Idiotic Musings from the West

No.
These white people who make reaction videos are mostly the ONLY white people who have a genuine grasp of Indian culture and tend to be highly pro-indian in most things. Ofcourse, i am talking of the well established handles like Jaby Kooey, Achara Kirk, the 'our stupid reactions' people etc.

The cardinal rule of cultural propagation is 'never discourage a foreigner for showing any form of interest in your culture'. That is an opportunity for cultural conversion, which the arabs and moozies are experts at doing fyi.
If history has told that goras are very good at U-turn. Before colonisation of india ,there was this huge love and competition for everything Indian .Goras were scrambling to find India and learn.
After gora learned And subsequently India was colonised,every Indophile gora took U-turn. So I say make them do your bidding china but keep them at arms length again like china.
 
If history has told that goras are very good at U-turn. Before colonisation of india ,there was this huge love and competition for everything Indian .Goras were scrambling to find India and learn.
After gora learned And subsequently India was colonised,every Indophile gora took U-turn. So I say make them do your bidding china but keep them at arms length again like china.

No. Your chronology is wrong.
Before colonisation, goras treated us as vermin heathen that needs to be civilised. ALL gora writings on India pre 1750s was 'land of darkness somewhat civilised by mohammedans but needs christianity' type of writings.
AFTER colonisation, came the love affair with India, when goras got access to Indian culture, especially via posted troops and administrators, which was immediately squashed by the Aryan theory peddlings.
Then there was a resurrection of sort in the late 1800s, around 1870s-1910s as Aryanism grew in Europe and some of them saw us as the original homeland, etc. but then Hitler happened and that all died.

I will not advocate copying China, because China is a completely different beast - for one, they are a far more homogenous society than us, with effectively 90% of China being Han- imagine if 90% of India was the hindi belt, that is China ( where their language & culture variations are like variations in Hindi culture between Bihar and Haryana etc). For two, China has had a 'chosen people' narrative for 2000+ years, where they saw themselves as the civilizers of barbarians living around them.
This is what sparked the tai-kadai and mon-khmer migrations out of south china in the first place.

Advocating we adopt Chinese solution is like saying a cat should be given the same diet as a dog. It doesnt work.
Our strength is multiculturalism. We simply have to get the message across that we are the mai-baap of multiculturalism and the tolerant civilisation historically.
Play to your strengths, not your weaknesses.
 
Our strength is multiculturalism. We simply have to get the message across that we are the mai-baap of multiculturalism and the tolerant civilisation historically.
Play to your strengths, not your weaknesses.
Agree as long as it’s not the violent strain of the pissful. They have no place in India’s society
 
As they say, perfection is the enemy of the good. If you wish to argue that there is no difference between unwiped, unwashed arse and washed arse in terms of germ dispersal, then have at it. With such logic, why even wipe your arse ? Just be like a cow or a rhino and go around with shyte caked around your arsehole.

Hygene is a matter of perception as much as it is a matter of science. Otherwise, no one would think yellowed teeth are less hygenic than sparkling white teeth.
beside this they like to lick their partners ass😂....guess they get their partner fresh nd stale poop tastes also by this. 🥶🤢🤮
 
Best way to deal with racism is to outright ignore it,
Our ancestors, Chinese and Jews did this throught history and the results were not good

Ignoring an issue never helps. If you are at the receiving end of racism find ways to deter that individual

The person subjecting you to racism has his own agenda of using you as e means too an end

Retaliation with goal of deterring the opponent is the only solution
 
Our ancestors, Chinese and Jews did this throught history and the results were not good

Ignoring an issue never helps. If you are at the receiving end of racism find ways to deter that individual

The person subjecting you to racism has his own agenda of using you as e means too an end

Retaliation with goal of deterring the opponent is the only solution
True. But I think I'm gonna start completely ignoring those animals. I have already uninstalled XItter,that sh!tty app has taken a toll on my mental health.
 
Our ancestors, Chinese and Jews did this throught history and the results were not good

Ignoring an issue never helps. If you are at the receiving end of racism find ways to deter that individual

The person subjecting you to racism has his own agenda of using you as e means too an end

Retaliation with goal of deterring the opponent is the only solution
I will disagree to this, as this is too simplistic in my 25+ years of experience in the west.
Those who are racist, will not be deterred by racism shown towards them, they will actually revel in it and fight harder, given that they BELIVE in race concept and will fight forever to assert their dominance in the race heirarchy. As the saying goes, never fight a pig in the mud : all that will happen is you will get dirty and the pig will like it, even if you get on top.

Remember, history also proves this true : racism is an invention of westerners. No other group of people have been racist, they have all been ethnocentrist. Ie, look at the Huns & Mongols in Chinese culture or the pre-islamic Turuska mlecchas in Indian culture, They were completely absorbed into the Chinese/Indian fold once they adopted the native religions,philosophies & customs. Ie, the concept of 'ethnos = best', where if you think like us, speak like us, believe like us, you are us.

Now look at the gypsies or Saami peoples - despite adopting religion, language, customs and being there for 1000+ years, they are still 'separate from us', because Europe came up with & believes in the concept of race - where to be us, you must be 'biologically us' - in greco-roman times, they had similar concept of ethnos as the rest of the world ( where people like Macedonians were considered greek, even though they were basically thracians who were hellenised by the Argead dynasty(Alexander's dynasty), who were 'true greeks'.
By the enlightenment era, this 'ethnocentrism' changed to racism, where they started to focus on 'being white/european' and then developed it into a psuedo-science in the 19th & 20th century.


In my experience, what works best with the racists, is to state these facts and disassociate oneself from racism, while being dismissive of the concept of race ( this is where science will help you, because race is scientifically a nonsense concept like palmistry and there is plenty of evidence of that).

The western psyche is, they want to take credit for 'civilizing the world' and as such, they try to claim every invention under the sun, but *not* the ones that carries a severe social cost to them. As such, they will try to prove that racism is not an european invention ( which too can be addressed by citation- there is scholarly articles on this).

Then you can throw in some 'calculated payback' to them, by speculating on the 'possible reasons' why Euros started racism by invoking race logic itself : Euros have predominantly recessive genes. What are recessive genes ? Genes that lose out to the dominant genes of their type. Ergo, recessive genes = inferior genes, as evolution is LITERALLY trying to weed out the recessive genes. Ergo, euros have a 'motive' to invent racism : to protect THEIR recessive genes by closed loop breeding.

Once you start to form the narrative ' Europeans invented racism-->racism is a bullshit concept--> Euros probably did this to protect their inferior genetic features' , THAT becomes checkmate for them.

The ones who argue ' superior/inferior' genes cannot escape the logic of 'recessive genes are inferior genes, you are people of recessive genes, so you invented racism to protect your recessive genes', neither can they accept it and one of three things happen:
a) they go silent
b) they go apeshit, frothing at the mouth and just going 'non-stop gaali' as their brain breaks
c) they quickly climb down from 'racism' and try to adopt a more 'ethnocentrism' mindset - and THAT is where you want them to be, because the western concept of ethnicity and ethnic relations is far weaker attachment and far easier to poke holes into.
 
I will disagree to this, as this is too simplistic in my 25+ years of experience in the west.
Those who are racist, will not be deterred by racism shown towards them, they will actually revel in it and fight harder, given that they BELIVE in race concept and will fight forever to assert their dominance in the race heirarchy. As the saying goes, never fight a pig in the mud : all that will happen is you will get dirty and the pig will like it, even if you get on top.

Remember, history also proves this true : racism is an invention of westerners. No other group of people have been racist, they have all been ethnocentrist. Ie, look at the Huns & Mongols in Chinese culture or the pre-islamic Turuska mlecchas in Indian culture, They were completely absorbed into the Chinese/Indian fold once they adopted the native religions,philosophies & customs. Ie, the concept of 'ethnos = best', where if you think like us, speak like us, believe like us, you are us.

Now look at the gypsies or Saami peoples - despite adopting religion, language, customs and being there for 1000+ years, they are still 'separate from us', because Europe came up with & believes in the concept of race - where to be us, you must be 'biologically us' - in greco-roman times, they had similar concept of ethnos as the rest of the world ( where people like Macedonians were considered greek, even though they were basically thracians who were hellenised by the Argead dynasty(Alexander's dynasty), who were 'true greeks'.
By the enlightenment era, this 'ethnocentrism' changed to racism, where they started to focus on 'being white/european' and then developed it into a psuedo-science in the 19th & 20th century.


In my experience, what works best with the racists, is to state these facts and disassociate oneself from racism, while being dismissive of the concept of race ( this is where science will help you, because race is scientifically a nonsense concept like palmistry and there is plenty of evidence of that).

The western psyche is, they want to take credit for 'civilizing the world' and as such, they try to claim every invention under the sun, but *not* the ones that carries a severe social cost to them. As such, they will try to prove that racism is not an european invention ( which too can be addressed by citation- there is scholarly articles on this).

Then you can throw in some 'calculated payback' to them, by speculating on the 'possible reasons' why Euros started racism by invoking race logic itself : Euros have predominantly recessive genes. What are recessive genes ? Genes that lose out to the dominant genes of their type. Ergo, recessive genes = inferior genes, as evolution is LITERALLY trying to weed out the recessive genes. Ergo, euros have a 'motive' to invent racism : to protect THEIR recessive genes by closed loop breeding.

Once you start to form the narrative ' Europeans invented racism-->racism is a bullshit concept--> Euros probably did this to protect their inferior genetic features' , THAT becomes checkmate for them.

The ones who argue ' superior/inferior' genes cannot escape the logic of 'recessive genes are inferior genes, you are people of recessive genes, so you invented racism to protect your recessive genes', neither can they accept it and one of three things happen:
a) they go silent
b) they go apeshit, frothing at the mouth and just going 'non-stop gaali' as their brain breaks
c) they quickly climb down from 'racism' and try to adopt a more 'ethnocentrism' mindset - and THAT is where you want them to be, because the western concept of ethnicity and ethnic relations is far weaker attachment and far easier to poke holes into.

I agree with some parts, but do you think a random redneck racist can hold such a conversation.
 
I agree with some parts, but do you think a random redneck racist can hold such a conversation.

Doesnt matter if they can hold it or not. This line of attack will STILL destroy them, even if they go 'hubba dubba pajeet arrooo' about it. Because this line of thought is STILL their kryptonite and at the end of the day, their options are still one of the three i outlined above.
 
If someone observes, the Anglo Globohomos occupied lands are very strategic in nature. Naturally isolated with huge ocean bodies with no need of worry of any land based enemies. USA, Canada, Australia, NZ and UK. It somehow isolates them from crowd. But in comedy, UK still somehow managed to have large number of muslims in it as of this year. What changed? Won't these countries like to keep themselves pure? Why does the elite cabal need the huge crowd as especially with their fertility rates, they will outnumber whites someday in UK. What is the plan of ruling elite in case they go out of control?
And in another context, is it juice playing behind the curtain always trying to control both sides so they win always?
 
China will tame them. Wignats are already coming to the realization that China can beat them even at physically intensive sports like Swimming. You should see the seethe on Twitter after a Chinese swimmer won the 100m freestyle swimming event by smashing the world record.

View attachment 5055


This could be bad for us though. Wignats will go after the easy target i.e India as they don't have the balls to take on China so they'll vent their frustration on the next target.

India is a social justice shithole which isn't anywhere near equipped to take on the West. West can play us like a fiddle by taking advantage of our fault lines.

NGO's, Christian missionaries, Islamists, Khalistanis, LGBT etc you name it, West has multiple foot soldiers in India.
Why do we all look to other people to solve the issue?????
 
If someone observes, the Anglo Globohomos occupied lands are very strategic in nature. Naturally isolated with huge ocean bodies with no need of worry of any land based enemies. USA, Canada, Australia, NZ and UK. It somehow isolates them from crowd. But in comedy, UK still somehow managed to have large number of muslims in it as of this year. What changed? Won't these countries like to keep themselves pure? Why does the elite cabal need the huge crowd as especially with their fertility rates, they will outnumber whites someday in UK. What is the plan of ruling elite in case they go out of control?

What changed, is technology. The channel is something like 30km wide at its narrowest and in a lot of places, its less than 100km wide. What that means, is that today, just about anyone can cut a tree, buy a 1000 dollar motor, 200 dollars in gas and ride the waves to the UK.

There is no 'controlling the access point' as they did 50-60 years ago, by keeping tabs on all the potential cargo ships/ferries etc. as to who can access them to cross the channel.

Aus/NZ/US/Canada are more sheltered due to being 1000+km by sea and in the case of USA, its land access to Latin America is already the exploited point of entry.

The elite cabal of anglosphere needs people. Their fertility problems are causing them to need MORE people, since except the US, every single anglosphere country relies on working age population to pay social security & healthcare of the retired people in their countries and if you enter a zone where retirees & U-18s( also dependents economically) outnumber the working age population, your system collapses.

So the lower their population growth rate is, the larger their need for immigrants are.

This is why the liberals in the west have abandoned race theory/racism and instead rely on moralism : they acknowledge that their survival on 'racial purity' is a dead-end numbers wise, so the next best case scenario is to 'culturally convert' the immigrants to make them 'cultural anglo-saxons'. This is the end game.
The fly in the ointment is the muslims : the liberals think that their superior 'liberal debauched values' will ultimately appeal to the base instincts of the muslim's childrens and you just gotta outwait a generation or two till these muslims absorb and become westerners. The conservatives think ( more accurately) that this is a bullshit pipe dream soaked in self-adulation of western liberals and with 'new arrivals' of hardcore islamists every day, the 'next generation or two' will never break out of the 'islamist exposure' and will instead wreck their country.
That is what the 'immigration culture wars' is all about.


And in another context, is it juice playing behind the curtain always trying to control both sides so they win always?

Blaming the juice is a cope-trope of abrahamics. This is again, because their fascist religions and their fascist racism ideology simply cannot deal with the concept of ' this teeny tiny minority, despite being beaten down by us, punches far above its weight and does mostly better than us in most metrics'.

Effectively, the anti-semetism in the western culture is directly parallel to the hinduphobia in the west: they stem from the same exact source.

Like, there is a reason why jews have been hated ONLY specifically by abrahamic dominant civilisations in history, with the ONLY exceptions being the Seleucids & Romans- people who actually tried to conquer the jewish homeland. Note how the jews often collaborated with the Persians during their uprisings with Rome (who were staunch zoroastrians at that time), how jews in India, jews in China ( where they've been present since 600s AD) shows practically zero anti-semetism and 'evol world controlling moneygrubbing jooz' shit.
This leads to only two likely conclusions:
a) jews are hated by abrahamic religions for 'reasons' ( as explained above)
b) jews are somehow able to control the abrahamic world by being evil snivelling rats but completely fail in the non-abrahamic world for 'reasons' (which do not really make any sense once you think on it).

Occam's razor is clear on which of the two options is more likely.

Don't make the mistake of jewphobia as they are one of our only potential allies in the long term in the western world.
 
I will disagree to this, as this is too simplistic in my 25+ years of experience in the west.
Those who are racist, will not be deterred by racism shown towards them, they will actually revel in it and fight harder, given that they BELIVE in race concept and will fight forever to assert their dominance in the race heirarchy. As the saying goes, never fight a pig in the mud : all that will happen is you will get dirty and the pig will like it, even if you get on top.

Remember, history also proves this true : racism is an invention of westerners. No other group of people have been racist, they have all been ethnocentrist. Ie, look at the Huns & Mongols in Chinese culture or the pre-islamic Turuska mlecchas in Indian culture, They were completely absorbed into the Chinese/Indian fold once they adopted the native religions,philosophies & customs. Ie, the concept of 'ethnos = best', where if you think like us, speak like us, believe like us, you are us.

Now look at the gypsies or Saami peoples - despite adopting religion, language, customs and being there for 1000+ years, they are still 'separate from us', because Europe came up with & believes in the concept of race - where to be us, you must be 'biologically us' - in greco-roman times, they had similar concept of ethnos as the rest of the world ( where people like Macedonians were considered greek, even though they were basically thracians who were hellenised by the Argead dynasty(Alexander's dynasty), who were 'true greeks'.
By the enlightenment era, this 'ethnocentrism' changed to racism, where they started to focus on 'being white/european' and then developed it into a psuedo-science in the 19th & 20th century.


In my experience, what works best with the racists, is to state these facts and disassociate oneself from racism, while being dismissive of the concept of race ( this is where science will help you, because race is scientifically a nonsense concept like palmistry and there is plenty of evidence of that).

The western psyche is, they want to take credit for 'civilizing the world' and as such, they try to claim every invention under the sun, but *not* the ones that carries a severe social cost to them. As such, they will try to prove that racism is not an european invention ( which too can be addressed by citation- there is scholarly articles on this).

Then you can throw in some 'calculated payback' to them, by speculating on the 'possible reasons' why Euros started racism by invoking race logic itself : Euros have predominantly recessive genes. What are recessive genes ? Genes that lose out to the dominant genes of their type. Ergo, recessive genes = inferior genes, as evolution is LITERALLY trying to weed out the recessive genes. Ergo, euros have a 'motive' to invent racism : to protect THEIR recessive genes by closed loop breeding.

Once you start to form the narrative ' Europeans invented racism-->racism is a bullshit concept--> Euros probably did this to protect their inferior genetic features' , THAT becomes checkmate for them.

The ones who argue ' superior/inferior' genes cannot escape the logic of 'recessive genes are inferior genes, you are people of recessive genes, so you invented racism to protect your recessive genes', neither can they accept it and one of three things happen:
a) they go silent
b) they go apeshit, frothing at the mouth and just going 'non-stop gaali' as their brain breaks
c) they quickly climb down from 'racism' and try to adopt a more 'ethnocentrism' mindset - and THAT is where you want them to be, because the western concept of ethnicity and ethnic relations is far weaker attachment and far easier to poke holes into.
when did turkroaches become like us nd think like us?? they always think us inferior race during their rule in india.
 
Why do we all look to other people to solve the issue?????
I don't.

I'm just being realistic that we can't take on the West right now. Probably never.

I'm not a China simp by any means.
 
Why do we all look to other people to solve the issue?????
That is just acknowledging the reality.
China lives in isolation of West and their relationships is very transnational.
We on the other hand are very susceptible to their thought process by design of our democracy and by the psyche of the masses.

Look at twitter Indian slander gets boosted by Elund, can we do something to address it?

There was this data sovereignty act that was scrapped by gormint when threatened by Murica.


China is a adversary to West, India is a potential client State that may as well end up as a vassal not literally but in thought process.

We are one election away from being a vassal.

No amount of coping will help, you might disagree but there is no ground to stand upon.
 
Our ancestors, Chinese and Jews did this throught history and the results were not good

Ignoring an issue never helps. If you are at the receiving end of racism find ways to deter that individual

The person subjecting you to racism has his own agenda of using you as e means too an end

Retaliation with goal of deterring the opponent is the only solution

Retaliation should not be through Racism, you do not go down to the level of the pigs.

Retaliation can only come through working hard, improving your self, and have your own social media, infiltrating into every level of Western institutions until you can pay them of or control them and being an independent self-serving nation.

You can complain on twitter all you want, but you are never going to get the reach thanks to the racist bastard that is heading it. Other wise, you will have to go to 'Peacefool' levels of extremism were heads starts to roll.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top