About Transnistria, this is my guess. There are no official statements.
What does it mean "to fight on three sides"? Transnistria does not have sufficient military force to organize a worthy rebuff. But we are solving a hypothetical threat to Odesa.
I have already said this: Technically, invading Transnistria is not a problem. A narrow strip of land on our bank of the Dniester is shot through by our artillery. All that is needed is a political solution, but there is none yet.
Stop reading selectively. I have already said - Ukraine does not lay claim to foreign lands. This region will return to Moldova when it is ready to take it under its control. But what a slap in the face for Russia.
All the rest of your words are drunken delirium. If you adore Putin, then you should listen to him from the beginning. Just 9 months ago he spoke about 617 thousand of his troops in Ukraine. He lied as usual, but these are his words.
I wonder why you are doing your homework so badly? One shows me pictures of a destroyed Abrams from the Donetsk direction. Another talks about empty numbers. Putin has not had a professional army since September 2022. We defeated it. Since that time, he has been fighting with numbers (as always in Russian history). That is why I do not keep track of how many soldiers he has now. I look at the availability of military equipment. He is running out of it. March battalions will appear soon. In the WW2, miners from Donbass defended Odessa with the help of sapper shovels and hand grenades. In WW1, such units were issued axes and also hand grenades.
This is a video where a Ukrainian MiG shoots down a moped with the help of an R-73, which was supposed to target a weak internal combustion engine, the gunfire is even closer.
View: https://x.com/Voice1288291/status/1830001185149079750