- Joined
- Jul 4, 2024
- Messages
- 2,207
- Likes
- 10,526
@Magadha Nareshtried it, won't work. some people abuse no matter how much information is provided.
Its not about ego. Wars should not be thought on the basis of ego or pride. Does it even matter if they acknowledge the casuality or not? It doesn't. We inflict the casuality. They will have to replace that guy with someone from uniform again. How many can they replace if we continue this slow simmer for say 3 or 4 years. We have the material and human advantage. We don't loose much if we can limit the engagement in some 20-30KM zone. But they do. So a low intensity but a prolonged conflict is in our interest. A short but intense conflict will surely cause some good harm but still we will come over top on pakistan. I prefer long term but low intensity conflict where we slowly tighten the noose our pakistan military establishment.I used to think that way too but what will it achieve. We had it post balakot. We will 10 of theirs they deny and then after few days will say 1 died. We will have our soldiers too who will die. So why should they die just for some ego without any concrete gain. If we can take strategic posts or target major military installations including some brigadier once it's will send msg sure they will do retaliation and we will again do it will go for some days.
Actually, there was some unwritten code, among even the terrorists, that you don't attack popular tourist sites like Pahalgam and Gulmarg. Largely no doubt because it brought in revenue to the Kashmiris, some of whom would have used those gains for separatist/terrorist activity.Al jazeera -
View attachment 31458
we can't even ban these guys from media and people think we are capable of responding harshly.
We have few in construction and one just finished construction over Ravi river.
@Magadha Naresh
Why don't you take the initiative ? As a civil services aspirant you must be farely well acquainted with these matters as these form part of your curricula . We can chip in with guidance & advice if needed.
Technically everything in the constitution is reversible. Because constitution is cast in paper not in stone. As far as someone else coming to power goes, it's upto the intellect of the citizens then, not too elect such people in power ever in futureSo...
Ban Chinese apps 2.0
All of these can be reversed the term someone else comes into power.
Scrap IWT, keep IWT, Pakistan will still get the same water for decades.
Most non-retaliation ever.
Fighting to farming: Pakistan military’s relentless quest for relevance
https://www.orfonline.org/expert-sp...tan-military-s-relentless-quest-for-relevance
Pakistan Army hands 45,000 acres for 'corporate agriculture farming'
That's why women are kept out of decision making.
View: https://x.com/Ravi3pathi/status/1915039829764587778?t=XalMp52bv3TOl3edWLj4og&s=19
I dont see this happening. They would be walking right into a well prepared and fortified adversary.
View attachment 31471
Post in thread 'Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack' https://defenceforumbharat.com/threads/pahalgam-islamic-terror-attack.847/post-113836 sameI dont see this happening. They would be walking right into a well prepared and fortified adversary.
View attachment 31471
Read along with the MEA communique this is a very important observation. It could also be that this is the extent of our response , something I don't endorse . Once again early days yet as GoI may still decide on kinetic retaliation , but by keeping the IWT in abeyance , GoI has put the ball in Paxtan's or more precisely in Fauji Foundation's court.