- Joined
- Jul 7, 2024
- Messages
- 122
- Likes
- 409
They can now use it to steam dumplings!they forgot to close both the hatches ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can now use it to steam dumplings!they forgot to close both the hatches ?
illiterate or bikau darukhor traitor Jurnail should be court martialled. 7 percent is real growth. Nominal growth is 11 % means we will become 40+T$ economy with that pace. China and US can be around 60.Interesting lines by the ex PVSM, AVSM (R) Genrail Panag -
View attachment 10503
View attachment 10504
I wonder why the CCP generails did not just waltz into Tawang/AP or other areas & settle everything forever.
"Despite pressure from industry groups to explore openings for trade and investment with China, the Indian security establishment is unlikely to alter the status quo soon."Some want to kiss and make up with the cheeni
.they are the ones (among many others) blocking Indian unsc permanent seat ,nsg membership
.propping up Pakistan militarily
.interfering in traditional Indian sphere of influence in the neighborhood
.blocking access to Kailash Mansarovar
.salami slicing border regions
.claiming populated Indian territories
Russia arms China heavily, US and west provides China with Industrial know how.
So we are on our own , all talk of 75% solution and turning the page is succumbing to baniyagiri (business aka trade) so that screwdrivergiri can continue and flourish.
Chinka rubber stamping Whap like armoured vehicles... meanwhile IA gernails - "Whap still needs to complete lunar trials, let's order a dozen strykers to fill in the gap, and later maybe a dozen Whaps to keep both parties happy". As if a dozen vehicles will make any difference to the 1500 vehicles chinka will mass produce every year !
IA should ask for rights to patrol PLA's mom's bald pu$$y"Chinese negotiators have suggested to New Delhi that their troops be allowed to patrol in two sensitive areas along Arunachal Pradesh.
The two spots — one in the Yangtse area north-east of Tawang, where the two sides had a deadly clash in December 2022, and the second in central Arunachal along the Subansiri river valley — have been firmly under Indian control for decades."
The Tribune Exclusive: Chinese seek ‘unreasonable’ patrolling rights at two LAC spots along Arunachal Pradesh - The Tribune
Yangtse area & Subansiri valley sites firmly under Indian control for decades.www.tribuneindia.com
at galwan we had tents/posts ahead of pp14 , LAC at galwan was close to chinese end of buffer zone ,not at pp14 , most of buffer zone is on our side
want proof ?
early april - why is ia blocking chinese border guards 1km from pp14 ?
because this was the LAC
View: https://x.com/Mukambo1987/status/1479806595794046977
nope , those hobos are backed by PLA , they are using tibetans to hold the land . why do u think we are begging them in talks to leave ?
where was LAC in depsang ?
read this news article and what parliamentary committee had to say
"Defence Secretary Shashi Kant Sharma and senior defence ministry officials appeared before a parliamentary committee to give details of the incursion."
"They told the panel that Chinese troops had intruded 19 km deep inside Indian territory in Depsang in Ladakh region and pitched tents. They also said that efforts are underway to ensure that the status quo is maintained, informed sources said."
2013 intrusion at raki was 19km inside India , where does that put the LAC ?
depsang bulge used ot be at worst a grey zone patrolled by both sides , now its under control of PLA .
we had a old dock with boats at f2 , boats were removed before disengagement . and never came back
View attachment 10512
View attachment 10513
china's new nuclear sub sank with nuclear fuel
lifted off sea bed with cranes .
View attachment 10529
suck commie dick ? naah its truth .
at galwan we had tents/posts ahead of pp14 , LAC at galwan was close to chinese end of buffer zone ,not at pp14 , most of buffer zone is on our side
want proof ?
early april - why is ia blocking chinese border guards 1km from pp14 ?
because this was the LAC
View: https://x.com/Mukambo1987/status/1479806595794046977
Chinese didn't cross shit. Some hobo nomads crossed the LAC and settled like 100 meters on our side. Ladakh police can kick them out.
nope , those hobos are backed by PLA , they are using tibetans to hold the land . why do u think we are begging them in talks to leave ?
Not UPA era but since 1962.
where was LAC in depsang ?
read this news article and what parliamentary committee had to say
"Defence Secretary Shashi Kant Sharma and senior defence ministry officials appeared before a parliamentary committee to give details of the incursion."
"They told the panel that Chinese troops had intruded 19 km deep inside Indian territory in Depsang in Ladakh region and pitched tents. They also said that efforts are underway to ensure that the status quo is maintained, informed sources said."
2013 intrusion at raki was 19km inside India , where does that put the LAC ?
depsang bulge used ot be at worst a grey zone patrolled by both sides , now its under control of PLA .
Lol what boat pier ? What are these twisted stories coming from ?
we had a old dock with boats at f2 , boats were removed before disengagement . and never came back
View attachment 10512
View attachment 10513
Hello Print Bhaiya, softie editorials bhi tum likho aur softie hone ka feedback tum hi lekar aao. Chit bhi tumhari pat bhi tumhari"Discussions within Chinese media often exhibit an air of arrogance regarding India’s potential as a manufacturing alternative to China. Analysts remain sceptical about India’s ability to serve as a viable substitute in the economic sphere. Many argue that India will struggle to surpass China or replicate its achievements over the past three decades within a similar timeframe, citing significant challenges in advancing its manufacturing capabilities."
"Chinese analysts observe that Indian media increasingly reflects optimism about Sino-Indian negotiations, likely influenced by India’s current economic situation. The discourse is stuck between the idea that India will never be able to catch up with China and the belief that China should not help its adversary’s rise."
"While Beijing has long urged New Delhi to focus on issues beyond the border dispute, the current narrative suggesting consistent disengagement by China—while portraying India as eager to adjust its stance for commercial interests—appears disingenuous. This effort seems designed to distract from underlying issues and points of contention, while also fostering a false narrative that India is going soft on China."
Chinese are seeing India as going soft. Talk of ‘consensus’ over disengagement rings hollow
A review of Chinese media and social platforms reveals a widespread perception that India has adopted a more conciliatory approach towards China.theprint.in