Indian Special Forces

Alby said:
Its not only Sikhs who glorifies themselves of their martial race.Jats Rajputs all call themselves martial race .But kill ratios of them in battles from historical era doesn’t backs it up😂. I know many of you guys will be furious but its the fact.There is nothing like martial race,Gorkhas Sikhs Jats Rajputs all had their fare share of defeats.
Despite getting freedom in 1947 we are still believing in martial race theory and superiority of us over Chinese and believes china still uses Human wave tactics using peasants armed with SKS
Click to expand...
Well Kasab was caught by an Police Constable who is not belongs to any famed martial race. It is just people stepping up and protecting the country.


Jedi Operator said:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKLlXe5zJqA

This is goated
Click to expand...

Well Well Well. At max we are seeing stacked soldiers with guns on each other shoulders.


Zoid Raptor said:
GoI/MoD isn't really bold enough to undertake an op on the lines of NATO countries where we enter deep into enemy territory to take down a HVT or rescue a critical asset. Our so called "surgical strikes" which GoI gloats about for instance are no different to the BAT raids but PA/SSG/ISI have been doing since decades. We don't have it in us to take the fight to them, use our SOF units to constantly engage and take down terrorist hubs and training camps along the LoC which'll instill fear

MARCOS are the closest to what a modern day SOF unit is but their exposure to active conflict is limited. They're still trying their best by deploying in every pirate op they can get their hands on. I'm sure IA is way too egoistic to involve MARCOS in CI/CT ops while Garuds oth don't even know what their mandate is

The only active encounters we have are in Kashmir and NE...and I feel it's ok to deploy Para SF in ops where we actually need to hunt em down in the deep jungles while terrorists holed up in a house or any urban building should be taken care of by RR & JKP SOG to ensure they're constantly exposed and acclimated to active conflict instead of being underused like Chinese SOF where most operators might not see any real engagements in their tenure. On a similar note, Turks constantly use their Army and Navy SOF on a regular basis to deal with the Kurds and other adversaries in the region
Click to expand...

The entire Myanmar area near our Border is an hotpot of various unwanted factions. I believe there may be some US Operatives supporting their christ bros. If we are serious at present there should be some Special ops team working and eliminating targets who are nuisance to us.
 
Zoid Raptor said:
GoI/MoD isn't really bold enough to undertake an op on the lines of NATO countries where we enter deep into enemy territory to take down a HVT or rescue a critical asset.
Click to expand...

If the adversary knows about the critical asset and its location, then I think SF can't recover him, no matter how good is SF. SF may be asked to capture 2-3 of their valuable assets in tit for tat. That can be done, but again you need high tech SF for this along with full intel support.
 
SFF & GARUDs
GY4haeRXUAAZuFe


View: https://x.com/HQ_IDS_India/status/1841446044233556363
 
ArjunMK1A said:
supporting their christ bros. If we are serious at present there should be some Special ops team working and eliminating targets who are nuisance to us.
Click to expand...
There’s plenty of avenues tbh. An op like Zara-e-azb to wipe down the militancy & separatist movements in NE (Myanmar ain’t gonna do jack if we enter deep into their territories) and decimate the naxal corridors in Central India by using infantry, SOF, limited air power like gunships is very much possible but we’d like to keep the conflict going and stick to reactionary measures
 
COLDHEARTED AVIATOR said:
To be honest if we captured 10 kms of land ahead of LOC and created another 5 kms ahead of no mans land with constant arty shelling there is nothing Pakis could do..not even use nukes.

We could have bled them as they are bhikhari.

But either Modi has done some stupid deal with Rawalpindi or Modi has turned coward.
Click to expand...
Idk what has changed but this was the norm in the 80s and 90s. Numerous skirmished which resorted to pak losing kms of land.
COLDHEARTED AVIATOR said:
Some Jai ho gang member posted this in Reddit thinking Gora sahab will join his gang and say they are well equipped.




View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/s/o9ytpKjWmV
Click to expand...

American SF units were NOT equipped like that in the 1980s😂😂🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
 
Jedi Operator said:
watch that Turkic invasions series with Kushal Mehra and Abhijit Mitra
We make the same mistakes today....a good fighter is the one who leverages his strength over weaknesses in combat...for us, our stupid shit got us into being defeated. Just watch this, it's good, it's something I watched back in lockdown and that got me introduced to these two, I might not agree with everything they say but their anthropological approach...this deserves a book or documentary of it's own
Click to expand...
Laughing at these modern day indian Pseudo historians. No amount of “offensive mentality” would have given them horse quality of central asians.
 
KumaoniReborn said:
Laughing at these modern day indian Pseudo historians. No amount of “offensive mentality” would have given them horse quality of central asians.
Click to expand...
That "modern day indian pseudo historian" has said the exact same thing boss. India never produced good horse breeds our land was not suitable for that. Even cattle is sacred in India for the same reason that we were able to be depended on them for field work also because we did not have good horses. War horse pe pura video hai inka. And the brits really focused on their strengths by forming a good infantry instead of cavalry.
 
JConline said:
Not sure what you mean by that. I know the difference between GTAC and JTAC but I thought Garuds had JTAC capabilities. Could you please elaborate?
Click to expand...
JTAC se thora different hai basically and I'm suprized actually because ...GTAC is Ground Team Air Coordinator. Both are both related to coordinating air support, but they serve different functions within operations. GTACs coordinate and manage air support for ground teams, but they don't necessarily have the authority to control or clear aircraft to release ordnance. Their role is more about communication and coordination rather than attack approval.

Garuds should have a JTAC qualification...like they do call airstrikes and stuff
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

V
Indian Hyperloop Transportation Technologies
Replies
5
Views
274
vicky
V
Suryavanshi
Member driven Indian Defence Industry data aggregation Project.
Replies
0
Views
115
Suryavanshi
Suryavanshi
Azaad
Indian Rocket Force - ( IRF ) : News & Discussions.
Replies
2
Views
429
Pundit Pikachu
P
Unknowncommando
Indian Army Snipers, Marksmen & Sharpshooters
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
COLDHEARTED AVIATOR
COLDHEARTED AVIATOR
D
Blog on Indian national security & current wars
Replies
0
Views
267
Deans_50
D

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top