Chit Chat

[Vinash]

Its published in 2021. SKC wanted books which are not published latter. Can you tell me what this book brings into light which Sat Charitra did not bring?

I have had another book written on Sai Baba - which also is research book - which mentions Sai Bab was born to a Brahmin Family who gave away boy. he learned from both hindu and sufi saint. But I am not sure about its research. I use Sai Charitra as authentic book to reflect upon because it was written by a close devotee and is actually collection of random stories from Sai baba's life.

Do you know he had his ears pierced as they were done by Hindu brahmins? He was not circumcised as Muslim would. And he kept a Dhuni fire burning continuously and meditated upon? Or he expounded on Geeta's Sanskrit Shloka - that too chosen by devotees and at random?

Lives of Guru Nanak, Ramkrishna Paramhansa, Sai Baba, Mahaavatar babaji, Paramhansa Yogananada, Ramana Maharishi and even Sri M - tell you that Sadhus in true sense are unattached with Names and forms. But start seeing Ultimate Reality , Paramatma holistically. Saadh ki Jaat na poochiye pooch lijiye gyan. Its for a reason give Name, Caste and attire when he ordains Sadhu hood journey.

Worship him if you want. No Hindu deity can possibly be born as late as 1800's.

Also, if you consider him to be a Guru, that's fine. Don't place him alongside other Deities.

 

[Anants]

I don't want any book at all. I am not looking to find any answers about him! I am not the one living in any delusion about him.

Most of the claims about his life are made by his cult followers much after he died.​

not Satcharitra. It was written in Sai baba's later years. Ofcourse upto you what your beliefs are. But this "agitation" is going to miff a large section hindus in Maharashtra, Karnataka as well Andhra.

 

[Vinash]

not Satcharitra. It was written in Sai baba's later years. Ofcourse upto you what your beliefs are. But this "agitation" is going to miff a large section hindus in Maharashtra, Karnataka as well Andhra.

Is he a Guru or a God like Krishna?

 

[Anants]

Worship him if you want. No Hindu deity can possibly be born as late as 1800's.

Also, if you consider him to be a Guru, that's fine. Don't place him alongside other Deities.

You shall be surprised. Gurur Brahma Gurur Vishno.. you must have heard. Its precisely you will find Gurus idols inside temples along with deities.. not just Sai Baba. And many enlightened Gurus were enshrined after 1800's

 

[Vinash]

You shall be surprised. Gurur Brahma Gurur Vishno.. you must have heard. Its precisely you will find Gurus idols inside temples along with deities.. not just Sai Baba. And many enlightened Gurus were enshrined after 1800's

Just because Dindus have normalized Dev ninda doesn't mean it's acceptable.

Gurus are great men but have no place alongside Deities.

Then again, this is a napumsak community that sees shakti in even insta thots.

 

[Anants]

Is he a Guru or a God like Krishna?

He never claimed either. He usually said to his devotees that he is the humble insect stuck on the dirt below slippers. That he was blessed to have your Darshana. Though there was one instance where he gave "Naam" to one devotee in his last days. He asked devotees to chant "Raja Ram Raja Ram" continuously in heart.

 

[SKC]

not Satcharitra. It was written in Sai baba's later years. Ofcourse upto you what your beliefs are. But this "agitation" is going to miff a large section hindus in Maharashtra, Karnataka as well Andhra.

Let them get agitated.

Either do things correctly else don't cry about interference of Adharmis on Sanatan Dharma, Govt Control on Temples, Prasadam issue in Tirupati, etc-etc

 

[Vinash]

He never claimed either. He usually said to his devotees that he is the humble insect stuck on the dirt below slippers. That he was blessed to have your Darshana. Though there was one instance where he gave "Naam" to one devotee in his last days. He asked devotees to chant "Raja Ram Raja Ram" continuously in heart.

Treat him like an insect then. Why elevate him to god status?

 

[Vinash]

Let them get agitated.

Either do things correctly else don't cry about interference of Adharmis on Sanatan Dharma, Govt Control on Temples, Prasadam issue in Tirupati, etc-etc

Apparently we must accept blasphemy because some confused Hindus will get triggered.

 

[SKC]

These guys are retards. Hinduism consolidated by assimilating all local gurus, babas, sects, etc. It even assimilated Buddhism in India.

These guys are acting like those Muslims who fight about how pure their sect is.

Wait till few days, Christians will assimilate Sai baba, and all his followers will be Christian.

Enough of this assimilation of any random baba into Hindu Pantheon!
We already have so many of them who cause large scale ridicule of Hindus and Sanatan.

I will be very happy if he gets inducted into Christianity instead!​

 

[Anants]

Just because Dindus have normalized Dev ninda doesn't mean it's acceptable.

Gurus are great men but have no place alongside Deities.

Yes according to vaishvanite philosphy where distinction is made between Supreme and Jivatamas.
But not in Advaita Philosophy of Shankra.

गुरू ब्रह्मा गुरू विष्णु, गुरु देवो महेश्वरा गुरु साक्षात परब्रह्म, तस्मै श्री गुरुवे नम:

In this enlightened Guru is considered one with Supreme. When Swami Vivekananda ji had doubt in his mind when Ramakrishna was in last days and in pain - "He thought in mind - Guru at least now tell me who you are?". Immediately Sri Ramakrishna looked at him at said: "Jo Ram hai Jo Krishna hai wohi Ram Krishna hai"

 

[SKC]

Odd Day - "We must protect the Dharma! Sanatan is Supreme!"

Even Day - "Induct fake guru as Hindu God otherwise many will get agitated!"

 

[Vinash]

Yes according to vaishvanite philosphy where distinction is made between Supreme and Jivatamas.
But not in Advaita Philosophy of Shankra.

गुरू ब्रह्मा गुरू विष्णु, गुरु देवो महेश्वरा गुरु साक्षात परब्रह्म, तस्मै श्री गुरुवे नम:

In this enlightened Guru is considered one with Supreme. When Swami Vivekananda ji had doubt in his mind when Ramakrishna was in last days and in pain - "He thought in mind - Guru at least now tell me who you are?". Immediately Sri Ramakrishna looked at him at said: "Jo Ram hai Jo Krishna hai wohi Ram Krishna hai"

You are entitled to your opinion. It's blasphemy to me.

Baba followers should go and build separate Temples. He doesn't have a place alongside other Hindu deities.

 

[Anants]

Let them get agitated.

Either do things correctly else don't cry about interference of Adharmis on Sanatan Dharma, Govt Control on Temples, Prasadam issue in Tirupati, etc-etc

You are talking about rules of which school of Sanatan? Are you saying you are happy in creating division in hindus for imagined sanatan infringement on issue? Are you going to lay down rules what dieties gurus one can worship or not? If yes- then good luck getting hindus unites, because indian villages are full of Gurus and local beliefs which never fit your imagined sanatani rules.

 

[Vinash]

Odd Day - "We must protect the Dharma! Sanatan is Supreme!"

Even Day - "Induct fake guru as Hindu God otherwise many will get agitated!"

If Dindus have their way, they'll induct this 9 year old fat fuck as the next deity.


View: https://x.com/JaikyYadav16/status/1833514827056050420

 

[Vinash]

You are talking about rules of which school of Sanatan? Are you saying you are happy in creating division in hindus for imagined sanatan infringement on issue? Are you going to lay down rules what dieties gurus one can worship or not? If yes- then good luck getting hindus unites, because indian villages are full of Gurus and local beliefs which never fit your imagined sanatani rules.

No wonder jokers have been taking L's for a 1000 years.

Hindu gods have rightly abandoned jokers who elevate every retard to god status.

 

[shade2]

This is like the Lingayata changing teams to the "secular" side in KA elections but in a non political format.

 

[Anants]

Odd Day - "We must protect the Dharma! Sanatan is Supreme!"

Even Day - "Induct fake guru as Hindu God otherwise many will get agitated!"

Prove that. Because Gurus are integral to Sanatan Dharma. Unless you are saying the whole Guru system is not Sanatani - which is first and new for me. You actually represent classical Trad Hindu Raitas - finding everything Hindu offensive over one's own imagined version of Sanatan Dharma Fanatasy.

Sanatan Shall remain steadfast even every single one of us hindus vanishes. Save onself by adopting Dharma. Thats the best one can do for own benefit.

 

[OutForVendetta]

Watches it with my own eyes

 

[Vinash]

Prove that. Because Gurus are integral to Sanatan Dharma. Unless you are saying the whole Guru system is not Sanatani - which is first and new for me. You actually represent classical Trad Hindu Raitas - finding everything Hindu offensive over one's own imagined version of Sanatan Dharma Fanatasy.

Sanatan Shall remain steadfast even every single one of us hindus vanishes. Save onself by adopting Dharma. Thats the best one can do for own benefit.

Gurus are servants of God.

Stop elevating their status to God tier.