Indian Economy


Haier, Cheenq white-goods company, now looking for Deshi suit-boot to 49% itself, possibly to avoid the Govt danda on it's yellow bottoms.

Perhaps the Cheenq dream is this suit-boot must only be a "sleeping partner" and not one day start their own, seperate venture with 1:1 products and technology, as is Chinese culture since Ancient Times
Fault lies with our dhoti & baboo xutias for not binding these cos in a JV since the beginning or at least since Galwan when they had the chance.

With the result they strut around here whereas the rare Indian co there has a million constraints.
 
Fault lies with our dhoti & baboo xutias for not binding these cos in a JV since the beginning or at least since Galwan when they had the chance.

With the result they strut around here whereas the rare Indian co there has a million constraints.

Treacherous baboons under the guise of (((liberalisation))) zeitgeist and (((free trade))) chutiyapa have allowed this to transpire.
Don't see them so lax with al-Bakstani companies now do they?
 
Fault lies with our dhoti & baboo xutias for not binding these cos in a JV since the beginning or at least since Galwan when they had the chance.

With the result they strut around here whereas the rare Indian co there has a million constraints.
Since when did our own baniya babus have intent to absorb that technology?
 

View: https://youtu.be/53hTRNvVPMQ?si=qZL9iiKTTDnuyVDl

Meanwhile this happened. Apparently GoI is following the worldwide trend of allocating spectrum for satellites as opposed to auctioning them which is what foreign service providers like Starlink & Amazon were advocating contrary to Airtel & Jio who were asking for an auction.

Why is this the case ? Can anybody with more knowledge on the subject matter throw light on this move for the benefit of us plebians ?

Maybe to lit fire under Dhandhomaxxers ass.

Possible.

Or mudi was a NWO stooge all along.
 
Maybe to lit fire under Dhandhomaxxers ass.

Possible.

Or mudi was a NWO stooge all along.
Wait what? Isn't it reverse like only Dhandhomaxxers would refuse Auction since Muskrat would bring big bank balance isn't it? By advocating for allocation isn't it easier for them to do profitmaxxing?
 

Some random no name ODM called EPACK has been contracted by (((HiSense))) to build ACs and other white goods for them

It is good if Cheenq and other country big-brand MNCs give our OEM/ODMs their dhandho instead of import-import
 
I found this very interesting.



I guess that 👆is related to this 👇





The article is old by 4 years and Jain left Xiaomi a year back. He is working in some UAE based Firm.
 

View: https://youtu.be/53hTRNvVPMQ?si=qZL9iiKTTDnuyVDl

Meanwhile this happened. Apparently GoI is following the worldwide trend of allocating spectrum for satellites as opposed to auctioning them which is what foreign service providers like Starlink & Amazon were advocating contrary to Airtel & Jio who were asking for an auction.

Why is this the case ? Can anybody with more knowledge on the subject matter throw light on this move for the benefit of us plebians ?


First, It is important to understand the key difference between spectrum for terrestrial networks and satellite communication and why the distinction between allocation and auctioning arises in the first place.

For terrestrial mobile services, spectrum is exclusive and is managed only by a single mobile operator in a given geographical area; therefore, this cannot be shared between or amongst operators.

In the case of satellites, the same spectrum is non-exclusive in nature and can be used by multiple satellite operators to serve the same geographical area.

The general trend, therefore, is to allocate satellite spectrum administratively.

A few countries, such as the United States, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia, have held auctions for frequency spectrum in the past. The US and Brazil conducted an auction of satellite spectrum along with orbital slots. Both countries have since reverted to administrative assignments after finding the auction process infeasible.

Like, for example, the US last conducted an auction for satellite spectrum in 2004 for three domestic orbital slots for broadcasting services. The annual regulatory fee for VSAT and equivalent C-Band antennas operating in the 12 GHz and 14 GHz frequencies is $595 per licence or authorisation.

Brazil too amended its regulatory framework in 2020 to replace satellite auctions with administrative licensing.

Though satellite landing rights are assigned through bidding in the country, the spectrum to be used for satellite services is not auctioned separately.

Recently, Saudi Arabia conducted a spectrum auction in the S-band, which ranges from 2 GHz to 4 GHz and is used for mobile satellite services (MSS) as well as weather and air traffic control applications.

The technical characteristics of the S-band are such that it is assigned on an exclusive basis for MSS; auction can, therefore, be conducted in a manner similar to the spectrum auction for terrestrial mobile services.
 
India's GDP this year will be $3.88 trillion as per IMF and all visible trends. Sanyals and all prematurely claimed $4 trillion for 2024 lmao.
 
The article is old by 4 years and Jain left Xiaomi a year back. He is working in some UAE based Firm.
So ? Does that absolve him of the financial irregularities committed by Xiaomi when he headed it ?
 
First, It is important to understand the key difference between spectrum for terrestrial networks and satellite communication and why the distinction between allocation and auctioning arises in the first place.

For terrestrial mobile services, spectrum is exclusive and is managed only by a single mobile operator in a given geographical area; therefore, this cannot be shared between or amongst operators.

In the case of satellites, the same spectrum is non-exclusive in nature and can be used by multiple satellite operators to serve the same geographical area.

The general trend, therefore, is to allocate satellite spectrum administratively.

A few countries, such as the United States, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia, have held auctions for frequency spectrum in the past. The US and Brazil conducted an auction of satellite spectrum along with orbital slots. Both countries have since reverted to administrative assignments after finding the auction process infeasible.

Like, for example, the US last conducted an auction for satellite spectrum in 2004 for three domestic orbital slots for broadcasting services. The annual regulatory fee for VSAT and equivalent C-Band antennas operating in the 12 GHz and 14 GHz frequencies is $595 per licence or authorisation.

Brazil too amended its regulatory framework in 2020 to replace satellite auctions with administrative licensing.

Though satellite landing rights are assigned through bidding in the country, the spectrum to be used for satellite services is not auctioned separately.

Recently, Saudi Arabia conducted a spectrum auction in the S-band, which ranges from 2 GHz to 4 GHz and is used for mobile satellite services (MSS) as well as weather and air traffic control applications.

The technical characteristics of the S-band are such that it is assigned on an exclusive basis for MSS; auction can, therefore, be conducted in a manner similar to the spectrum auction for terrestrial mobile services.
Thanks for the explanation. Much appreciated.
 
Gobiji has cursed the GDP by doing the $4 Trillion and $5 trillion by 202X jhumlas.
Failure in being export competitive. These things should've been done long ago, priest king can't do much.
On the flip side, IMF increased India's GDP to $16 trillion in 2024 from $14.6 trillion projected earlier for 2024 in PPP.
 

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top