- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 1,013
- Likes
- 6,247
Sorry
It's just square meter per missile. No matter you quad pack or what, it's just this formula. So forPacking density
- Mk-41; (3.4*2.5)m²/8 = 1.06m² per missile
- Sylver; (2.6*2.3)m²/8 = 0.75m² per missile
- Mk-41 quad packed; (3.4*2.5)m²/(4*8) = 0.26m² per missile
Now you can elaborate each points like how ESSM is way smaller than a Tomahawk. Or how a single cell of Sylver is small than Mk-41s. But over-all this is what packing density is, the lesser space something occupies the more efficient it's considered. And it's not just related to Navy or VLS, it's applicable everywhere; like how F-22 is able to cram 6x AAMs in a space not very big than AMCA's where we can only carry 4x.
So apparantly you also got the recipe of Binayak Sir's drink. NiceHere's a fun idea, TEDBF's front fuselage, canards and nose, chop em off and stick a Su-57's rear fuselage + engine arrangement plus wings.
For ground attack it definitely uses top attack because how else can you attack the poor ground? Can't fly parallel to itBrahMos uses top attack during terminal phase like a Javelin ATGM IIRC.
But I haven't seen anything about top attack against warships, it's going to expose the missile for bit too long. Moreover in almost all the test footages the entry hole of BrahMos is pretty low, parallel to the waterline.
After a certain point only Kusha and VL-SRSAM would be there on our ships.They should get working on this
Shtil-1 would soon get replaced because I assume these Talwars are going to be the last of the Soviet designed ships in IN service and as every single missile needs to be imported, it's better to just get something indigenous.
Barak-8 would get replaced because one, it's a rather expensive missile for what it does and second, there's no export prospect for it. Because in international market we'd be competing with IAI's Barak-MX systems.
The problem is number of VLS.This will give us an ASROC capability of sorts.
For 7x P-15s it's Okay-ish, but for 20 ships (Shivalik, Talwar, Nilgiri) you've got just 8 cells. In 8, how many are going to be AShM and how many ASuW?
Instead of further complicating logistics by two different VLS it's just better to have something in between like say a 30" cell that can do the job of both without much compromise.one for Destroyers and another for Frigates
And in case some ships need huge missiles like ASh-BM or ASAT missile then use the mid-ship space to laterally mount extendable launcher like you'd find on trucks that extend before firing. This would be a modular thing that can be easily added using just a crane.
This idea may feel weird but don't worry, it's an Indian problem. We're conditioned from childhood that anything innovative is weird and "if someone has not done this then it can't be done".
By the way, here's a future Korean ship using the exact same principle that I've described multiple times on this forum