Indian Air Force: News & Discussions

Americans are trialing chemical laser pods with twin seater F-15s
1732046112883.webp
1732046239584.webp
 
In theory we can acquire up to 12 squadrons from France + UAE + Greece but that requires France to get rid of almost all their mirages. Which barring economic collapse, they won't.
Realistically, we can acquire 1 to 1.5 squadrons from France, their oldest batch of mirage-2000 that they decided not to upgrade to the F5 standard ( latest standard), along with approx 2 squadrons from UAE and 1 from Greece. Though UAE number is at best going to be 1 squadron because i read somewhere recently that they are selling 1 squadron to Morocco.

Nobody is gonna 'throw in' Mirage-2000 as a sweetener deal, especially because Mirage-2000 is STILL one of the best bang for your buck plane in the world today - it has exceptionally low maintaiance costs ( fyi i know from IAF insiders that 1 Mig-29 = 3 Mirage-2000 in upkeep cost), is a heavy payload delivery single seater and has always lived up in tough, hardy conditions better than an F16 has.

Its basically your reliable trusty ambassador taxi that no one wants to get rid of because it is so damn reliable and cheap to maintain.
So the only acquisition pathway, is through nations that are slated to phase them out due to more modern acquisitions. Such as Greece and UAE getting more F-35s/Rafales and de-comissioning their Mirage-2000s.

France doesn't wanna give us a lot of their mirage-2000 basically because Dassault is worried that if we take too much Mirage-2000, then our Rafale orders will only be the M version for the navy and that means only 40-50 birds at max.
But i suspect that if India does order another 70+ Rafales (which is likely - the rumour is that India is gonna activate its option of another 36 from the original order option and order another 40-odd M variant for the navy), then Dassault will drop its objection to the French Air Force selling us a few more squadrons of Mirage-2000s.

I suspect actually that if things work out, India will keep the Mirage-2000 flying well into the 2040s, because of new emergent low intensity threats in our region : from Myanmar being a civil war zone to Bangladesh going kanglu-way.
These are bringing up scenarios of potential conflict where you need amriki style 'bomb the rag tag barbarians from the air because their best air defence is an assault rifle' and this is where a hardy, high lift, low maintainance khataara ( which the Mirage-2000 isnt today, but will be by late 2030s) is the ideal tool and doesnt require exposure of the much more expensive to maintain and fly Rafale/Tejas/MKI.
If In 2028 IAF had

+ 2-3 squadrons Mirage 2000
+ 3-4 squadrons Tejas Mk1A
- 2 squadrons MiG-21

Any need for MRFA?
 
If In 2028 IAF had

+ 2-3 squadrons Mirage 2000
+ 3-4 squadrons Tejas Mk1A
- 2 squadrons MiG-21

Any need for MRFA?
Yes. we need MRFA/ORCA/TBDF/AMCA to keep our air force modernised.
The mirage+tejas are supposed to fill in the already existing shortfall from 42 min squadrons. Remember, our squadrons are also smaller than the western/russian squadrons, who have 24 planes per squadron, while we have 18.
The primary function of Mirage + tejas is to be point defence and low intensity warfare : they are to bomb rag tag rebels and engage in air combat over friendly airspace meaning our own.
The Su30 + all the above options are for air dominance, aka fight over enemy airspace. So that requirement will remain regardless of how many point defence fighters we acquire.
 
Yes. we need MRFA/ORCA/TBDF/AMCA to keep our air force modernised.
The mirage+tejas are supposed to fill in the already existing shortfall from 42 min squadrons. Remember, our squadrons are also smaller than the western/russian squadrons, who have 24 planes per squadron, while we have 18.
The primary function of Mirage + tejas is to be point defence and low intensity warfare : they are to bomb rag tag rebels and engage in air combat over friendly airspace meaning our own.
The Su30 + all the above options are for air dominance, aka fight over enemy airspace. So that requirement will remain regardless of how many point defence fighters we acquire.
Gauda ji, there is nothing called as a point defence, over friendly sir space and over enemy airspace.

Tejas will be more useful to strike in so called enemy airspace then SU-30mki, giving it small size and low IR Signature.

Our enemy don't lie in Europe or Africa. They just inch away from us. So fancy classification of light, medium and heavy aircraft is flawed. Light and heavy aircrafts alone enough.

Take Ukraine as an example. Tejas will work in the same way as F-15 or Su-30mki in Ukrainian airspace except later have advantage delivering cruise missiles.
 
Gauda ji, there is nothing called as a point defence, over friendly sir space and over enemy airspace.

Tejas will be more useful to strike in so called enemy airspace then SU-30mki, giving it small size and low IR Signature.

Our enemy don't lie in Europe or Africa. They just inch away from us. So fancy classification of light, medium and heavy aircraft is flawed. Light and heavy aircrafts alone enough.

Take Ukraine as an example. Tejas will work in the same way as F-15 or Su-30mki in Ukrainian airspace except later have advantage delivering cruise missiles.
There most definitely is point defence vs fighting over enemy airspace - this is factored by whether you are under your own radar + AA coverage or not. The mission profile of Tejas isnt to carry out strikes inside China, its to intercept Chinese fighters over indian air space.
Its the same reason MiG-21s were not used for balakot ( it has to go over enemy airspace) but were deployed during defense of Jammu - as its over friendly airspace. The tejas is supposed to fill in the mission profile for MiG-21. Hence its likely to be deployed as a point defence fighter when deployed exclusively - at best it can be mixed in with some Su or Rafale strike missions to mitigate risk to the higher value fighters.
 
Last edited:
In theory we can acquire up to 12 squadrons from France + UAE + Greece but that requires France to get rid of almost all their mirages. Which barring economic collapse, they won't.
Realistically, we can acquire 1 to 1.5 squadrons from France, their oldest batch of mirage-2000 that they decided not to upgrade to the F5 standard ( latest standard), along with approx 2 squadrons from UAE and 1 from Greece. Though UAE number is at best going to be 1 squadron because i read somewhere recently that they are selling 1 squadron to Morocco.

Nobody is gonna 'throw in' Mirage-2000 as a sweetener deal, especially because Mirage-2000 is STILL one of the best bang for your buck plane in the world today - it has exceptionally low maintaiance costs ( fyi i know from IAF insiders that 1 Mig-29 = 3 Mirage-2000 in upkeep cost), is a heavy payload delivery single seater and has always lived up in tough, hardy conditions better than an F16 has.

Its basically your reliable trusty ambassador taxi that no one wants to get rid of because it is so damn reliable and cheap to maintain.
So the only acquisition pathway, is through nations that are slated to phase them out due to more modern acquisitions. Such as Greece and UAE getting more F-35s/Rafales and de-comissioning their Mirage-2000s.

France doesn't wanna give us a lot of their mirage-2000 basically because Dassault is worried that if we take too much Mirage-2000, then our Rafale orders will only be the M version for the navy and that means only 40-50 birds at max.
But i suspect that if India does order another 70+ Rafales (which is likely - the rumour is that India is gonna activate its option of another 36 from the original order option and order another 40-odd M variant for the navy), then Dassault will drop its objection to the French Air Force selling us a few more squadrons of Mirage-2000s.

I suspect actually that if things work out, India will keep the Mirage-2000 flying well into the 2040s, because of new emergent low intensity threats in our region : from Myanmar being a civil war zone to Bangladesh going kanglu-way.
These are bringing up scenarios of potential conflict where you need amriki style 'bomb the rag tag barbarians from the air because their best air defence is an assault rifle' and this is where a hardy, high lift, low maintainance khataara ( which the Mirage-2000 isnt today, but will be by late 2030s) is the ideal tool and doesnt require exposure of the much more expensive to maintain and fly Rafale/Tejas/MKI.

There was need reports in 2021 that India has already signed a deal for 24 Mirages of unknown age with 8 in flyaway condition (the rest have ejection seats removed).

This June it was reported we'll be getting 2nd hand operational Mirages from Qatar.
 
There was need reports in 2021 that India has already signed a deal for 24 Mirages of unknown age with 8 in flyaway condition (the rest have ejection seats removed).

This June it was reported we'll be getting 2nd hand operational Mirages from Qatar.
yes, the first one is from france. They have like 120+ mirage 2000s, some of them too shitty for us to even want, which we took for parts.
Remember, mirage-2000 is a scavenger hunt, coz production has stopped for all parts & components. You may be able to repair things or service things better at a plant, but at the end of the day, critical parts failure will only be replaced by scavenging.
So we took a bunch of French khataaras that they were gonna chuck out ( not even give to ukraine coz it will be like shooting gallery for russians ) for parts but we got 8 flyaway ones, meaning probably their 2000C variant, whichis significantly worse than our 2000H variants.
Remember, Mirage too, is like the F16 ( the mirage is literally supposed to be the delta wing variant competitor of the F16 and that was also the original intent of its launch) and has several blocks and some are far better than the others.

For the qatari ones, i am not aware, nor do i think its likely because as far as i know, qatar has already decomissioned its mirage-2000 fleet.
Once fleets get decomissioned, they rarely get put back into flyaway conditions but it was not that long ago, so who knows, a deal is still possible, but its also qatar, the rabid al jazeera monkey so i am suspicious.

UAE seems like a far better bet, especially since they WANT to get rid of their mirage-2000s and morocco i think already beat us to the punch for 1 squadron's worth.
The UAE mirage-2000s are also extremely high quality variants, since both EAD and 9s are two of the top tier variants of the mirage-2000.
 
Last edited:
Will be too overpriced, as it's coming from France. Also if we ask these at fairly low price around 300-400M for 14 airframes, Macron would rather give it to Cykraine and chest beat in his globhomo circlejerk about muh freedom and sapport as he did with 6 airframes.
Yes, Macron is virtually guaranteed to give Ukraine some, but that window is closing with Trump coming to power and if market is correct that Ukraine's odds evaporate over the next year.
But France has 300+ mirage 2000s.
They will never part with their nook delivery version ( unique to them i think) thats close to 100 of their fleet and is virtually guranteed to keep most of their D versions, which is like 50-60 of them, till they drop dead, coz they are the specialised attack (meaning A2G) version and the real backbone of France bombing people in Africa.
But this leaves about 150 other 2000s to go around, of which around 50 are the F5 standard and the rest are the lower model C version ( lower than ours) that we can do basic avionics upgrade to bring them up to snuff and the tweaks required are minor since they share the same radar and its only avionics that are slightly more primitive.

So if France wants to offload Mirage-2000s, we are a prime customer, but this would obviously mean if we want France to drop its price for Mirage-2000, we have to give them like 100 rafale for 12-13 billion to get another 50 mirages thrown in for a billion and half or so.

Our better bets are to target greece & UAE, particularly since the Mk2 version is allegedly the best variant of the mirage put out outside the french nook variant.

If we wish to keep our rafale orders small - say like 50 odd ( 36 from prior option going to navy, one more squadron for AF), we may be able to persuade them to part with 1 squadron for half a billion or so.

Again, i dont think we should swing too much in the Mirage-2000 is god camp either - the whole idea of mirage-2000 is that if persued seriously, it can show up in multiple squadron numbers in the next couple of years and last another 10-15 years before being retired. That is 2040 and we will either have independent production of our own fighters by then or be someone's bitch, making the point moot for then, but either way, the mirage's nitche is to make up falling sqaudron numbers, maybe even beef it up a bit by inducting 2-4 squadrons of it.
We can get 3 squadrons outta UAE + Greece alone and if Qatar is really gonna give us their half squadron, yay,plus another one from france and suddenly we can breathe a bit easy and not get stuck in an 'immediate high end phoren maal vs must develop local maal' anxiety loop in terms of planners and political pressures being exerted.
That i believe is a feasible goal, in terms of scoring these 70 odd mirages for around 2 billion total.
 
Last edited:
There most definitely is point defence vs fighting over enemy airspace - this is factored by whether you are under your own radar + AA coverage or not. The mission profile of Tejas isnt to carry out strikes inside China, its to intercept Chinese fighters over indian air space.
Its the same reason MiG-21s were not used for balakot ( it has to go over enemy airspace) but were deployed during defense of Jammu - as its over friendly airspace. The tejas is supposed to fill in the mission profile for MiG-21. Hence its likely to be deployed as a point defence fighter when deployed exclusively - at best it can be mixed in with some Su or Rafale strike missions to mitigate risk to the higher value fighters.

Gauda ji, Problem of this forum is people give their opinion based on Gulf war, Israeli Arab war, Libyan war where one adversary was heavily outnumbered by another.

If Chinese jets are flying in our airspace that means technically we have already lost the war. In the war there is a contact line where you all focus lies. You use missiles to target inside enemy territory.

Nobody risk a fighter jets to cross heavily armed contact line because due to countless layer of air defence.

Mig-21 was not used because it did not carry Spice-2000. Still Mirages were used over superior SU-30MKI.

Tejas can carry Spice-2000 and many other weapons. So technically it can go in Chinese airspace. Infact it has more survival chance giving it better EW capacity, Rafale is only better for now.

During Pakistani attack on Feb-2019, Mig was not sent as point defence but infact it was near to the point where attack was taken place, Hence become first responder. All other jets ( Mirage and Su-30mki) was rushing to that point as well.

Anything India buy below generation 5 aircraft, is a pure waste of money. India better build more Tejas and SU-30mki
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top