Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

[Vinash]

Avg whitoid reads about some wars and military history, and thinks he's Napoleon and Julius Caesar in his own mind.

Somebody should ask why amerifags ran away from afg despite being like 50 years ahead in both military and economic terms. War is never easy, even invading a tiny island has its consequences and further ramifications. You can't be a idiot jumping head first into action.

I mean Afg is a bad example. Vietnam is a better example for the point you are trying to make.

In Afg, the Americans dominated completely. If they wanted, they could have stayed and cleaned the entire country. Their goals were different in Afg and they left when they felt it wasn't worth staying.

They weren't pushed out from Afg.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

Yahuds found a great solution to this problem :- relentless aerial assualt.

Yahud doesnt relenetlessly ariel assault Turkey. that is the near-to peer of Israel and its pakistan btw.
Yahud relentlessly air-raids nepal. We can do that too no problems.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

Not interested in word play.

It's undeniable that we are one of the few nations where a country 1/6th our size dares to pick on again and again over decades.

Show me another big country that'll tolerate a small country the way India tolerates Pakistan.

Our previous generations were risk averse paper pushers with little to no masculinity. Things are changing slowly.

*vietnam has entered the chat, sitting right on china's arm-rest and is looking at you*.

 

[Knowitall]

IWT to in its current form is just some world play. There is little to no infrastructure on the western rivers and in a democracy 5-10 years down the line BJP being present or not is always a question though i will always hope for their success.

This is pretty much an eye wash nothing more nothing less.

 

[Vinash]

*vietnam has entered the chat, sitting right on china's arm-rest and is looking at you*.

Not even close.

Does Vietnam send terrorists into China on a daily basis for decades?

Did Vietnam start 4 wars with China?

 

[Prasad]

I mean Afg is a bad example. Vietnam is a better example for the point you are trying to make.

In Afg, the Americans dominated completely. If they wanted, they could have stayed and cleaned the entire country. Their goals were different in Afg and they left when they felt it wasn't worth staying.

They weren't pushed out from Afg.

Vietnam is even worse for US.

The only major win for US post WW2 is the Gulf war in 1990, all others were failures. Some of them colossal.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

Not even close.

Does Vietnam send terrorists into China on a daily basis for decades?

Did Vietnam start 4 wars with China?

Fair, i meant in terms of 'tiny guy sitting next to big guy who is a continuous kebab-mein-haddi' to big guy. But yes, vietnam doesnt start shit with China, its always the 'fuck u, i am galey-me-haddi, now u die' chap in the world.

 

[crazywithmath]

Not interested in word play.

The Tweet you quoted claimed that India and pak do not go to war because apparently, they cannot 'fight'. There is no word play here.

It's undeniable that we are one of the few nations where a country 1/6th our size dares to pick on again and again over decades.

Show me another big country that'll tolerate a small country the way India tolerates Pakistan.

Show me another instance of two nuclear capable nations heading to war - apart from Kargil 1999. Why were the burgerboys fighting bhukha nanga Russia through proxy wars in Ukraine?

Our previous generations were risk averse paper pushers with little to no masculinity. Things are changing slowly.

Irrelevant in this context.

 

[Vinash]

Vietnam is even worse for US.

The only major win for US post WW2 is the Gulf war in 1990, all others were failures. Some of them colossal.

No question about Vietnam it was a disaster.

But in other wars, they rarely lose soldiers and occupy the host nation with very less casualties.

 

[Vinash]

The Tweet you quoted claimed that India and pak do not go to war because apparently, they cannot 'fight'. There is no word play here.



Show me another instance of two nuclear capable nations heading to war - apart from Kargil 1999. Why were the burgerboys fighting bhukha nanga Russia through proxy wars in Ukraine?



Irrelevant in this context.

It's a sarcastic take on the situation. Not a PhD thesis.

He's broadly right that Pakistan does terrorism because they can't wage a war against India and that India has the capability to destroy Pakistan but is too chicken shit to do it.

I agree with that take completely. You are free to feel different.

 

[Prasad]

No question about Vietnam it was a disaster.

But in other wars, they rarely lose soldiers and occupy the host nation with very less casualties.

in terms of casualties, yes.
in terms of results, no.

US has learnt very quickly from Vietnam that bombing a country is a million times easier than occupying one.
even in recent Iraq and Afg, they never really held the country, reason why these 2 countries quickly went back to US hating ones.

India is not in a position to easily win a war where we are occupying Paki land.
The only way to achieve this is if we are ready for hundreds of thousands of our soldiers being killed.

 

[Knowitall]

9-15 years in Indian terms basically means never. Too many elections too many variables and the fact that the treaty is not scrapped but only suspended. Typical eyewash.


View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1915106961583935979?s=46

 

[Vinash]

in terms of casualties, yes.
in terms of results, no.

US has learnt very quickly from Vietnam that bombing a country is a million times easier than occupying one.
even in recent Iraq and Afg, they never really held the country, reason why these 2 countries quickly went back to US hating ones.

India is not in a position to easily win a war where we are occupying Paki land.
The only way to achieve this is if we are ready for hundreds of thousands of our soldiers being killed.

Depends on what you mean by results.

I frankly believe the American defense corporations want to extract as much $$$$ as possible from tax payers and hence deliberately extend their campaigns.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

No question about Vietnam it was a disaster.

But in other wars, they rarely lose soldiers and occupy the host nation with very less casualties.

vietnam disaster was compounded by NATO equipment failure IN vietnam.
I know plenty of vietnam vets- they ALL said the same thing - first thing u do when u get out in fied, is somehow kill a gook and take his rifle. or take risk of getting on the wrong side of some higher up if he ever sees you by taking illegal shotgun.
Why ? coz NATO rounds do not have punching power through thick foliage. AK-47 rounds do. so does a shotgun slug.
Vietnam is jungle terrain. its not open fields of europe or wooded treelands of europe to fight over.

Yankee machinery at the time was COMPLETELY LOATHE to admit that they were outgunned on the field at infantry level. Their solution was 'no problem, increase number of machine gunner per company to triple'. Well not everyone CAN be a machine gunner and its a good reason why there is only one per company and he looks like Hulk Hogan - coz you need to be Hulk Hogan to keep up running with your unit lugging a gun that weighs 15 kilos and 3 times more than every other guy's gun.
So in reality, the GI-joes just went 'sir yes sir, machine gunner sir' and then went around and scored an AK or a shotgun anyways.
And AK ammo is easy to come by in vietnam coz Vietcong made shit load of ammo catches thinking many will get busted and many did.

NATO rounds usually are smaller, but have higher muzzle velocities and greater range accuracies. Rus rounds usually are bigger, less muzzle velocity and lower range accuracies but only after 500m, which means only in very rare scenarios as you usually dont shoot your ARs at half a km distance very often. But Rus rounds can punch through close range obstacles a LOT easier - this is why TAVOR uses Rus round calibre at most missions, since shooting through glass, drywall, wood etc. is requirement for door to door urban warfare and CT missions.

 

[crazywithmath]

It's a sarcastic take on the situation. Not a PhD thesis.

You quoted a trailer trash MAGAtard, they genuinely believe this shit. There is no sarcasm involved. Quoted chud likely does not even know that India and pakiland fought 4 wars between themselves.

He's broadly right that Pakistan does terrorism because they can't wage a war against India and that India has the capability to destroy Pakistan but is too chicken shit to do it.

Because modern warfare has been effectively replaced by proxy wars after nukes went 'mainstream'. It is not a cope to call it out as such.

Like I said, supapowa MURICA will not dare to go after those buukha nanga Russkies.

I agree with that take completely. You are free to feel different.

Sure.

 

[Varoon4]

It's a sarcastic take on the situation. Not a PhD thesis.

He's broadly right that Pakistan does terrorism because they can't wage a war against India and that India has the capability to destroy Pakistan but is too chicken shit to do it.

I agree with that take completely. You are free to feel different.

India also has the fear of that mentality that is necessary to destroy a country. It is considered going over to the dark side of human nature. The fear is totally understandable. And yes, there is also the " What will the world think of us" fear. Which is related to the first one.

 

[Vinash]

You quoted a trailer trash MAGAtard, they believe this shit genuinely. There is no sarcasm involved. Quoted chud likely does not even know that India and pakiland fought 4 wars between themselves.



Because modern warfare has been effectively replaced by proxy wars after nukes went 'mainstream'. It is not a cope to call it out as such.

Like I said, supapowa MURICA will not dare to go after those buukha nanga Russkies.



Sure.

He himself stated that India won all wars against Pakistan.

Not my problem if you are nitpicking that article. I was very taken by that part where he said "India almost loses patience after every terror attack but never actually does" and the shit show goes on for eternity.

 

[crazywithmath]

He himself stated that India won all wars against Pakistan.

Not my problem if you are nitpicking that article. I was very taken by that part where he said "India almost loses patience after every terror attack but never actually does" and the shit show goes on for eternity.

Eh? I am referring to the xitter handle exclusively.

 

[rock127]

Now seems like we might have to open a thread on Idiotic Musing from RADICAL SHIA Iran.

This big IRANI IDIOT who has ZERO knowledge of the local issues is promoted as International Mod.

This SHIA conveniently missed how his own SHIA muslims are beaten black and blue and simply BUTCHERED like PIGS by Sunni Punjabi Muslims specially in PoK itself. Every now and then PoK erupts in protests and violence against SUNNI PAK Army and ask for independence and merger with India.

Not to mention MASSIVE rallies by Paki SUNNIS who want to totally butcher all SHIAS and other Muslims from SUNNI Pakistan.

I hope this mental reads this post. What a LOW IQ DIMWIT is this Shia IRANI! Sister breeding causes such low IQ creature.

Would really thank US/Israel or anyone who can do a REGIME CHANGE or topple their MENTAL MULLA REGIME. Iran is indeed a MASSIVE pain in the ass for the WHOLE world for a very long time now. Even Saudis and other progressive SUNNI countries are irritated by Irani Mulla regime.

 

[Vinash]

Eh? I am referring to the xitter handle exclusively.

Ah I could give a rats ass about the handle I quoted.

I only care about the 4 screenshots of the article posted by that handle. I could have uploaded just the pics but I wanted to give credit to the handle where I came across that article.