- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 195
- Likes
- 691
when it comes to IR, it's not just about speed, it's also about density and congestion. so adding tracks at high density routes is also one of the things being done.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...k-seven-busy-routes/articleshow/104766737.cms
and this is not a new plan, below is an old response in LS.
https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/660711/1/15269.pdf
in practical terms, the solutions looks like this from gormint policy side.
View: https://youtu.be/Gk_FhUkbJzE
and since these is no feedback loop in public discourse, pretty sure no one will bother to check the impact a few years later, after these projects get completed.
What railway is doing is doubling/ quadrupling the legacy alignment or upgrading tracks to 130 kmph from 110 kmph. Railway has to ditch the idea of using the legacy circuitous alignments which has curves and gradients passing through major towns for speed travel and build geeenfield express alignment like NHAI’s National expressways for faster connectivity between two metropolitan cities bypassing tier 2 cities. Mumbai - Delhi - Kolkata - Chennai - Bengaluru - Mumbai express corridor at max speed 250 kmph and avg speed of 220 kmph will de congest a lot of traffic from existing infrastructure. Even bullet train being built has two many stops between Mumbai and Ahmedabad. Bullet train would be to expensive to afford for majority of citizens and we have to build an affordable semi high speed corridor to rely on. The existing 130-160 kmph infrastructure can cater to large extent of population covering major towns and then the greenfield corridor for faster transportation.
Last edited: