Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

[Sanglamorre]

I researched so much on this, no one has ever quantified the losses, except that it will somehow lower our prestige on the global level.

Well fck you with your virtue signalling

That's not quite the point. It's a river. Even if you cancel IWT and start building dams from this very hour, you'll need decades for it to take effect.

 

[Cheepek]

That's not quite the point. It's a river. Even if you cancel IWT and start building dams from this very hour, you'll need decades for it to take effect.

We can start with unilaterally suspending the IWT, what future holds will be decided in the future

 

[Satish Sharma Ji]

View: https://x.com/VishnuNDTV/status/1914989042107604992

This is peak of retardness there are way where pak retaliation wont do much to us. Why to engage in domain where they are stronger better give go ahead for navy.
Firing missile at them means they could be doing the same on us. Last time they said for every one missile you fire we would launch 3. They have nothing to loose. We should retaliate such that it ends favouring us.
And I'm sure after balakot higher ups would have analysed what are our weaknesses and strengths in order to retaliate again if needed.
Navy needs to be given a free hand

As I always say for india economic growth is priority.
I see overall larger picture with china getting taxed to 250% many will be moving out to india. It's in no interest of china to see a stronger india and this is a golden opportunity to grasp.
The only reason as sjha said pak-chinkoms initiated this is to get india into a larger war and sabotage the overall growth chapter which could have started. They want us to get into war very badly that's there priority does that mean we shouldn't retaliate NO
We should but not such a way that it would instigate a larger war if they do instigate they we should go full blown onto them.

The most survivable way through this mess is a naval retaliatory strike on there ships which means we won't be targeting pakistani land sar zameen.
Sink multiple ships the parity between Indian Navy & pak navy is huge. And iaf can provide umbrella agains paf.
Strike there ships sink them. After which put a naval blockade and starve them & there economy.
Every here is taking abt retaliation no one's has idea abt end game how will this end ? We should try making it in our favour. For that it's must we don't incur losses be it of life, economic, infra etc etc.

If they retaliate ln full blown manner (multi domain)via missile on our land hit there critical infra destroy shipyards destroy those subs under construction destroy all ports except the gwadar. As I said earlier then we should go full blown as well after all they getting into position for full fledged war we cant keep the peace to preserve prosperity.

But at the end pakistan would have suffered much more and we would have also lost some years of development and prosperity.
Pakistan has nothing to loose if they loose 100x more still what damage our economic growth will face would be enormous and that's what china wants. The opportunities would have already flown to other countries by then.

We should retaliate not into paki land but straight away take out there ships we overpower them there.

Or the another much peacefull option would be begging with naval blockade without initiating any attack on pns and once they initiate we should too with keeping it limited to navy only. Preferably only ship should be target but as I said once they cross the line we should engage too. Beginning with naval infra ports and much stronger blockade for years to come.
This way we can ensure least damage to us.
Unless and until we don't face war at borders it should be fine.

They want escalation that's clear

No naval operation/blockade is much better choice if done peaceful preferably without launching missiles starving them would the best for us as we wouldn't suffer much losses. If any misadventures done by them we should start taking down there ships.

Naval Blockade(if misadventures done)>sink pak ships(another misadventures done into our land)>take one ports>if they dont stop Go engage in multi domain (paf,pa) then go full blown.
@mist_consecutive what is you're take on this you're the only one who talked abt the end game of this matter. We should do our best to bring end in our favour it's not worth it even if we do 100x more damage compared to us. We shall keep this conflict away from borders. Unless untill they chooses not to

Completely agreed retaliation should only come from naval side with preferably naval blockade. Along with fighter support to them from iaf side.

 

[THESIS THORON]

I don’t see what we gained from agreeing to a ceasefire with them it was a bad deal. They’re still attempting infiltrations whenever they want. Meanwhile, the ceasefire gave them time to resupply. If we were whooping their asses, they wouldn’t have had that chance, and their forces would be taking hits from both the Baloch side and our front.

 

[shade2]

It means LeT. Not Pak army leadership. Rajnath is too cuck for that.

I have posted in the other CI/CT thread regarding this, attacking Muneera or his uniformed jamaat or their businesses or their families is dangerous, which would lead to them attacking our uniforms( generols ) and dhotis also.

So some 2rs jihadi small fries will be smoked thats all, not the root that is GHQ Pindi and its termites

 

[haldilal]

View: https://x.com/prachyam7/status/1914946145287331981

 

[Sanglamorre]

We can start with unilaterally suspending the IWT, what future holds will be decided in the future

Yes, but it won't address the now and short term. IWT should absolutely be scrapped but unfortunately for now, it'll be as useful as banning Chinese apps. Also any successive Pak pasinda govt can reverse it while the dams are being made

 

[BabaKhalbali]

View: https://x.com/sjlazars/status/1914990849785778321?s=46

Mostly HCI officials

 

[Patriots]

Porki AWACS airborne... i hope iaf is cooking something View attachment 31425

Let meteor to prove its long range capability

 

[samsaptaka]

You expect Modi to kick things off when he told Putin "this is not an era of war, but one of dialogue and diplomacy?"

More likely VlaPu mocking maulanas 'era of war has ended' statement.

On a different more positive note, one curious thing is that Kashmiri Muslim women have the lowest fertility rate of all South Asian Muslim women. Very

You forget that all sullah women are captured & converted slaves , ergo all trashmiri sulla women are descendents of captured hindu women. Same goes for most trashmiri sullah men too.
Though it doesn't matter now, they as trash as all sullahs so need to be exterminated

 

[BabaKhalbali]

View: https://x.com/adityarajkaul/status/1914990950138646720?s=46

 

[Cheepek]

Yes, but it won't address the now and short term. IWT should absolutely be scrapped but unfortunately for now, it'll be as useful as banning Chinese apps. Also any successive Pak pasinda govt can reverse it while the dams are being made

Arre bro short term long term is immaterial. I am saying there are no cons of scrapping the IWT. It may have no benefit as well for now. But it is a special arrangement borne out of goodwill that should be scrapped.

 

[johny_baba]

I'm a simple hindu, i believe that true ghar waapsi is only possible when they take birth as hindus

so you want to do ghar waapsi?
fine, just give them that kind of mrityu that disqualifies jannat to them

and let cycles of rebirth take care of the rest

i posted this just last thursday, and seems relevant for centuries lasting peace here

 

[haldilal]

View: https://x.com/i/status/1914797661397639535

 

[shade2]

More likely VlaPu mocking maulanas 'era of war has ended' statement.

It is the nature and requirement of their trade that politicians say one thing and do the other
but when our iya raja says "Buddh not Yuddh" and "This is not the era of war" he truly means it.

 

[crazywithmath]

More likely VlaPu mocking maulanas 'era of war has ended' statement.

Like I wrote the other day, VlaPu does not care. His govt is engaging in some anti terrorism jhumla with pakis (ref to recent SM post of porki foreign ministry) as we speak - when VlaPu does not care why should Ji? He should double down on playing both sides.

 

[BabaKhalbali]

View: https://x.com/pti_news/status/1914997690066440362?s=46

 

[shade2]

View: https://x.com/sjlazars/status/1914990849785778321?s=46

Mostly HCI officials

HCI meaning the Indian embassy there?
i.e ambassador high comissioner withdrawn?

 

[crazywithmath]

HCI meaning the Indian embassy there?
i.e ambassador high comissioner withdrawn?

Does not need to be the ambassador. Might be some other embassy official(s).

 

[FalconSlayers]

Pics out