Tracking Indian Judiciary: News, Updates & Discussions

[ArjunMK1A]

Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.

Few days Madras High court simply refused to follow an Supreme court order of investigating an Rapist since he is connected to the ruling party.

Looks like within the courts there seems to be contradictory messages going on. Judges were more or less corrupted and have baap attitude. Common people will avoid court for an reason due to the level of corruption going in lower sessions courts.

 

[Azaad]

Meet Kshipra & Shiv Shankar: Dalit Researchers Who Won ₹127 Crore Compensation in India's First Intellectual Property Case Under Caste Atrocities Act

Nagpur- Imagine someone who has never studied law or stepped inside a courtroom, suddenly becoming a party in a case—representing themselves, arguing not just f

en.themooknayak.com

2 Delete researchers win a landmark INR 127 crores compensation by Milaudas of the SC to be paid by the Govt of Maharashtra in a precedent setting case for loss of IPR under the Prevention of Atrocities of SC/ST Act. How is that possible you ask ? Read on .

Alhamdulillah !