@Magadha Naresh
Its not about ego. Wars should not be thought on the basis of ego or pride. Does it even matter if they acknowledge the casuality or not? It doesn't. We inflict the casuality. They will have to replace that guy with someone from uniform again. How many can they replace if we continue this slow simmer for say 3 or 4 years. We have the material and human advantage. We don't loose much if we can limit the engagement in some 20-30KM zone. But they do. So a low intensity but a prolonged conflict is in our interest. A short but intense conflict will surely cause some good harm but still we will come over top on pakistan. I prefer long term but low intensity conflict where we slowly tighten the noose our pakistan military establishment.
Actually, there was some unwritten code, among even the terrorists, that you don't attack popular tourist sites like Pahalgam and Gulmarg. Largely no doubt because it brought in revenue to the Kashmiris, some of whom would have used those gains for separatist/terrorist activity.
Technically everything in the constitution is reversible. Because constitution is cast in paper not in stone. As far as someone else coming to power goes, it's upto the intellect of the citizens then, not too elect such people in power ever in future
Post in thread 'Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack' https://defenceforumbharat.com/threads/pahalgam-islamic-terror-attack.847/post-113836 same
Read along with the MEA communique this is a very important observation. It could also be that this is the extent of our response , something I don't endorse . Once again early days yet as GoI may still decide on kinetic retaliation , but by keeping the IWT in abeyance , GoI has put the ball in Paxtan's or more precisely in Fauji Foundation's court.
to deal with this
