Indian Air Force: News & Discussions (23 Viewers)

[Interested]

agree...we should hv long range BVR capability. i think we should add two R37 bvr missile in every su 30 mki. same with every tejas, we should add two sky sting BVR missile. rest BVR missiles should be indian BVR missiles. sky sting hv two seekers (IR nd RF), so they can detect enemy aircrafts etc by itself from some range. so tejas lesser range aesa radar missile guidance disadvantage can increased by skysting dual seekers.

R37 is not a good A2A missile . Buy the Israeli one if need be but not more Russian junk .

 

[liberalredditor]

No indian jet is capable of handling j35 in one on one scenario

Heard of rafale with spectra war mode? Eurofighters could see the rafale in sky but in radar nothing was visible. This is the info out in public. Many say spectra war mode can pretty much make an a2a missile go mad and just become a piece of junk

So no need to dhoti shiver, wait for tejas mk2 or repeat order of rafale

 

[Hari Sud]

@Interested is correct, assuming an upgraded SU-30 MKI radar can detect 1m^2 RCS at 200 km then J-35 with assumed RCS of 0.05m^2 RCS will be detected at ~95 km by the same radar (~113km for 0.1m^2). There is a mathematical formula for this, you can use ChatGPT.

With just passive EW & RWR, J-35 will know where SU-30MKI is and can shoot first with PL-15s.

Rafale's OSF-IT might actually have a higher range (>125km) to detect J-35s if it knows where to look at that is where VHF radars come into picture.

Another challenge with stealth aircraft is maintaining track/lock at distance when guiding BVRs. Tactics for defending against <= 4.5 gen fighters can not be applied 1-to-1 for stealth fighters.

Your theory with mathematics that stealth fighter will detect first the 4.5 aircraft does not make sense. Review it again.

The PL-15 missile is a long range missile for distance. It is not a proximity missile for shorter distance when the stealth fighter comes in the vicinity. It is the short range missile with proximity fuse will destroy the stealth fighter first.

You are right that Rafale will shoot first. So will the Su-30Mki upgraded.

 

[liberalredditor]

Your theory with mathematics that stealth fighter will detect first the 4.5 aircraft does not make sense. Review it again.

Basic theory is that su30mki being a huge aircraft with metal surface is upwards of 15m2 rcs. It's logical that j35/j20 would detect it first.

 

[shade2]

LM will have capacity of 48 F-16 by 2026 apparently.


View: https://x.com/AirPowerNEW1/status/1947601865924825208

With rumors of MRFA again let's hope that our Govt doesn't cave in to US pressure, Production rate of 48 planes will surely be used as a figleaf excuse to push in the F16

 

[officewarrior]

Heard of rafale with spectra war mode? Eurofighters could see the rafale in sky but in radar nothing was visible. This is the info out in public. Many say spectra war mode can pretty much make an a2a missile go mad and just become a piece of junk

So no need to dhoti shiver, wait for tejas mk2 or repeat order of rafale

Only heard of no proof of.
Its a generation gap between both platforms stealth shape bhi koi cheez hoti hai.
Think logically suni sunayi bato pe vishvas mat kro.
And dhoti shivering ke naam ka churan yha mt felao koi proof ya logical answer ho to do.

 

[Nutcracker]

Heard of rafale with spectra war mode? Eurofighters could see the rafale in sky but in radar nothing was visible. This is the info out in public. Many say spectra war mode can pretty much make an a2a missile go mad and just become a piece of junk

So no need to dhoti shiver, wait for tejas mk2 or repeat order of rafale

Have you given a thought that Eurodoggy did not have AESA radar till few months back, hence the dog-shit performance ??

 

[liberalredditor]

@randombully piejaan will help me

 

[Hari Sud]

Basic theory is that su30mki being a huge aircraft with metal surface is upwards of 15m2 rcs. It's logical that j35/j20 would detect it first.

Does the surface size matter or the power of radar waves matter. The radar does not distinguish the size. The only thing matter is that how big is the detection size. You are right that metal surface detects easily.

In case of stealth which I do not believe that the Chinese have advanced enough to have surface coatings as good as F-22 or F-35. Chinese is all copy. When the Americans realized that they are copied, they put a stop and Chinese lost the surface copy technology.

 

[Miss Firing]

How Apache Chopper's Presence Near Pakistan Border Will Shift The Equation

15 months after a squadron was raised in Jodhpur to house the world's most feared attack helicopter, the Indian Army today took delivery of the first three of six Boeing-built AH-64E Apache helicopters.

www.ndtv.com

Fifteen months after a squadron was raised in Jodhpur to house the world's most feared attack helicopter, the Indian Army today took delivery of the first three of six Boeing-built AH-64E Apache helicopters.

**

I mean, will a squadron really make that much of a difference?

Besides aren't drones more suitable for tactical front-line air attacks these days..?

 

[Doreamon]

One of the key advantages of the Tejas Mk1A, much like the upgraded Su-30MKI, is its integration with the NETCOR datalink. In all likelihood, it will be equipped with two L-band antennas for datalink communication—one mounted above the fuselage and the other beneath the belly.

The upper fuselage antenna is expected to facilitate connectivity with AEW&CS platforms and other fighter aircraft, enabling cooperative engagement and enhanced situational awareness. The lower antenna will likely serve as the interface with ground-based IACCS (Integrated Air Command and Control System) nodes, providing the aircraft with a ASP-picture derived from ground-based radars.



View: https://x.com/arpitkanodia30/status/1947506810094588202

 

[shade2]

One of the key advantages of the Tejas Mk1A, much like the upgraded Su-30MKI, is its integration with the NETCOR datalink. In all likelihood, it will be equipped with two L-band antennas for datalink communication—one mounted above the fuselage and the other beneath the belly.

The upper fuselage antenna is expected to facilitate connectivity with AEW&CS platforms and other fighter aircraft, enabling cooperative engagement and enhanced situational awareness. The lower antenna will likely serve as the interface with ground-based IACCS (Integrated Air Command and Control System) nodes, providing the aircraft with a ASP-picture derived from ground-based radars.



View: https://x.com/arpitkanodia30/status/1947506810094588202

Deets about this NETCOR integration on Su-30 upgrade program


View: https://x.com/arpitkanodia30/status/1930581742127292710