Indian Army Artillery Programme

[Bleh]

Ok, what else would you classify the following as, then??


If this ain't cope, then I don't know what is.

Yea he's not wrong ... I'm pretty sure Chinks shared the video of their most accurate strikes.

I'm also pretty sure DRDO did just once.

What I don't understand is why does 5m matter for a MLRS strike. You're not gonna be any better just because a thermobaric round didn't hit your head, even if there's a structure that isn't a reinforced bunker.

What about hitting a structure?? I guess that never crossed your mind, now did it??

We have suicide drones, glide-bombs, guided-arty a plethora of things for different ranges.


PS: Quick question, isn't MLRS really an area-saturation weapon as argued above? It's primary use is to disrupt concentrations & formations. To take out something like a bridge we'd rely on a cruise or tactical ballistic missile. The Chink MLRS is 370mm dia with a 300km range, is basically a sub-ballistic missile.
Why would we use it for strikes at only 100km ranges? Won't a gliding/rocket arty shell be cheaper?

 

[Corvus Splendens]

Yea he's not wrong ... I'm pretty sure Chinks shared the video of their most accurate strikes.

I'm also pretty sure DRDO did just once.

What I don't understand is why does 5m matter for a MLRS strike. You're not gonna be any better just because it didn't hit your head.


We have suicide drones, glide-bombs, guided-arty a plethora of things for different ranges.


PS: Quick question, isn't MLRS really an area-saturation weapon as argued above? why would we use it for strikes at 100km ranges? Won't a gliding/rocket arty shell be cheaper?

Chinese are fine with investing in long range MLRS spam (100-150km). Also what's the difference between Rocket Artillery and MLRS ? they are the same thing, do the same thing.

 

[Bleh]

Chinese are fine with investing in long range MLRS spam (100-150km). Also what's the difference between Rocket Artillery and MLRS ? they are the same thing, do the same thing.

Aren't MLRS like, 3 times costlier than arty shells?

 

[Corvus Splendens]

Aren't MLRS like, 10 times costlier than arty shells?

Powered shells from a barrel ? sure it's cheaper than rockets. But it won't meet the target saturation firing rate.

 

[Bleh]

Powered shells from a barrel ? sure it's cheaper than rockets. But it won't meet the target saturation firing rate.

MLRS allows rapid saturated strikes, but why not just send 20 drones, saturation attacks by then are happening elsewhere in the world?.. They'll have same range, must cheaper at fuel, a TV terminal-guided one will be harder to jam than GPS/INS.

MLRS may be a bit dated. Plus we now have gliding-arty shells that adds a fuckload more range without need to rocket (gliding is really a revolutionary tech for bombs & shells). It'll do a 100-150km hit much cheaper.
Fits in regular barrel, with rear attachment so no payload compromise.

 

[Corvus Splendens]

MLRS allows rapid saturated strikes, but why not just send 20 drones, saturation attacks by then are happening elsewhere in the world?.. They'll have same range, must cheaper at fuel, a TV terminal-guided one will be harder to jam than GPS/INS.

MLRS may be a bit dated. Plus we now have gliding-arty shells that adds a fuckload more range without need to rocket (gliding is really a revolutionary tech for bombs & shells). It'll do a 100-150km hit much cheaper.View attachment 16584
Fits in regular barrel, with rear attachment so no payload compromise.
View attachment 16585

Rate of Fire. MLRS is still unmatched in this regard no matter how far technology goes. Neither the gliding shell nor the drone will match a rocket in speed. You use these when you are cherry picking targets, gliding shells for static, drones for mobile.

 

[Bleh]

Hmm... and to whom do I owe my thanks and regards for this gem of a totally non-biased not one sided and thoughtful 'advice'??

Yourself i suppose

 

[Blood+]

Yourself i suppose

How so?? I'm not the one who issued the advice, now am I??