- Joined
- Sep 2, 2024
- Messages
- 523
- Likes
- 1,140
In close range and extreme cqb night vision and thermals compliment each other
In long range too they compliment each other but there is a advantage to thermals
In close range and extreme cqb night vision and thermals compliment each other
In long range too they compliment each other but there is a advantage to thermals
forget that look at the flow in which they move. They are engaging targets in multiple-room scenarios which requires such a flow of shooters that it seems they are moving seamlessly through the target. They seem to have an almost Zen-like awareness of the surroundings, and are completly in sync with their weapons. Just pew pew pew....now imagine doing that in a team where everyone's held to that high standard...you succeed as an individual first and as a team laterIn close range and extreme cqb night vision and thermals compliment each other
In long range too they compliment each other but there is a advantage to thermals
really...I am not aware of that but if so...those who had this idea in the higher ranks need to drown themselves in the toiletBut he did with infantry
Quality discussions here mostly emerge when good gear is spotted in an exercise or information regarding a terrific op comes in.
Wearing something new just before the operation will definitely cause restriction in movement if not trained with it.
Kings were much much much better than any politician India has ever produced.A king that leads the vanguard truly a class apart.
Peope Like these should have been defence ministers.
Some 7 decades later we still have no people from the forces as defence minister.
Perhaps the fear of coup resides in the both sections of political spectrum.
At least kings had their skin in the game , loosing a war would mean death for them and their family.Kings were much much much better than any politician India has ever produced.
Everyone is corrupt in democracy.
Moreover one kings family cant loot a lot…look at India being plundered by every chutia party of the country.At least kings had their skin in the game , loosing a war would mean death for them and their family.
Politicians on the other hand gobble money and bounce if things get even a little ugly.
GoI/MoD isn't really bold enough to undertake an op on the lines of NATO countries where we enter deep into enemy territory to take down a HVT or rescue a critical asset. Our so called "surgical strikes" which GoI gloats about for instance are no different to the BAT raids but PA/SSG/ISI have been doing since decades. We don't have it in us to take the fight to them, use our SOF units to constantly engage and take down terrorist hubs and training camps along the LoC which'll instill fearYhi kar rkha hai 2017-18 ke baad se. Jis kaam ke liye Ghatak Platoons bnai thi woh kaam Para ko dediya hai
To be honest if we captured 10 kms of land ahead of LOC and created another 5 kms ahead of no mans land with constant arty shelling there is nothing Pakis could do..not even use nukes.GoI/MoD isn't really bold enough to undertake an op on the lines of NATO countries where we enter deep into enemy territory to take down a HVT or rescue a critical asset. Our so called "surgical strikes" which GoI gloats about for instance are no different to the BAT raids but PA/SSG/ISI has been doing the same since decades. We don't have it in us to take the fight to them, use our SOF units to constantly engage and take down terrorist hubs and training camps along the LoC which'll instill fear
MARCOS are the closest to what a modern day SOF unit is but their exposure to active conflict is limited. They're still trying their best by deploying in every pirate op they can get their hands on. I'm sure IA is way too egoistic to involve MARCOS in CI/CT ops while Garuds oth don't even know what their mandate is
The only active encounters we have are in Kashmir and NE...and I feel it's ok to deploy Para SF in ops where we actually need to hunt em down in the deep jungles while terrorists holed up in a house or any urban building should be taken care of by RR & JKP SOG to ensure they're constantly exposed and acclimated to active conflict instead of being underused like Chinese SOF where most operators might not see any real engagements in their tenure
Historically, we've been a bunch of softies. Hindu kings never went on the offensive and ended up loosing land to the Islamic hordes of Central Asia & Gulf primarily due to their defensive approach and appeasement policies and the current establishment isn't any different.To be honest if we captured 10 kms of land ahead of LOC and created another 5 kms ahead of no mans land with constant arty shelling there is nothing Pakis could do..not even use nukes.
We could have bled them as they are bhikhari.
But either Modi has done some stupid deal with Rawalpindi or Modi has turned coward.
Indian kings never had the capabilities to go on the offensiveHistorically, we've been a bunch of softies. Hindu kings never went on the offensive and ended up loosing land to the Islamic hordes of Central Asia & Gulf primarily due to their defensive approach and appeasement policies and the current establishment isn't any different.
We're ok with loosing tens of thousands of soldiers over a decade to keep the status quo intact but loosing a few hundred or couple of thousand men over a short span for strategic gains would create chaos in the masses and the possibility of their govt being toppled
Very simplified understanding of the conflict. If by “we” you mean the potbellied uncles in delhi than sure, but the young officers and brigadiers have always done sneaky operations along the LoC.GoI/MoD isn't really bold enough to undertake an op on the lines of NATO countries where we enter deep into enemy territory to take down a HVT or rescue a critical asset. Our so called "surgical strikes" which GoI gloats about for instance are no different to the BAT raids but PA/SSG/ISI have been doing since decades. We don't have it in us to take the fight to them, use our SOF units to constantly engage and take down terrorist hubs and training camps along the LoC which'll instill fear
MARCOS are the closest to what a modern day SOF unit is but their exposure to active conflict is limited. They're still trying their best by deploying in every pirate op they can get their hands on. I'm sure IA is way too egoistic to involve MARCOS in CI/CT ops while Garuds oth don't even know what their mandate is
The only active encounters we have are in Kashmir and NE...and I feel it's ok to deploy Para SF in ops where we actually need to hunt em down in the deep jungles while terrorists holed up in a house or any urban building should be taken care of by RR & JKP SOG to ensure they're constantly exposed and acclimated to active conflict instead of being underused like Chinese SOF where most operators might not see any real engagements in their tenure. On a similar note, Turks constantly use their Army and Navy SOF on a regular basis to deal with the Kurds and other adversaries in the region
Also- India as a political entity did not exist back then. And even then numerous Indian kingdoms often went on the offensive if they had the numbers and the chanceHistorically, we've been a bunch of softies. Hindu kings never went on the offensive and ended up loosing land to the Islamic hordes of Central Asia & Gulf primarily due to their defensive approach and appeasement policies and the current establishment isn't any different.
We're ok with loosing tens of thousands of soldiers over a decade to keep the status quo intact but loosing a few hundred or couple of thousand men over a short span for strategic gains would create chaos in the masses and th