DRDO & PSUs (32 Viewers)

INDIA’S FIRST MOORED AUTONOMOUS
UNDERWATER SONAR SYSTEM TRIAL
.
View attachment 41859
timing must be related to aussie defence pact.
======

Indian pact bolsters undersea surveillance​

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2025-07-03/indian-pact-bolsters-undersea-surveillance


India, Australia pact on undersea surveillance comes into force with focus on early detection, tracking of submarines & autonomous underwater vehicles. Australia Statement:

View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1940629546950447298
 
Ade lab is in bangalore then what tests are happening in hyderabad? I thought drdo uses hal airport as flight test range and for mk2 we will use chitradurga range. But what is the prototype doing in hyd?
Maybe Rci and drdl are helping
Tests could be anything like stealth validation or vibration tests
We dont know for sure
But this person got this knowledge from exhibitions and talking to people
And he was the one who uploaded swift video first,quite credible i guess?
Nonetheless we will find out whether its true or not
 
Lolz it was out of drdo hence it was effective due to direct hiring from merit academia and research institutes rather than low merit reservation system and bureaucrats harrassing the scientists under the influence of cag and cia stooge babus leaking info to adversaries.

Rajeev chandrasekhar kid is a usa citizen so I have doubts why bring batl under drdo.
Do prostitute vilap elsewhere. Embrace drdo, otherwise motabhai adani or L&T will slap a sticker on some israeli weapon and call it atmanirbhar. If merging BATL in Drdo looks stupid to you, definitely you are the wrong one. Hearing about brahmos ng for eternity, couldn't even see one working prototype, just tons of hopium from Sudhir Mishra. While drdo comes up with sfdr and now lrfj. Get Outta here. I believe what I see not some beautiful talks of a promised super uber product.
 
Do prostitute vilap elsewhere. Embrace drdo, otherwise motabhai adani or L&T will slap a sticker on some israeli weapon and call it atmanirbhar.

If merging BATL in Drdo looks stupid to you, definitely you are the wrong one.
He does have a point. BAPL was conceived as a pvt co to cut through all the red tape normally associated the bureaucracy in case of a DPSU. With the coming of BAPL to the fold of the DRDO all the advantages thus accrued on account of being a pvt co goes out of the window. Now it's just another DPSU.
Hearing about brahmos ng for eternity, couldn't even see one working prototype, just tons of hopium from Sudhir Mishra.
Please remember this is a JV with the Russians controlling 49.5 % stake. We don't know what the inside track is but over the years listening to various commentators on the subject of Indo Russian defence ties apart from reading about the subject , what comes across quite clearly is the fairly acrimonious exchanges behind closed doors.

You could describe it as a typical marriage where eventually things work out after mutual compromises. So we don't really know what kept the project from being realised all this while but I don't think it was a technology problem per se . I've already informed you on what could have been the issue.
While drdo comes up with sfdr and now lrfj. Get Outta here. I believe what I see not some beautiful talks of a promised super uber product.
 
N

Not in the same class, first mmma was supposed to be based on c295.
A smaller turboprop, and mainly was for near coast surveillance, mostly against lurking paki subs.


But beyond platforms, the sensor suite was not as extensive as p8is, along with mmma having secondary transport role, search and rescue, pollution/oil spill detection roles, because it was "mainly pitched to coast guard" .
 
Guys can Netra control some missile like Astra to hit targets at larger ranges than the launching fight jet can "see".



1751530356557.webp

pic for your attention
 
Guys can Netra control some missile like Astra to hit targets at larger ranges than the launching fight jet can "see".



View attachment 42070

pic for your attention
obviously, we have demonstrated it too last year, mk1 had radar off and netra guided the astra to hit the target

the integrated network has this advantage, tejas or any other iaf fighter can launch missile on target through the eyes(radar) of any other iaf aircraft
 
obviously, we have demonstrated it too last year, mk1 had radar off and netra guided the astra to hit the target

the integrated network has this advantage, tejas or any other iaf fighter can launch missile on target through the eyes(radar) of any other iaf aircraft

Have any links to this, I remember hearing about this but i'm googling now and nothing is turning up.

can we do this with imported maal also or do we need everything deshi like the fighter jet radar, missile etc
 
Have any links to this, I remember hearing about this but i'm googling now and nothing is turning up.
same man, suddenly nothing is turning up as if it never happened, i am sure this happened, i remember the news though.

and ig yes rafale should also guide others and take guidance from netra because of integrated network like link16/link17, sensor data is shared among all
 
N
Not in the same class, first mmma was supposed to be based on c295.
A smaller turboprop, and mainly was for near coast surveillance, mostly against lurking paki subs.


But beyond platforms, the sensor suite was not as extensive as p8is, along with mmma having secondary transport role, search and rescue, pollution/oil spill detection roles, because it was "mainly pitched to coast guard" .
Sensor suite of MMMA is more advanced than P8i especially it's radar & it comes with a lot of contemporary technologies.
Post in thread 'DRDO & PSUs'

https://defenceforumbharat.com/threads/drdo-psus.23/post-88276

Moreover quantity have it's own quality, 15 MMMA will provide much higher coverage than 6 P8i.

Now entire MMMA project will be put on back burner.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top