Russian Ukrainian War

[craigs]

Now Bob Woodward's new book "War" has come out, where he mentions how Putler waved an atomic bomb in the fall of 2022 to avoid the shame of defeat and partners slowed down the supply of weapons.
View attachment 13032

Who is Bo Woodward? Deepthroat?

 

[Akim]

Who is Bo Woodward? Deepthroat?

I don't know him that well.
There is a book that confirms my words, expressed earlier. This opinion of mine is formed not so much on my view, but also on the opinions of other people. Whether you believe him or not is your decision. Your opinion or the opinion of the Canadian emigrant @GaudaNaresh will not change anything here. There will be no less in the back of my pickup: batteries, mobile solar panels, components for military pickups, thermal underwear, etc.
We are all on the verge of a tectonic fracture in the political sphere of the world. It's just that now you have the opportunity to write your skepticism. Perhaps you will soon change your mind.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

I don't know him that well.
There is a book that confirms my words, expressed earlier. This opinion of mine is formed not so much on my view, but also on the opinions of other people. Whether you believe him or not is your decision. Your opinion or the opinion of the Canadian emigrant @GaudaNaresh will not change anything here. There will be no less in the back of my pickup: batteries, mobile solar panels, components for military pickups, thermal underwear, etc.
We are all on the verge of a tectonic fracture in the political sphere of the world. It's just that now you have the opportunity to write your skepticism. Perhaps you will soon change your mind.

Your bullshit avoidance of objective facts that our predictions are more accurate about this war, as testified by the timestamp of the blog, wont change anything, nazi lover.

Run away from the fact that your nazi lover president officially honoured a nazi like the scum your country is.

 

[Akim]

Your bullshit avoidance of objective facts that our predictions are more accurate about this war, as testified by the timestamp of the blog, wont change anything, nazi lover.

Run away from the fact that your nazi lover president officially honoured a nazi like the scum your country is.

English is not my native language, but I can tell you to go to hellmomy or even further away in our language. We have established that you are a f**king immigrant, a stupid racist and a fascist loser. I am not interested in communicating with you. Welcome to the ignore list.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

English is not my native language, but I can tell you to go to hellmomy or even further away in our language. We have established that you are a f**king immigrant, a stupid racist and a fascist loser. I am not interested in communicating with you. Welcome to the ignore list.

The fascist lover is you, given you are defending the fascist who is the leader of your country who came to my country's parliament to officially honour a nazi war criminal, that he PRAISED for fighting against russia with the germans in ww2.
You are not interested, because you are a ukronazi propaganda peddler without balls.
The roos clearly chopped those off.

 

[Akim]

Уймите этого ебанного пидора, а то он завафлял тут все своим обконченным хлебалом. Гандон штопанный!

 

[GaudaNaresh]

Уймите этого ебанного пидора, а то он завафлял тут все своим обконченным хлебалом. Гандон штопанный!

I thought you were gonna put me on ignore, Nazi fascist-lover. Keep running from your nazi-honouring President like a typical Ukro-pussy.

 

[Soldier35]

Footage of real combat work of Russian interceptor drones armed with the Taiga net launcher. The military chronicle was filmed near the village of Kleshcheyevka in the Donetsk region, now this is the largest archive of interceptor drones that has been published online. The interceptor drones are used by the anti-aircraft missile battery, the 1442nd motorized rifle regiment, the 6th motorized rifle division, and the 3rd army corps. It is reported that thanks to the use of drones with the Taiga device, it was possible to gain a tactical advantage in this area and the activity of Ukrainian drones decreased to almost zero.

It is worth noting that the Taiga device was already copied in September and is also being produced in Ukraine, it intercepted 5 drones of the Russian army. There are also American analogues, they were shown earlier. In the drone war, and this can already be called that, with the help of the Taiga net thrower, 470 Ukrainian drones worth 130 million rubles were intercepted, mainly drones manufactured by DJI, and 9 agrodrones of the Baba Yaga type were also intercepted. Currently, drones armed with nets are the most effective means of combating drones, since effective electronic warfare systems that cover all frequencies have not yet been created. Judging by the information from the network, the Taiga net thrower is manufactured by the Russian company INMATTEN, surprisingly, against the background of current prices for military products, it is quite cheap, its price is 25,000 rubles or $ 258. The weight of the Taiga device is 270/350 g, depending on the type of net.

The drone with the Taiga net turned out to be successful, thanks to the interaction of Russian developers with military personnel. Which does not happen often. The Taiga net launcher is simple, essentially it is a pyrotechnic cartridge and a net that is attached to a drone, so far only to DJI drones. The drone hovers over another drone and the pyrotechnic cartridge shoots a net with weights, the net has a diameter of 3.6 meters, thus intercepting the drone. Intercepted drones are then picked up and repaired, it is worth noting that DJI drones are quite expensive. In the video, an overview of the Taiga device and its combat use in Ukraine.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZ66HEtacX0

 

[WW2historian]

I don't know him that well.
There is a book that confirms my words, expressed earlier. This opinion of mine is formed not so much on my view, but also on the opinions of other people. Whether you believe him or not is your decision. Your opinion or the opinion of the Canadian emigrant @GaudaNaresh will not change anything here. There will be no less in the back of my pickup: batteries, mobile solar panels, components for military pickups, thermal underwear, etc.
We are all on the verge of a tectonic fracture in the political sphere of the world. It's just that now you have the opportunity to write your skepticism. Perhaps you will soon change your mind.

What would have to happen for Ukraine to surrender? Or what would convince Ukrainians that the war is lost and it's time to give up? Despite US senators saying that Ukraine will fight to the last person, I don't think that's the case.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsI6rh4nbbE

 

[shade2]

What would have to happen for Ukraine to surrender? Or what would convince Ukrainians that the war is lost and it's time to give up? Despite US senators saying that Ukraine will fight to the last person, I don't think that's the case.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsI6rh4nbbE

They will indeed fight to the last plebean.
Because Ukraine currently isn't a sovereign country, i would commend them if they were one and yet they had this "never surrender" mindset.

ofc the current "never surrender" "retake everything from Crimea to Donbass" is a creation of the post
EuroMaidan regime for US interests which is to "bleed Russia", the hope is that this will create fertile ground for an anti-Putin color revolution, their copium for this is that Putin should be forced to do a general draft, and the average Muscovite will come out to protest and overthrow Putin and purge his siloviki buddies.

Maybe this will happen, maybe it won't but till then Ukranis of both civilian and military variants will be casualties of the war

Anyway for the State Dept bureaucrats who designed this whole scheme, there is no failure condition to the "bleed Russia" project, there are only good, better and best outcomes.

We are currently at the (((good))) outcome where Russian men are turned into fertilizer, Russia is sanctioned and European armories are being emptied of Cold War museum pieces which are donated to Ukraine, and replaced by fresh American or less likely, European hardware.

I wish in the future an analysis comes out about how Ukranian public mindset towards "fellow brother tribe Russians" was changed from 2014 to just before the invasion.
ofc a lot of this mindset change is itself from the stupid Russian invasion.

 

[WW2historian]

What would have to happen for Ukraine to surrender? Or what would convince Ukrainians that the war is lost and it's time to give up? Despite US senators saying that Ukraine will fight to the last person, I don't think that's the case.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsI6rh4nbbE

Lindsey Graham also wants Ukraine to lower age requirement to perhaps 18 years of age.

Lindsey Graham, visiting Kyiv, urges Ukraine to pass mobilization law​

“I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe it’s at 27,” he told reporters Monday. “You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving — not at 25 or 27.”
“We need more people in the line,” he said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/18/lindsey-graham-visiting-kyiv-urges-ukraine-pass-mobilization-law/

 

[craigs]

I don't know him that well.
There is a book that confirms my words, expressed earlier. This opinion of mine is formed not so much on my view, but also on the opinions of other people. Whether you believe him or not is your decision. Your opinion or the opinion of the Canadian emigrant @GaudaNaresh will not change anything here. There will be no less in the back of my pickup: batteries, mobile solar panels, components for military pickups, thermal underwear, etc.
We are all on the verge of a tectonic fracture in the political sphere of the world. It's just that now you have the opportunity to write your skepticism. Perhaps you will soon change your mind.

Post quotes from people you know well, not random CIA mouthpieces.

 

[craigs]

Lindsey Graham also wants Ukraine to lower age requirement to perhaps 18 years of age.

Lindsey Graham, visiting Kyiv, urges Ukraine to pass mobilization law​

“I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe it’s at 27,” he told reporters Monday. “You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving — not at 25 or 27.”
“We need more people in the line,” he said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/18/lindsey-graham-visiting-kyiv-urges-ukraine-pass-mobilization-law/

Why stop at 18? Why not go ahead and create a whole Zellejugend regiment right now.

 

[Akim]

What would have to happen for Ukraine to surrender? Or what would convince Ukrainians that the war is lost and it's time to give up? Despite US senators saying that Ukraine will fight to the last person, I don't think that's the case.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsI6rh4nbbE

We need to convince Ukrainian society that further resistance is useless. It was you and everyone else from the outside who were convinced that everything is bad here, but not us. We are quite capable of resisting. I am writing here - that means there is electricity and I will definitely spend my last money on food for my family and cat rather than on the Internet.

 

[WW2historian]

We need to convince Ukrainian society that further resistance is useless. It was you and everyone else from the outside who were convinced that everything is bad here, but not us. We are quite capable of resisting. I am writing here - that means there is electricity and I will definitely spend my last money on food for my family and cat rather than on the Internet.

I think Ukraine society should realize that it's a strong possibility that things can get a lot worse and it's better to surrender now then wait. It's a hypothetical question, so it would have to be very bad situation for Ukraine. I believe you that currently things are not even close to that point right now, but things change. Although most Ukrainians are not fighting on the front lines where things are much worse than places like Odessa.

 

[Akim]

I think Ukraine society should realize that it's a strong possibility that things can get a lot worse and it's better to surrender now then wait. It's a hypothetical question, so it would have to be very bad situation for Ukraine. I believe you that currently things are not even close to that point right now, but things change. Although most Ukrainians are not fighting on the front lines where things are much worse than places like Odessa.

You can even live in Zaporizhzhya and Kharkiv and other cities where gliding bombs fly, but Russian artillery does not reach. Bombs and missiles create only localized destruction.
It's like "Russian roulette" - will you be lucky or not.
I repeat: the enemy does have tactical successes, but they do not change the overall picture. We see more. From the outside, they only see secondary signs. Sometimes, for some reason, they do not pay attention to them. For example, in Kazan for BRICS, everyone was advised to come with cash, because there are no international payment systems. or, although Russia has increased its defense industry, the number of new Su-34/35 is constantly decreasing.
Have you ever heard of our use of JSOW? Although GBU-39, JDAM, HAMMER are regularly used. They are converted into cruise missiles. The proportion of Russian/Ukrainian artillery rounds has decreased from 1:7 to 1:2 in favor of the Russians. This is only for a year. At the beginning of the war it was 1:30. They were shooting 24/7. Dictatorial regimes always start well, but lose in the marathon. Do you know about the increasing number of F-16s? Starting from the beginning of next year, Mirage 2000-5 will be delivered, they will complement our Su-24s (the F-16 cannot use European weapons).
All this adds up to a pile of facts and our society does not despair.

 

[Boiled_AnDa]

Mobilization is never voluntary. It is a violent compulsion of men/women to defend their country. People are all different. Some are simply afraid. So there are no crowds willing to defend their country. Such crowds were in the first days of the war. Now it is mostly voluntary-compulsory - by summons.

If I today kidnap you and force you to do my commanded works, however unwilling you might be, you will do as I command in fear of life. But the moment you find any chance to flee, you will do flee at the very first moment you capture to utilise that to your sought freedom. Won't you?

Same happening to the most of the crowd caught by force dragging inside a van, they are not voluntarily going, rather unwillingly forced to go.. Result, you have manyfold desertion increased within an year.

For example, in Kazan for BRICS, everyone was advised to come with cash, because there are no international payment systems

Reference link please?

Dictatorial regimes always start well, but lose in the marathon

Elected Putin of Russia or Under Zelensky's Marshal Law Ukraine ?

Ever wonder how Russia is getting more and more information about weapon platform deployment or movements? Its the locals or moles who are providing them with the input ( just like some russians doing same for ukrainians), but, the rate has gained considerable high pace in last some months. Does not that show some elevated level of distrust among peasants towards the chair wielder ?

FPV drones with RPG7 head or a VOG ned is way more effective, accurate, cost effective and can work as a guided missile as well as a surveillance drone than 1000$ each 155mm/152 mm shells added 4 min member crew, maintenance , barrel wear-out after 700 rds... too much headache... So, FPV now adds more to battle of attrocities than shells.. hence, no wonder both sides now decreasing shell use to FPV attacks.

 

[WW2historian]

You can even live in Zaporizhzhya and Kharkiv and other cities where gliding bombs fly, but Russian artillery does not reach. Bombs and missiles create only localized destruction.
It's like "Russian roulette" - will you be lucky or not.
I repeat: the enemy does have tactical successes, but they do not change the overall picture. We see more. From the outside, they only see secondary signs. Sometimes, for some reason, they do not pay attention to them. For example, in Kazan for BRICS, everyone was advised to come with cash, because there are no international payment systems. or, although Russia has increased its defense industry, the number of new Su-34/35 is constantly decreasing.
Have you ever heard of our use of JSOW? Although GBU-39, JDAM, HAMMER are regularly used. They are converted into cruise missiles. The proportion of Russian/Ukrainian artillery rounds has decreased from 1:7 to 1:2 in favor of the Russians. This is only for a year. At the beginning of the war it was 1:30. They were shooting 24/7. Dictatorial regimes always start well, but lose in the marathon. Do you know about the increasing number of F-16s? Starting from the beginning of next year, Mirage 2000-5 will be delivered, they will complement our Su-24s (the F-16 cannot use European weapons).
All this adds up to a pile of facts and our society does not despair.

The difference between tactical and strategic success is tactics are short term goals. Russia's long term strategy is to kill or wound every Ukrainian willing to fight. They are achieving this everyday. It's just a matter of how long it will take. Putin is in this for as long as it takes, everything I've seen points to that. Zelensky thinks he can win this in a year. Which one's plan is the most realistic?

 

[Akim]

If I today kidnap you and force you to do my commanded works, however unwilling you might be, you will do as I command in fear of life. But the moment you find any chance to flee, you will do flee at the very first moment you capture to utilise that to your sought freedom. Won't you?

Same happening to the most of the crowd caught by force dragging inside a van, they are not voluntarily going, rather unwillingly forced to go.. Result, you have manyfold desertion increased within an year.

Reference link please?

Elected Putin of Russia or Under Zelensky's Marshal Law Ukraine ?

Ever wonder how Russia is getting more and more information about weapon platform deployment or movements? Its the locals or moles who are providing them with the input ( just like some russians doing same for ukrainians), but, the rate has gained considerable high pace in last some months. Does not that show some elevated level of distrust among peasants towards the chair wielder ?

FPV drones with RPG7 head or a VOG ned is way more effective, accurate, cost effective and can work as a guided missile as well as a surveillance drone than 1000$ each 155mm/152 mm shells added 4 min member crew, maintenance , barrel wear-out after 700 rds... too much headache... So, FPV now adds more to battle of attrocities than shells.. hence, no wonder both sides now decreasing shell use to FPV attacks.

We've already talked about dragging into a minibus. 500 videos. At least 200. You'll be able to find a hundred. But no, like crazy people they'll repeat the story of the broken gramophone.
FPV doesn't produce as many fragments as a shell. One FPV - one target, if the shell hits a crowd, everyone will fall.
Shooting with an FPV at a reinforced concrete shelter is like shooting from a rifle at a tank, a 152/155 mm shell crushes it.
FPV can replace ATGMs, but they complement artillery.

 

[Akim]

The difference between tactical and strategic success is tactics are short term goals. Russia's long term strategy is to kill or wound every Ukrainian willing to fight. They are achieving this everyday. It's just a matter of how long it will take. Putin is in this for as long as it takes, everything I've seen points to that. Zelensky thinks he can win this in a year. Which one's plan is the most realistic?

North Korean soldiers will tell you.