Operation Sindoor and Aftermath

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
China has one thing to offer and we do ally with China on this - climate cooperation, where the west tries to fuck over our industries with carbon tax BS and emissions crap. yes, its a marriage of convinience for now and as soon as china starts to transition to high income economy ( if it does), it will flip and go anti-climate for us, but for now, this is what China has to offer us. What China offers us, is more valuable by virtue of its existence - USA knows, it cant antagonise us TOO much, else we may be pushed into China's arms and certain US moves- like trying to get a base in Myanmar or Bangladesh- indo-chinese backyard- may just see some off the books cooperation between India and China-so China's main value to us, is to be a power-check on USA for us.

This is true, i forgot about this.

Climate change has lost a lot of it's momentum. No alternative energy source save for nuclear is dependable throughout the year. Also, only the dumb Democratic party pushes for it.

Our differences with Chini are the worst kind, territorial. I don't see any positive movement.
 
If we are planning for 14 yrs tf to match with chinese can I know on what BE point,
The amount of PhD happening around china with related to material science , uap technology, AI ADS,
You need to be 4x time to be within the range of deterrence level if you want their peace of mind to get shaken
 
Sudden U.S. Shift Toward Pakistan: What Went Wrong?

Over the past two weeks, a noticeable shift has emerged in U.S. foreign policy under President Trump—one that tilts unexpectedly toward Pakistan. This change has left India puzzled, especially given the strong goodwill fostered since Trump’s inauguration on January 20. During Prime Minister Modi’s February visit to the White House, Trump referred to him as “my friend Modi,” and both sides were working toward an ambitious, tariff-free trade agreement aimed at reaching $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030—a potential model for future global trade. In addition President Trump’s stated policy of freeing America from the Chinese manufacturing prowess and bringing it back home, India fitted well as an alternative manufacturing destination to cut Chinese import cash flow significantly. That is all well and good and had India’s support.

But everything changed on April 22, when a Pakistan-based terror group attacked Kashmir, killing 26 Hindu tourists in broad daylight. Surprisingly, most Western nations, including the U.S., were slow and muted in condemning the atrocity. India responded with a long-overdue airstrike on May 7, targeting the terror group’s headquarters and dealing a decisive blow to them.
Pakistan’s military retaliated, triggering four days of escalating conflict. Initially, U.S. Vice President JD Vance distanced America from the situation, calling it a bilateral conflict. However, following India’s successful strikes against the Pakistani Air Force, the U.S. tone shifted significantly—unexpectedly favouring Pakistan.

This pivot was amplified by Western media, which began echoing exaggerated narratives of Pakistani success, despite its air force—equipped with Chinese weapons—suffering heavy losses. These stories, seemingly endorsed by Western governments, added insult to injury for India. In fact, untested Chinese military hardware failed miserably which probably would enhance the American military planners in South China Sea as and when Chinese become too ambitious and attack Taiwan.

India, shocked by this sudden reversal in U.S. mood, is now searching for answers. Theories include:
1. A newfound U.S. strategic interest in Pakistan

2.Pakistani promises of significant geopolitical value

3. Western unease over India’s rising global influence

4. A false report of a nuclear incident influencing U.S. response

After more than a decade of careful diplomacy, India finds itself at a low point in relations with the U.S. The trade deal now hangs in the balance, and a major diplomatic effort will be needed to restore trust and realign strategic interests.
 
That crypto council of Pakistan is a good risk by pakistan, and recent 2000MW dedicated for mining bitcoin (the remaining ones). They are adapting quickly to changes while nirmala tai still thinks that cryptos are dangerous hawala tools.
 
New Delhi:
Asked if the world has to thank the US for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar has said he would thank the Indian forces because they made Pakistan reach out and say "we are ready to stop".
 
I have always had the same mindset, that we need to have a strong defensive posture against the Northern threat. But lately, I've started thinking that maybe our best defence would be to keep the Chinese on the backfoot. Be aggressive, cultivate a serious offensive ability against the Chinese.

Because in a defensive posture, the Chinese have the peace of mind that any war will be initiated by them and that even if they lose a war, the loss would not mean loss of territory, nor will they take a hit to their strategic targets unlike what we just did to Pakistan. They know that a loss against us merely means that we managed to fight them to a standstill. We need to rob the Chinese strategic planners of this peace of mind. That is the lesson in deterrence from OpSindoor that must be applied on our Northern Front. And this is not a tactical or an operational goal. This has the potential to affect the Grand Strategy of the enemy.

But how to do it? Out of the capabilities we can develop:-
>A Strike Corps leading a ground invasion into China is the hardest to achieve given our already massive Army size. We can't raise more units. What we have now is barely sufficient for a two front war. So the only way to do that is to decisively defeat Pak enough to be able to do a 2020 I Strike Corps type transfer of formations from Western front to Northern front. And this involves a complete change in equipment and training, not just an air force style pivot between the fronts.

>An offensive air campaign capability. This is medium hardness. PLAAF is better than us in density of AD, EW and AEW&CS. In quality of jets, we are behind but closing the gap. In quantity of jets, we are level in a short war and woefully unprepared in a long war. And we are losing edge due to more numerous Chinese airbases and their improved hardening which is catching up to ours. As long as our CATS and AMCA come online at least, this is a non starter.

>An offensive missile campaign. Lowest hanging fruit, but still has significant challenges. Their AD had weaknesses but they are no Pakistan. The sheer density of their AD assets is much more than our own, look at their orbat. And they have an IADS supplied by an endless capacity of their military industry. In addition to their AD, the number of and distance to targets is also enormous. Most are outside our missile reach. And our missiles are in perpetual trials, lack in magazine capacity, lack in range and lack in aerial strike platforms for launch. And this is the lowest hanging fruit.

Let me clarify, I am not talking about tactical targets, I am talking about strategic ones. Like Chengdu.

And there is the Cyber dimension that I completely neglected because frankly I have very little idea about it.

Overall, achieving what I suggest currently seems difficult if not outright impossible. But in our military perspective planning of 15 years hence, this must be a major goal. To take peace away from the mind of the Chinese planner. To establish deterrence.
While I fully agree that the Chinese have a peace of mind vis-à-vis India, especially Tibet gives China thousands of kilometres of buffer land. I also agree that this is not good. See, actual fighting will take place in North East only, and it is from there only we can hit South China. Maybe in that case Myanmar can also emerge as battleground. Entering Myanmar and from there to hit China should also be a goal.


Their AD is strong or weak even dosent matter, a drone swarm or rocket barrage wont effect much of China, as they will let 90% of them complete their journey, same luxury wont be there for us.
 

'Any support to Pakistan is a support to terror organisation': TMC’s Abhisekh Banerjee​



View: https://youtu.be/EFCroVRhzSg


Shahi Tharoor in USA replying with accents (who like status quo and economy):
"India is not interested in warfare with Pakistan, rather be left alone to grow our economy."

Owaisi in Bharain (who hate Muslim brotherhood):
"These people has misquoted Kuran, They indulge in Takfiri, There is no difference their mindset and ISIS mindset.

Jaishankar in Eupore (Who would like to be work together but with some respect given)
"Europe can give a lot of values to world, We see europe as big trade partner, and playing bigger security Partner."

Abhishek Banarjee to Korean (with K-Drama esque like Young Face, with glasses with Corporate like demeanor in presentation):
"We ended up successfully destroyed the 9 terror structure without endangering single civilian life"

I must say there has been great thought in choosing ideal candidate to the respective nations, according to client temperament and nature. Also, our restrained response is good taking-point while telling others.
 

‘Not interested in warfare with Pakistan, rather be left alone to grow our economy,' Tharoor​



View: https://youtu.be/eP89ysV9I0k


Stupid thing to say…

War economy is the real economy, it makes you develop indigenous supply chains better than any govt policies.

War is always good for innovations, indigenous systems, internal security
 
Shahi Tharoor in USA replying with accents (who like status quo and economy):
"India is not interested in warfare with Pakistan, rather be left alone to grow our economy."

Owaisi in Bharain (who hate Muslim brotherhood):
"These people has misquoted Kuran, They indulge in Takfiri, There is no difference their mindset and ISIS mindset.

Jaishankar in Eupore (Who would like to be work together but with some respect given)
"Europe can give a lot of values to world, We see europe as big trade partner, and playing bigger security Partner."

Abhishek Banarjee to Korean (with K-Drama esque like Young Face, with glasses with Corporate like demeanor in presentation):
"We ended up successfully destroyed the 9 terror structure without endangering single civilian life"

I must say there has been great thought in choosing ideal candidate to the respective nations, according to client temperament and nature. Also, our restrained response is good taking-point while telling others.

and stalin's daughter was sent to russia.


View: https://x.com/ANI/status/1925964413556666554
 
Stupid thing to say…

War economy is the real economy, it makes you develop indigenous supply chains better than any govt policies.

War is always good for innovations, indigenous systems, internal security

these are diplomatic statements informed by inputs from Indian ambassador in U.S, not statements under oath.
 
Shahi Tharoor in USA replying with accents (who like status quo and economy):
"India is not interested in warfare with Pakistan, rather be left alone to grow our economy."

Owaisi in Bharain (who hate Muslim brotherhood):
"These people has misquoted Kuran, They indulge in Takfiri, There is no difference their mindset and ISIS mindset.

Jaishankar in Eupore (Who would like to be work together but with some respect given)
"Europe can give a lot of values to world, We see europe as big trade partner, and playing bigger security Partner."

Abhishek Banarjee to Korean (with K-Drama esque like Young Face, with glasses with Corporate like demeanor in presentation):
"We ended up successfully destroyed the 9 terror structure without endangering single civilian life"

I must say there has been great thought in choosing ideal candidate to the respective nations, according to client temperament and nature. Also, our restrained response is good taking-point while telling others.
I believe it is a way to convey an important message to the world: if Pakistan initiates any further incidents, we will not agree to a ceasefire.
 
Sudden U.S. Shift Toward Pakistan: What Went Wrong?

Over the past two weeks, a noticeable shift has emerged in U.S. foreign policy under President Trump—one that tilts unexpectedly toward Pakistan. This change has left India puzzled, especially given the strong goodwill fostered since Trump’s inauguration on January 20. During Prime Minister Modi’s February visit to the White House, Trump referred to him as “my friend Modi,” and both sides were working toward an ambitious, tariff-free trade agreement aimed at reaching $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030—a potential model for future global trade. In addition President Trump’s stated policy of freeing America from the Chinese manufacturing prowess and bringing it back home, India fitted well as an alternative manufacturing destination to cut Chinese import cash flow significantly. That is all well and good and had India’s support.

But everything changed on April 22, when a Pakistan-based terror group attacked Kashmir, killing 26 Hindu tourists in broad daylight. Surprisingly, most Western nations, including the U.S., were slow and muted in condemning the atrocity. India responded with a long-overdue airstrike on May 7, targeting the terror group’s headquarters and dealing a decisive blow to them.
Pakistan’s military retaliated, triggering four days of escalating conflict. Initially, U.S. Vice President JD Vance distanced America from the situation, calling it a bilateral conflict. However, following India’s successful strikes against the Pakistani Air Force, the U.S. tone shifted significantly—unexpectedly favouring Pakistan.

This pivot was amplified by Western media, which began echoing exaggerated narratives of Pakistani success, despite its air force—equipped with Chinese weapons—suffering heavy losses. These stories, seemingly endorsed by Western governments, added insult to injury for India. In fact, untested Chinese military hardware failed miserably which probably would enhance the American military planners in South China Sea as and when Chinese become too ambitious and attack Taiwan.

India, shocked by this sudden reversal in U.S. mood, is now searching for answers. Theories include:
1. A newfound U.S. strategic interest in Pakistan

2.Pakistani promises of significant geopolitical value

3. Western unease over India’s rising global influence

4. A false report of a nuclear incident influencing U.S. response

After more than a decade of careful diplomacy, India finds itself at a low point in relations with the U.S. The trade deal now hangs in the balance, and a major diplomatic effort will be needed to restore trust and realign strategic interests.
India should firmly avoid us military hardware slowly. we have to create R&D environment still more in robust manner, by organically or by espionage- everything works. Atleast Jews have USA for all weather help. Bharath has not many. We need to use Americans for economy, but should not depend on military tech- double edged sword that is..
 

View: https://x.com/erbmjha/status/1926894538649424063?t=0jsZa9pg25kabG8Y4fubNw&s=19

Why wasn't this whore flagged on sm before? I'm sure Intel agencies were tracking her but how come someone who went this recently to Porkistan with this sort of armed escort went unnoticed by most of us? I'm now beginning to doubt Nikhil naz and Vikrant Gupta too.

It was a whole hindu jatha who were going for katasraj visit.Thanks to the seized phones of pakistani isi embassy staff most folks are getting caught.
 
Sudden U.S. Shift Toward Pakistan: What Went Wrong?

Over the past two weeks, a noticeable shift has emerged in U.S. foreign policy under President Trump—one that tilts unexpectedly toward Pakistan. This change has left India puzzled, especially given the strong goodwill fostered since Trump’s inauguration on January 20. During Prime Minister Modi’s February visit to the White House, Trump referred to him as “my friend Modi,” and both sides were working toward an ambitious, tariff-free trade agreement aimed at reaching $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030—a potential model for future global trade. In addition President Trump’s stated policy of freeing America from the Chinese manufacturing prowess and bringing it back home, India fitted well as an alternative manufacturing destination to cut Chinese import cash flow significantly. That is all well and good and had India’s support.

But everything changed on April 22, when a Pakistan-based terror group attacked Kashmir, killing 26 Hindu tourists in broad daylight. Surprisingly, most Western nations, including the U.S., were slow and muted in condemning the atrocity. India responded with a long-overdue airstrike on May 7, targeting the terror group’s headquarters and dealing a decisive blow to them.
Pakistan’s military retaliated, triggering four days of escalating conflict. Initially, U.S. Vice President JD Vance distanced America from the situation, calling it a bilateral conflict. However, following India’s successful strikes against the Pakistani Air Force, the U.S. tone shifted significantly—unexpectedly favouring Pakistan.

This pivot was amplified by Western media, which began echoing exaggerated narratives of Pakistani success, despite its air force—equipped with Chinese weapons—suffering heavy losses. These stories, seemingly endorsed by Western governments, added insult to injury for India. In fact, untested Chinese military hardware failed miserably which probably would enhance the American military planners in South China Sea as and when Chinese become too ambitious and attack Taiwan.

India, shocked by this sudden reversal in U.S. mood, is now searching for answers. Theories include:
1. A newfound U.S. strategic interest in Pakistan

2.Pakistani promises of significant geopolitical value

3. Western unease over India’s rising global influence

4. A false report of a nuclear incident influencing U.S. response

After more than a decade of careful diplomacy, India finds itself at a low point in relations with the U.S. The trade deal now hangs in the balance, and a major diplomatic effort will be needed to restore trust and realign strategic interests.
Before April 22 there was qatar bribery and many things from turkiye and china.


 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top