Indian Special Forces

GbjDz6UXIAA_pXH
 
Please stop using this First world and Third world analogy to somehow hint at India's lower status in terms of economy and international relations.
These phrases "First World" and "Third World" were never meant to be associated with economic prosperity. And I for one refuse to accept that India is somehow less powerful or Indians are less fortunate on the world stage cause we're a "Third World" country.
In the context of Armed Forces, India is very well a force to be reckoned with. And we can be even stronger, better equipped, more technology driven (God knows we have the intellectual faculties for that in this nation) but the problem is the lack of intent or even naivety to some extent from the paper pushers.
This is true and all but the reality is that USA has 100 times the military resources india has. In the Gulf war of 91 their satelite capabilities are what destroyed the Iraqi army in 3 days. India simply doesn’t have the capabilities to do so. We need to be more realistic in our comparisons as the USA are generations ahead of india in all special forces, organization, and equipment
 
No one bothered about that. They were bothered as how could the "bloody civilians" want the POGs to be held accountable.
I have mixed views on this.

On X there are many uninformed retards who are civilians claiming they know what is what for the armed forces.

On the other hand you have the well informed members on this thread and forum who are calling for better gear and equipment while giving constructive criticism.

Btw I haven’t seen one demeaning word towards any of the armed forces in this thread.
 
Btw I haven’t seen one demeaning word towards any of the armed forces in this thread.
Yup. Hellfire on X cherry picked a couple of posts with not so eloquent expression but barely any inflammatory language and went all in with it.
 
Yup. Hellfire on X cherry picked a couple of posts with not so eloquent expression but barely any inflammatory language and went all in with it.
We need to keep members on this forum distinct,

I too have seen many many low IQ brain dead morons who are spewing a bunch of nonsnese on twottter. It’s one thing to call for gear improvement and modernization, which is what we do here, whilst insulting the forces directly is what some Rayta wingers eeem to like to do constantly.
 
We need to keep members on this forum distinct,

I too have seen many many low IQ brain dead morons who are spewing a bunch of nonsnese on twottter. It’s one thing to call for gear improvement and modernization, which is what we do here, whilst insulting the forces directly is what some Rayta wingers eeem to like to do constantly.
Yup needs constant moderation
 
An off topic observation -


CIJWS wikipedia had a section called "Foreign participation" where it was mentioned how US Officers and Special forces have undergone courses there.

These were the full info -



However those sections have been very convinently removed. I suppose maybe cause how "third world" India can train the world's "best" western Special forces?

To Anyone who can edit wikipedia , can that information with added back, along with citation from the sources i gave?
 
This is true and all but the reality is that USA has 100 times the military resources india has. In the Gulf war of 91 their satelite capabilities are what destroyed the Iraqi army in 3 days. India simply doesn’t have the capabilities to do so. We need to be more realistic in our comparisons as the USA are generations ahead of india in all special forces, organization, and equipment
I completely agree that the USA is generations ahead of us. But I still don't think the "Third World" moniker makes sense or is a viable excuse for the state of affairs in the Indian Armed Forces. Other so-called third-world nations have done way better in keeping up with the times, and they did so with fewer resources than India has.
It just boils down to the efficiency of using these resources and where our priorities lie. And their priorities are skewed if the Army tests out jet packs and robot dogs while frontline soldiers are still equipped like they were during Kargil.
Another massive reason for this reluctance is the fact that the Indian Armed Forces rarely get involved in military unrest around the world. The USA not only has the resources but has also learned how to use them properly in real-time war scenarios. Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine. All of these military campaigns have shaped and refined the American military doctrine. India on the other hand is satisfied with kicking the ass of a military dictatorship on the brink of economic collapse. No wonder we aren't keeping up with the times. We're still basking in past glories and that has blinded us to the point that we're unable to fathom the future of warfare.
 
Last edited:
This is true and all but the reality is that USA has 100 times the military resources india has. In the Gulf war of 91 their satelite capabilities are what destroyed the Iraqi army in 3 days. India simply doesn’t have the capabilities to do so. We need to be more realistic in our comparisons as the USA are generations ahead of india in all special forces, organization, and equipment

Israel was literally able to kick the shit out of a country 1000 km away and made it so scared of attacking Israel again and cause casualties. That was with US help and technological prowess.

Indian strategic assets would be made mincemeat in hours in a conflict against US. Indian Navy would be sunken in matter of hours and Indian Air force wiped out or rendered ineffective in a week or so. It could never directly challenge USAF even over Indian skies. USAF elint capabilities are simply too overwhelming even in an expeditionary role. India is literally behind US like about 34 years. India hasn't even caught up to the 1991 Gulf War prowess level.

The country that is closest to US warfare technological capabilities is Israel, then Japan, and then maybe UK. France is behind UK.
 
Israel was literally able to kick the shit out of a country 1000 km away and made it so scared of attacking Israel again and cause casualties. That was with US help and technological prowess.

Indian strategic assets would be made mincemeat in hours in a conflict against US. Indian Navy would be sunken in matter of hours and Indian Air force wiped out or rendered ineffective in a week or so. It could never directly challenge USAF even over Indian skies. USAF elint capabilities are simply too overwhelming even in an expeditionary role. India is literally behind US like about 34 years. India hasn't even caught up to the 1991 Gulf War prowess level.

The country that is closest to US warfare technological capabilities is Israel, then Japan, and then maybe UK. France is behind UK.
Sapne suhane ladakpan ke
Man keep yapping you are doing great


I have repetadly critsized our armed forces leadership on lack of armoured veichle , indegenius weapons to mordenisation and depleting squadron but on most of what you said is same like Russian said 3 days military operation fantasy
 
On that pic i was about to say - Most Indians are devoid of humour and the banners would be lost on most.
I thought it was a snide remark by them on us , that even a dumb bimbo has NVG and comtacs while you 'sf' don't have it ....Am thinking too much...
 
Israel was literally able to kick the shit out of a country 1000 km away and made it so scared of attacking Israel again and cause casualties. That was with US help and technological prowess.

Indian strategic assets would be made mincemeat in hours in a conflict against US. Indian Navy would be sunken in matter of hours and Indian Air force wiped out or rendered ineffective in a week or so. It could never directly challenge USAF even over Indian skies. USAF elint capabilities are simply too overwhelming even in an expeditionary role. India is literally behind US like about 34 years. India hasn't even caught up to the 1991 Gulf War prowess level.

The country that is closest to US warfare technological capabilities is Israel, then Japan, and then maybe UK. France is behind UK.
This claim is hilarous. Israel hasn’t even been able to wipe out. palestine and their soldiers were getting overrun and surrendering entire bases to the jihadis lmao.
 
surrendering entire bases to the jihadis lmao.
That happened only during 7th of October when they were overrun. They got those bases back.
Israel hasn’t even been able to wipe out. palestine
You can't wipe out or end a conflict that has been going on for nearly a century. Also "Palestine" as a country does not exist. Its a fictional wet dream that was made mainstream by Jassir Arafat. So there technically is nothing to wipe out. It has now turned into an ideological warfare, and as Guy Fawkes once said- You cannot kill an idea, so it does not matter if they make Gaza a flat parking lot, they will never be able to stop the calls for FrEe PaLeStInE.
 
This claim is hilarous. Israel hasn’t even been able to wipe out. palestine and their soldiers were getting overrun and surrendering entire bases to the jihadis lmao.

They took out Iran's air defenses and left Iran vulnerable. They are able to attack Iran anytime they want to. Iran has not even dare to respond. They fired hundreds of missiles and what did they accomplish? The death of a Palestinian bystander and nothing else whereas Israel took out key strategic assets of Iran.
 
They took out Iran's air defenses and left Iran vulnerable. They are able to attack Iran anytime they want to. Iran has not even dare to respond. They fired hundreds of missiles and what did they accomplish? The death of a Palestinian bystander and nothing else whereas Israel took out key strategic assets of Iran.
If this was the case, why hasn’t Israel attacked Iran?
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top