Indian Special Forces

jaijaganath · 2024-10-03T23:47:33+0530

Tier 1 Patriot said:
View attachment 11082

Link send karo bhai

username unkown · 2024-10-04T00:09:47+0530

Tier 1 Patriot said:
Nhi yeh page hai

Ok bhai

JConline · 2024-10-04T02:29:13+0530

Tier 1 Patriot said:
View attachment 11082

This is quite interesting because, I was given to understand that Para SF have very few Binods, for trial purposes. But the pic looks like from an active AO. Can someone give additional context?

Nightshade1992 · 2024-10-04T08:22:43+0530

Tier 1 Patriot said:
Foreign ka mall head to toe except ak

Pant is that of Gearsmith's Crusader MK.1

GhatiyaOperator · 2024-10-04T08:31:55+0530

Nightshade1992 said:
Pant is that of Gearsmith's Crusader MK.1

Viewed the original post, I think major saab announced retirement

Mr.Evil · 2024-10-04T10:03:10+0530

Baseplate said:
View attachment 11073

Swweet minimalistic chestrig setup

View: https://x.com/KalashnikovOpe1/status/1842057507231166485

Tier 1 Patriot · 2024-10-04T10:21:00+0530

Mr.Evil said:
View: https://x.com/KalashnikovOpe1/status/1842057507231166485

Spiritus System Chest rig
Rawat Sir

Jedi Operator · 2024-10-04T10:31:22+0530

Arad Operator said:
View attachment 11063

bro the fuck ?
you litteraly went on and changed the wikipedia page for this ?
I mean how do you know their are 6 squadrons and each consist of 100 men and why is it to be put online?
Also Special Operations Capable Infantry ?? How do you know that ? Why does R&AW have to have a Special Operations Capable Infantry ? You know you've been started to talk like Pahadi Chuha and Elitepredators for quite some time. Just tells whose side you really on

Yt2211 · 2024-10-04T10:32:10+0530

Tier 1 Patriot said:
View attachment 11082

Which Nvg and mount is that?

Unknowncommando · 2024-10-04T10:35:58+0530

ECWCS

username unkown · 2024-10-04T10:42:56+0530

Jedi Operator said:
bro the fuck ?
you litteraly went on and changed the wikipedia page for this ?
I mean how do you know their are 6 squadrons and each consist of 100 men and why is it to be put online?
Also Special Operations Capable Infantry ?? How do you know that ? Why does R&AW have to have a Special Operations Capable Infantry ? You know you've been started to talk like Pahadi Chuha and Elitepredators for quite some time. Just tells whose side you really on

Whose side you really on i thought we all are on one side in this forum jedai
Angry Vader noise intensifies

TAVOUR 21 · 2024-10-04T10:54:57+0530

Jedi Operator said:
bro the fuck ?
you litteraly went on and changed the wikipedia page for this ?
I mean how do you know their are 6 squadrons and each consist of 100 men and why is it to be put online?
Also Special Operations Capable Infantry ?? How do you know that ? Why does R&AW have to have a Special Operations Capable Infantry ? You know you've been started to talk like Pahadi Chuha and Elitepredators for quite some time. Just tells whose side you really on

Not directly under R&AW

vampyrbladez · 2024-10-04T11:08:33+0530

Jedi Operator said:
bro the fuck ?
you litteraly went on and changed the wikipedia page for this ?
I mean how do you know their are 6 squadrons and each consist of 100 men and why is it to be put online?
Also Special Operations Capable Infantry ?? How do you know that ? Why does R&AW have to have a Special Operations Capable Infantry ? You know you've been started to talk like Pahadi Chuha and Elitepredators for quite some time. Just tells whose side you really on

CIA also has the Special Activities Division (SAD) which is a Special Forces (Tier 1) unit.

IWIarad11 · 2024-10-04T11:39:48+0530

Tier 1 Patriot said:
View attachment 11130
Spiritus System Chest rig
Rawat Sir

The ideal low viz setup.

Arad Operator · 2024-10-04T12:40:09+0530

vampyrbladez said:
CIA also has the Special Activities Division (SAD) which is a Special Forces (Tier 1) unit.

SG is not equivalent of CIA SAC!

Arad Operator · 2024-10-04T12:40:42+0530

TAVOUR 21 said:
Not directly under R&AW

As I have mentioned hundred of times, SG is under SFF as any regular Airborne V unit.

Arad Operator · 2024-10-04T12:42:56+0530

JConline said:
This is quite interesting because, I was given to understand that Para SF have very few Binods, for trial purposes. But the pic looks like from an active AO. Can someone give additional context?

Trial purposes? SF has Binos since 2015 AFAIK...

Jedi Operator · 2024-10-04T13:35:57+0530

username unkown said:
Whose side you really on i thought we all are on one side in this forum jedai
Angry Vader noise intensifies

Oh yeah Darth Vader listen up....I mean on the side of spreading misinformation...these things that you put on here buddy, I mean on wikipedia or some shit, you give us references to that okay. How come you know what size it is and why would you put it here ? How come you call it a special operations capable infantry ? Doesnt make any sense for SG to be just a ranger like unit, they're too small for that. But let's leave that aside. How about not using a random pinterest image and saying the it's SG and is placed in the unit wall. Like wow okay I'll buy into that but now show me a unicorn too.
You know what's the right side to go brother, research shit up, discuss it amongst, give us the sources, let us look it up and lets not be that elitepreditors guy for God's sake. This 'I know enough...trust me bro' aura leave that behind.

Jedi Operator · 2024-10-04T13:42:28+0530

vampyrbladez said:
CIA also has the Special Activities Division (SAD) which is a Special Forces (Tier 1) unit.

There's a clear distinction between something like that and when you call something as "special operations capable" it's like CIA SAD vs 75th Ranger Regiment or Marine Recons which are "special operations capable"
C'mon I get if you want to put that label on SFF but SG ? If they already had SFF why have something like SG doing the same thing then ? And you're telling me a unit which started CT in India, trained and formed SPG, NSG and stuff is "special operations capable" and not a "special forces unit" ?

username unkown · 2024-10-04T14:11:33+0530

Jedi Operator said:
Oh yeah Darth Vader listen up....I mean on the side of spreading misinformation...these things that you put on here buddy, I mean on wikipedia or some shit, you give us references to that okay. How come you know what size it is and why would you put it here ? How come you call it a special operations capable infantry ? Doesnt make any sense for SG to be just a ranger like unit, they're too small for that. But let's leave that aside. How about not using a random pinterest image and saying the it's SG and is placed in the unit wall. Like wow okay I'll buy into that but now show me a unicorn too.
You know what's the right side to go brother, research shit up, discuss it amongst, give us the sources, let us look it up and lets not be that elitepreditors guy for God's sake. This 'I know enough...trust me bro' aura leave that behind.

On point that sg is too smal to be ranger like unit i agree
I dont know about his sources and I think he shouldn't post anything about sg even if he have accurate info on it it is supposed to be secretive and no comments on that random Pinterest pic thing

But as you put it whose side are you on i like to believe reality lies btw two extremes and right now there are two extremes one grp that jai ho gang that say those unit stiched gear is operator choice and other is group who keep crying and says matter are lot worse than it seems to me both seems childish

Indian Special Forces

Full Member

Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

Certified Bullpup Hater

Member

Member

New Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Moderator

Moderator

Moderator

Member

Member

Member

Similar threads

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2