And those are just short ranged ones. If you take things like SDBs, the deviation becomes even more prominent. But then again there's some caveat in this too. This was USA's "Indian defence preparedness" moment
• As far back as 2016, not US just military intelligence but even defence reporting houses were writing detailed article on Russian GPS tampering
View attachment 16559
View attachment 16560
• What's even more interesting is that some OSINTs and ultra-autistic SMEs were able to accurately trace the location of this exact jammer; named the Baltic jammer
View: https://x.com/auonsson/status/1775216532030713871
• And even after all these the US DoD failed to grasp the severity of this problem and do something to mitigate it. No a single large scale program was initiated to upgrade the existing GNSS receivers with more robust anti-jam/spoof ones.
On top of everything the M-Code GPS system planned to be fully operational by 2016 have been continuously facing delays.
• Not to mention the fact that whatever limited jam-proof confidential GPS they've is not going out the mainland this early in development.
Holy hell!! Thanks for the share, bookmarking this for future reference.
Yeah, I kinda knew it all along but was hoping against hope. At some level, I was coping as well, LMAO. But really, I can't figure out what could have made the rocket deviate so much when we have witnessed the accuracy of the land attack version of BrahMos with the same GPS-INS guidance.I doubt it
Generally only one feature is tested at a time so that it's easier to figure out what went wrong like at first it's just captive carry of a bomb, then release in next trail, guidance in next and ultimately in the final you've a complete bomb with live warhead.
I don't think they're going to test full fledged GPS denied testing this early in its trials.
Last edited: