This is not feasible. We don't have budget for all that. Instead the mk5 & mk6 should be derived from astra mk3. There is no need to reinvent wheel in you're vision you're just reinventing phoenix & r37.
For loyal wing man they have already made it clear ngccm by default for them. No mk4 nothing like that is needed. Today's iir missile are most lethal the seeker technology can counter all counter measures. they have good ranges too. And its better to have a iir one instead of rf for a loyal wing man. Especially against low observable aircrafts.
Instead of spending money in this they should do advancement in astra mk1 & mk2 the Americans are squeezing out so much from they're amraam.
We need to work to advance our solid fuel grains,
Compaction of sledge. Which will result in more fuel storage.
Miniaturizing internal components, electronics and all.
Advances in seeker are already going on as we see. This advances can together be put in astra mk1 and astra mk2.
Fuel advancements are must Americans are so ahead in this tells us how long we can progress that too without dual pulse. This advancements can help us in other programs too.
If we are able to squeeze out performance from solid fuel rocket motor like Americans if we do enough advancements then astra mk1 & mk2 will be altogether a world class beast.
Abt astra mk3 which is altogether a different class of missile. Should also undergo similar advancements.
In short we need to work alot on solid fuel & solid fuel grains.
With the emergence of next generation AAM missiles concepts from the US and China, coupled with the proliferation of 5th gen platforms in our neighborhood and the growing significance of Loyal Wingman in future battles, highlights the need for us to be future ready and start developing the next generation of AAMs or risk falling behind."
Here is my vision for the future of BVR missiles in IAF
Astra Mk 1
| Max Range | 80-110 km |
| Technology Used | Single Pulse Rocket Motor |
| Target | Fighter Jets at Double Digit Ranges |
| Maneuverability and Carriage | Can be carried in IWB and is highly Maneuverable |
| Warhead | Small 15kg PF warhead |
| Similar Systems | AMRAAM |
| My reasons | Is comparatively Cheap and provides an competitive edge over most of the current PAF inventory, would be useful as a standard BVR for secondary fighters like LCA |
Astra Mk 2
| Max Range | 140-160 km |
| Technology Used | Dual Pulse Rocket Motor |
| Target | Fighter Jets at Long Double Digit Ranges |
| Maneuverability and Carriage | Can be carried in IWB and is highly Maneuverable |
| Warhead | Small 20-25 kg PF warhead |
| Similar Systems | PL 15 |
| My reasons | Totally Dominates Current and Future PAF inventory and can provide a somewhat competitive edge over PLAAF inventory, would be useful as a standard BVR for frontline fighters |
Astra Mk 3
View attachment 10718
| Max Range | 250 - 300 km |
| Technology Used | Solid Fuel Ducted Ramjet |
| Target | Fighter Jets at Triple Digit Ranges |
| Maneuverability and Carriage | Can be carried in IWB and is highly Maneuverable |
| Warhead | Small 20- 25 kg PF warhead |
| Similar Systems | Meteor |
| My reasons | Even though it's expensive, it totally Dominates Current and Future PAF inventory and can provide an competitive edge over PLAAF inventory, would be useful as a special use BVR for frontline fighters |
Astra Mk 4
View attachment 10710
| Max Range | 40-60 km (Max 80 km) |
| Technology Used | Relatively Single Pulse Rocket Motor |
| Target | Loyal Wingmen Drones at Double Digit Ranges |
| Maneuverability and Carriage | Half the size of current BVR's and can be carried in IWB of Smaller Loyal Wingman like CATS Warrior |
| Warhead | Hit to kill (similar to PAC-3) |
| Similar Systems | Lockheed Martin’s CUDA |
| My reasons | Loyal Wingmen need to be low cost and expendable which means they need to be relatively small in size due to which our standard missile can't fit in their IWB and thus a CUDA class missile the size of SAAW will be a perfect fit.
Not to mention it would allow 5th gen platforms to carry a lot more Missile in the IWB. |
Astra Mk 5
View attachment 10713
| Max Range | 300-350 km |
| Technology Used | Triple Pulsed (2 stage missile) |
| Target | Fighter Jets at Triple Digit Ranges |
| Maneuverability and Carriage | Can only be carried externally on big fighters like Su 30 and is highly Maneuverable |
| Warhead | Small 20- 25 kg PF warhead |
| Similar Systems | Boeing LRAAM |
| My reasons | Can be used in a mesh network against enemy fighters where 5th gen platforms relay the target info to larger platforms in the back which would fire this missile at the target.
Could be a cheaper alternative to Astra Mk 3 |
Astra Mk 6
View attachment 10717
| Max Range | 400-450 km |
| Technology Used | 2 stage Dual Pulse Rocket Motor |
| Target | Support Assets (AWACS) at Long Triple Digit Ranges |
| Maneuverability and Carriage | Can only be carried externally on big fighters like Su 30 and is not very maneuverable |
| Warhead | Large 50- 60 kg PF warhead |
| Similar Systems | PL 17 or AIM-174B |
| My reasons | It is less technologically complex than Astra Mk 3 and is badly needed to counterbalance the high numbers of AWACS and Tankers present in both PAF and PLAAF.
The missile would be a 2 stage missile with 1st stage being dropped mid flight, allowing it to reach longer ranges and destroy enemy assets. |
m.economictimes.com
