Hello Print Bhaiya, softie editorials bhi tum likho aur softie hone ka feedback tum hi lekar aao. Chit bhi tumhari pat bhi tumhari"Discussions within Chinese media often exhibit an air of arrogance regarding India’s potential as a manufacturing alternative to China. Analysts remain sceptical about India’s ability to serve as a viable substitute in the economic sphere. Many argue that India will struggle to surpass China or replicate its achievements over the past three decades within a similar timeframe, citing significant challenges in advancing its manufacturing capabilities."
"Chinese analysts observe that Indian media increasingly reflects optimism about Sino-Indian negotiations, likely influenced by India’s current economic situation. The discourse is stuck between the idea that India will never be able to catch up with China and the belief that China should not help its adversary’s rise."
"While Beijing has long urged New Delhi to focus on issues beyond the border dispute, the current narrative suggesting consistent disengagement by China—while portraying India as eager to adjust its stance for commercial interests—appears disingenuous. This effort seems designed to distract from underlying issues and points of contention, while also fostering a false narrative that India is going soft on China."
Chinese are seeing India as going soft. Talk of ‘consensus’ over disengagement rings hollow
A review of Chinese media and social platforms reveals a widespread perception that India has adopted a more conciliatory approach towards China.theprint.in
Why's this important ? China's not yet fully through with it's theatre-ization of its armed forces command structure & its modernization program which is due to be accomplished by 2027-28. Add a year or 2 as buffer . Also watch out for the deterioration in trade ties between China & the west .
It's not armed forces reorganization my dude, it's economic reorganization, 11, Jinping bandies this term about called "dual circulation", he gives a jhumla explanation to suit-boot whitey simps
But the true explanation is he wants to turn China into a consumption based economy and not export based economy, so when he decides to do Ghar Wapsi of Taiwan, any sanctions of the West have minimal impact on the rozi-rotirice of his subjects.
It remains to see how the West handles this, they are shifting assembly of products outside China but subcomponents are still produced within China, unless the supply chain is Cheen-mukt both sides can't do what they want to.
I think this will take another 10 years, perhaps that is why we have the Russia-Ukraine war , they need to vassalize Russia so they can have some of those NATO bases on China's northern border also.
Beggars cant be choosers.It's not armed forces reorganization my dude, it's economic reorganization, 11, Jinping bandies this term about called "dual circulation", he gives a jhumla explanation to suit-boot whitey simps
But the true explanation is he wants to turn China into a consumption based economy and not export based economy, so when he decides to do Ghar Wapsi of Taiwan, any sanctions of the West have minimal impact on the rozi-rotirice of his subjects.
It remains to see how the West handles this, they are shifting assembly of products outside China but subcomponents are still produced within China, unless the supply chain is Cheen-mukt both sides can't do what they want to.
I think this will take another 10 years, perhaps that is why we have the Russia-Ukraine war , they need to vassalize Russia so they can have some of those NATO bases on China's northern border also.
Beggars cant be choosers.
West has no option BUT to deal with the greatest industrial manufacturing power ever seen in human history.
West can try to diversify to other locations out of China but will never be free of China as its main importer because China has massive overcapacity in industrial goods production. Besides, as data shows, China has more or less shrugged off their embargoes from the west and made up its western trade loss with the global south markets.
One thing is clear- West has been consistently wrong about its predictions about China for 40 years and counting. In 80s they believed that economic liberalization will bring political liberalization: WRONG.
In early 2000s they believed that China will remain a ' small household goods manufacturer and will never move to heavy industries'. WRONG
Now the western thinking is 'China will be crushed by economic choking and demographic collapse'.
I see no reason to 'trust' such a prediction, from the people who are batting at 0 wins and all wrong answers for 40 years straight.