Russian Ukrainian War

[Corvus Splendens]

Recruitment going well I see

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/1gruxh6/ua_pov_unable_to_catch_a_rather_fleetfooted_lad/

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/1gr6i0q/ua_pov_in_kyiv_locals_blocked_the_entrance_to_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/1gree5j/ru_pov_a_video_about_the_possible_ways_of_service/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

 

[Akim]

Who says you are "creating" nuclear weapons. They will be given to you just like all the other weapons you have.

Only 3/5. 2/5 of the necessary weapons we produce ourselves.

You will never get it. It all about perception, not what's official. It's all over the place on the internet, and while I understand part of your point, I'm afraid once again it's irrelevant. My personal opinion is he knows he won't ever use a nuke, but why not threaten the west? What does he have to lose at this point, because it's really gotten so bad for Ukraine there is no hope left except desperation. So nobody is taking him seriously anyway, I think most western leaders thinks Zelensky is clown and a fool. BTW here just one more hole to try and plug up on the front line, good luck.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mpN_dyhJS8

Indeed, only hints about nuclear weapons change the accent of the conversation. That is why Putler constantly waves a nuclear club and threatens the USA.
If they create nuclear weapons, then only for future threats. This is identical to NATO too. No one calls for the French or British regular armies to fight next to us.
You know that I do not watch your videos, so these fantasies are not interesting to me. To dislodge Ukrainian troops from the Kursk region, North Korean troops are involved, the Koksans are traveling across Russia and suddenly magically find a new group for the offensive.

 

[Akim]

The National Guard of Ukraine received the first batch of DITA SPG.
9 months! This is still good by European standards. For example, the French CAESAR needs to wait 15 months. We produce more self-propelled howitzers per month than all of Europe produces in half year. With drone and missile strikes.
Europe has really relaxed. Britain will only resume production of the M777 in the middle of next year.
We have no time to wait. Now going military tests of the towed BOGDANA-BK, with a barrel length of 39 calibers.
Of course, CAESAR and DITA are better than the BOGDANA SPG, but it is better to have 15 imperfect howitzers than one perfect one.

 

[shade2]

Who has seen even one official statement that we are creating nuclear weapons? Only speculations of journalists. Today there are only two guarantees of security - a powerful ally or nuclear weapons. If the US stops supplying us, who will guarantee that "tomorrow" they will not leave Taiwan or South Korea too?

That Times article you screenshotted says they have seen the document

I believe it do exist, must be Zelesnsky asked officially to whatever defense/tech bureaucrats are there that do y'all have the capability to produce nukes on immediate basis
The bureaucrats prepared a report saying yes, so and so ways how we can produce a dirty bomb.

Then this document was leaked to The Times on purpose

South Africa literally build like 7 nukes to be launched out of some fuck hueg artillery gun, but these were only to protect the Apartheid regime from a zerg rush of Mugabe/Zimbabwe and Anglolan/Cuban armies via threats of "we'll nuke you all"

So your govt's scheme seems similar, use Nukes as excuse to get some diplomatic gains, ofc not with Russia but with EU and American sponsors, whether it is men in the form of mercs or additional weapons and ammo supplies idk, you may know more from local media

Who says you are "creating" nuclear weapons. They will be given to you just like all the other weapons you have.

No, too much risk for their sponsors of the Russians escalating, nothing will be "given" to Ukranians

 

[Akim]

That Times article you screenshotted says they have seen the document

I believe it do exist, must be Zelesnsky asked officially to whatever defense/tech bureaucrats are there that do y'all have the capability to produce nukes on immediate basis
The bureaucrats prepared a report saying yes, so and so ways how we can produce a dirty bomb.

Then this document was leaked to The Times on purpose

South Africa literally build like 7 nukes to be launched out of some fuck hueg artillery gun, but these were only to protect the Apartheid regime from a zerg rush of Mugabe/Zimbabwe and Anglolan/Cuban armies via threats of "we'll nuke you all"

So your govt's scheme seems similar, use Nukes as excuse to get some diplomatic gains, ofc not with Russia but with EU and American sponsors, whether it is men in the form of mercs or additional weapons and ammo supplies idk, you may know more from local media

That article talks about plutonium bombs, but I don't subscribe to the Times, so I couldn't take a full screenshot. However, I know the content.
They did talk to an expert who confirmed that Ukraine could create such a weapon.
As for the document, I doubt that they could see a document marked "Top Secret". But there is an official answer from our Foreign Ministry that there are no plans to develop atomic weapons. So this news falls into the category of "combat geese from biolabs".

View: https://x.com/KermlinRussia/status/1822935037806833812

 

[haldilal]

 

[shade2]

View attachment 15511

I can almost hear the Genrols screeching EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT NEEDED SAAAAAR!!!!

 

[WW2historian]

Only 3/5. 2/5 of the necessary weapons we produce ourselves.

Indeed, only hints about nuclear weapons change the accent of the conversation. That is why Putler constantly waves a nuclear club and threatens the USA.
If they create nuclear weapons, then only for future threats. This is identical to NATO too. No one calls for the French or British regular armies to fight next to us.
You know that I do not watch your videos, so these fantasies are not interesting to me. To dislodge Ukrainian troops from the Kursk region, North Korean troops are involved, the Koksans are traveling across Russia and suddenly magically find a new group for the offensive.

"so these fantasies are not interesting to me" Akim if you would say the complete opposite of what you think, you would be correct 100% of the time. The ISW confirmed everything the MSC said, so how do you explain why a pro Ukrainian think tank would be saying the same thing that a pro Russian would say? (BTW he's a neutral observer, but you think he's pro Russian) https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-november-15-2024

 

[WW2historian]

This picture from the US think tank shows just how bad Ukrainian is doing in the Kursk area.

 

[WW2historian]

This picture from the US think tank shows just how bad Ukrainian is doing in the Kursk area. Look at how much Russia has gained back from Ukraine's furthest advances.
View attachment 15514

 

[Corvus Splendens]

View attachment 15511

According to NAFO fellas, the dudes operating these MLRS are supermen and have all survived this strike.

 

[WW2historian]

View attachment 15503
The National Guard of Ukraine received the first batch of DITA SPG.
9 months! This is still good by European standards. For example, the French CAESAR needs to wait 15 months. We produce more self-propelled howitzers per month than all of Europe produces in half year. With drone and missile strikes.
Europe has really relaxed. Britain will only resume production of the M777 in the middle of next year.
We have no time to wait. Now going military tests of the towed BOGDANA-BK, with a barrel length of 39 calibers.
Of course, CAESAR and DITA are better than the BOGDANA SPG, but it is better to have 15 imperfect howitzers than one perfect one.

Don't those fire 152mm shells? I heard from many sources that Ukraine and the west supply of those shells are almost out. I guess they can replace the gun with a 155mm gun, but that will take time and money.
I also hear that Ukraine is running out of men, so maybe old ladies can be used.

 

[Akim]

"so these fantasies are not interesting to me" Akim if you would say the complete opposite of what you think, you would be correct 100% of the time. The ISW confirmed everything the MSC said, so how do you explain why a pro Ukrainian think tank would be saying the same thing that a pro Russian would say? (BTW he's a neutral observer, but you think he's pro Russian) https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-november-15-2024

haven't seen your video, so I can't compare. I only read the title. Planting a Russian flag with a sabotage group is not a sign of an invasion. The point is that Russia doesn't have extra troops. They're all here. So I don't think an invasion from the Bryansk region or from Belarus is likely.
You're just reading the information, I live in the epicenter of events, so I have more details.
You have an example - the recent American elections. I read articles, looked at statistics, listened to different analysts. But I don't live inside American society, so you knew its background better. So don't try to convince me with the phrase "everything is lost."

 

[WW2historian]

haven't seen your video, so I can't compare. I only read the title. Planting a Russian flag with a sabotage group is not a sign of an invasion. The point is that Russia doesn't have extra troops. They're all here. So I don't think an invasion from the Bryansk region or from Belarus is likely.
You're just reading the information, I live in the epicenter of events, so I have more details.
You have an example - the recent American elections. I read articles, looked at statistics, listened to different analysts. But I don't live inside American society, so you knew its background better. So don't try to convince me with the phrase "everything is lost."

You do know that Russia has at least 5 times the population as Ukraine. Russia doesn't have man shortages, Ukraine does. If you want to conclude the opposite because there are N. Korean soldier in Russia, then do so, but remember my advice? Think the exact opposite, an you will be 100% correct. It might be a diversion or it might be the real thing. The point is will Ukraine redeploy troops to this area just in case? My thinking is yes. Zelensky is really anal about losing land. I'm not saying that because he's a Jew. But have you every heard the joke, how did invention of the copper wire happen? Two Jews fighting over a penny.

 

[hurrians]

"I, as the president of Ukraine, will only take seriously a conversation with the president of the United States of America, with all due respect to any entourage, to any people."

"From our side, we must do everything so that this war ends next year, ends through diplomatic means," Zelenskiy said.

Zelenskiy says Ukraine must try to ensure war ends next year through diplomacy

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy acknowledged the challenging situation in eastern Ukraine, stating that Russia is currently making advances. Despite this, Zelenskiy emphasized the importance of ending the war through diplomatic means next year. He also mentioned that U.S.

m.economictimes.com

 

[shade2]

"I, as the president of Ukraine, will only take seriously a conversation with the president of the United States of America, with all due respect to any entourage, to any people."

"From our side, we must do everything so that this war ends next year, ends through diplomatic means," Zelenskiy said.

Zelenskiy says Ukraine must try to ensure war ends next year through diplomacy

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy acknowledged the challenging situation in eastern Ukraine, stating that Russia is currently making advances. Despite this, Zelenskiy emphasized the importance of ending the war through diplomatic means next year. He also mentioned that U.S.

m.economictimes.com

inb4 he gets coup'd
inb4 he escapes to Jew York/Washington/London
inb4 the coupster is demonized so that pulling the plug is ez

The coupster will probably be the one four star general they keep talking about, Valery something

As i've said before this man is a puppet with very specific objectives, i would be sure just yesterday he would insist on 1991 borders, now it's "diplomatic solution" next he will agree to let Russia keep the land

 

[WW2historian]

"I, as the president of Ukraine, will only take seriously a conversation with the president of the United States of America, with all due respect to any entourage, to any people."

"From our side, we must do everything so that this war ends next year, ends through diplomatic means," Zelenskiy said.

Zelenskiy says Ukraine must try to ensure war ends next year through diplomacy

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy acknowledged the challenging situation in eastern Ukraine, stating that Russia is currently making advances. Despite this, Zelenskiy emphasized the importance of ending the war through diplomatic means next year. He also mentioned that U.S.

m.economictimes.com

He admits he won't talk to Putin, but also accuses him of being not interested in a peace deal? IMO he's correct about Putin not being interested in a peace deal, because of what he also said in that article, "Zelenskiy conceded that the battlefield situation in eastern Ukraine was difficult and Russia was making advances." So why would Putin want peace when he get achieve everything he wants by force? Beggars can't be choosers. Zelensky has said Russia must leave all of Ukraine including Crimea, and then and only then will he talk about peace with Putin. He actually said more including Russia must pay for all the destruction caused, and Putin has to turn himself over to the Hague.

Putin will face an international war crimes court, Zelenskyy says

Ukraine's president spoke a day after he denied his forces were responsible for what the Kremlin called an attempt to assassinate Putin in a drone attack on Moscow.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[shade2]

He admits he won't talk to Putin, but also accuses him of being not interested in a peace deal? IMO he's correct about Putin no being interested in a peace deal, because of what he also said in that article, "Zelenskiy conceded that the battlefield situation in eastern Ukraine was difficult and Russia was making advances." So why would Putin want peace when he get achieve everything he wants by force? Beggars can't be choosers. Zelensky has said Russia must leave all of Ukraine including Crimea, and then and only then will he talk about peace with Putin. He actually said more including Russia must pay for all the destruction caused, and Putin has to turn himself over to the Hague.

Putin will face an international war crimes court, Zelenskyy says

Ukraine's president spoke a day after he denied his forces were responsible for what the Kremlin called an attempt to assassinate Putin in a drone attack on Moscow.

www.nbcnews.com

Arre
this all sounds like his usual, like the Hamas conditions for cheese-fire with Israel