensity saargical straikes and balakot bombing.

Knowing our old man it's most likely a sequel to Op. Parakram though, all smoke and no fire.

As I said have no expectations
 
I can't believe how some of us here can be so high to think that full blown war is in India's best interest. It is not. Not in any way. Its the last resort and it has to be escalated and imposed by pakistan on us.

Some of you guys here have ascribed our slow economic growth to terrorism. It is categorically wrong. From 2000-2016 we faced regular terror attacks even in our metro cities still our country continued to grow. It was our economic policies that had put a spanner in our economic growth. It is those policies which lead to the birth of naxalism in India. It is only after liberalization it became feasible and tenable to rid mumbai of its mafia raaj.

Yes, Terrorism takes a toll. Also, we can't let the foe spill the blood of our innocent civilians. Its the duty of the state to protect them and guarantee the security of our Hindu population. Invaders shall not enjoy that protection.

So, a detterent and exemplar action must take place. If need be let us go to full war. But try to do it without full scale war. We have more to loose in a full blown war. We can achieve the same objective differently. Our objective is to solve the problem of terrorism. Its biggest inspiration is pakistan and the idea of pakistan. So, its destruction of pakistan state that is our objective. Not annihilation of green pigs alone. We need to think strategically guys. We need to leverage our strengths and impose a cost on pakistan. To this effect we need to know who will inherit that geography. That new geography should not exist in the form of pakistan. It should exist in the form of Nation State of Sindh, Nation State of Baluchistan, Nation state of punjab, Nation state of Paktunwa. There should be no pakistan state but multitude of states.

How we do that? A full blown war just annihilates the pakistan govt and not state. Pakistan military brass is happy to throw expendable green meat in the grinder. They have enough Airforce and military to inflict heavy casuality on us. By destroying lahore or islamabad we don't hurt them much. Those are usurpers they will loot from their own civilians. Our govt can't. Even destruction of Delhi will cost us a trillion dollar atleast. I am sure they can inflict that cost on us in full scale war. How much cost can we inflict on them. Also we don't even achieve our objective.

So, our only reliable and sure pathway is slow cooking of the pakistan. Let us impose economic blocade on them make them land locked. Now, there supply chains will run from Iran and Afganistan. It helps insurgents baluchs and taliban more. They can entrench themselves more in their regions. Let us seize them and starve them. We should couple it with by locking their military personnel on Indian border. The more we lock them on International border the less they can interfere with insurgents. Our objective is to empower insurgents. We should not let the conflict zone extend more than 30KM from our borders. We should slowly creep forward montly in this war.

A full scale war is more harmful to us and redundant when we can achieve the same objective in much more economical way. We have the leverage and we should put it full use. The objective is to finish the idea of pakistan. If you don't have any idea how to do it. Then please don't do your rona dona here. Full Scale war response is not the correct response.

Its just like Americans fighting in Vietnam. You are not killing the idea of vietnam. You are just favoring a form of govt. Our objective is to kill the idea of pakistan. WE can do so only when the insurgents in pakistan are powerful, just like East pakistan of 1971. India succeeded at that time because East Pakistan had it enough with west pakistan. So, we need to have sindhi's, baluch's, pastun's to have it enough with punjabi dominated pakistan. We can do it when we starve them. Thats why IWT is important. Now we will gain ability to control their water. An informal naval blocade will make them landlocked and their supply chains will run from Iran or Afganistan. It empowers the baluchs and talibanis more. Locking their personnel in a low intensity limited conflict over an extended period of time allows the insurgents to bridge the power gap between pakistan army. This is what we need to do. We need to slow cook them and splinter into pieces. We can do all it while ourselves gaining economic weight and lubricating our industrial complex. Let us choose the best option.

I agree with all of your points. But there is one problem with your argument. We have another enemy who has claim to our territory and undermines us where ever possible. This enemy also supports the enemy which we want to destroy. Now in the near future we have to go up against this bigger enemy. If we have an all out war and if we are weakened, don't you think we will be giving a cake walk to China? How do you defend your argument if China is in the equation?
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top