Tracking Indian Judiciary: News, Updates & Discussions

[ArjunMK1A]

Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.

Few days Madras High court simply refused to follow an Supreme court order of investigating an Rapist since he is connected to the ruling party.

Looks like within the courts there seems to be contradictory messages going on. Judges were more or less corrupted and have baap attitude. Common people will avoid court for an reason due to the level of corruption going in lower sessions courts.

 

[Azaad]

Meet Kshipra & Shiv Shankar: Dalit Researchers Who Won ₹127 Crore Compensation in India's First Intellectual Property Case Under Caste Atrocities Act

Nagpur- Imagine someone who has never studied law or stepped inside a courtroom, suddenly becoming a party in a case—representing themselves, arguing not just f

en.themooknayak.com

2 Delete researchers win a landmark INR 127 crores compensation by Milaudas of the SC to be paid by the Govt of Maharashtra in a precedent setting case for loss of IPR under the Prevention of Atrocities of SC/ST Act. How is that possible you ask ? Read on .

Alhamdulillah !

 

[vampyrbladez]

These retards want US like madness here in India

No child will be discriminated against: Supreme Court on plea for Rohingya access to public schools

No child will be discriminated against in education, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday (February 12, 2025) while fixing for next week a plea seeking a direction to the Centre and the Delhi governments to grant Rohingya refugees in the city access to public schools and hospitals.

The court just wants to know where these Rohingya families are living, in whose house and what are their particulars, a Bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh said while making the the no discrimination in education point.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...ools-to-rohingya-refugees/article69210269.ece

 

[Azaad]

These retards want US like madness here in India

No child will be discriminated against: Supreme Court on plea for Rohingya access to public schools



https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...ools-to-rohingya-refugees/article69210269.ece

This can also be a double edged sword. Most of the Rohingyas can be tracked thru this mechanism if the GoI is smart about it. Then again this is assuming the GoI & the Courts aren't acting in tandem.

 

[DingDong]

indian men to keep a watch on wife's activities, else additional members will have to be added to his ration card.

Man remains legal father of child born out of wife’s adultery: Supreme Court | Kochi News - The Times of India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that in cases where a marriage subsists and spouses have access to each other, the husband remains the legal father o

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.

Laws don't protect the individuals. Laws are meant to protect the society and prevent destitution. Rights of the institutions and the society take precedence over the rights of an individual. The law and the court are correct in this case, even it costs the "husband" a bit.

 

[sameer]

https://www.aninews.in/news/national/politics/brazen-violations-of-sc-orders-owaisi-on-gujarat-govt-demolishing-illegal-structures-in-dwarka20250127112145/

https://kmsnews.org/kms/2025/02/08/indian-authorities-demolish-mosques-shrines-among-36-structures-in-gujarat.html

BTW, it seems that orders passed by our esteemed Miyalards on demolitions last year weren’t followed here in recent Gujarat bulldozer actions.

 

[Azaad]

Laws don't protect the individuals. Laws are meant to protect the society and prevent destitution. Rights of the institutions and the society take precedence over the rights of an individual. The law and the court are correct in this case, even it costs the "husband" a bit.

The courts went about & decriminalized adultery. This was the next logical step. Both these moves were aimed at benefiting individuals not society as a whole . OTOH infidelity is grounds for divorce.

Besides in that particular case you're referring to the paternity test was withheld because the person accused of fathering the kid wasn't co operating & the SC held that questioning the paternity of the child will stigmatize the child in the eyes of the world.

Hence it is the legally wed husband who's NOT the biological father who will have to bear expenses to raise the child. Quite obviously his rights don't matter .

I call this andher nagari chaupat raja.

 

[Azaad]

MP Iqra Choudhary Approaches Supreme Court Seeking Strict Implementation Of Places Of Worship Act

Samajwadi Party leader and Member of Parliament, Iqra Choudhary has filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court seeking implementation of the Places of Worship Act 1991.The bench of CJI Sanijiv...

www.livelaw.in

Miyabhai version of what's mine is mine , what's yours is negotiable.

Alhamdulillah !

 

[Azaad]

View: https://twitter.com/UnSubtleDesi/status/1890255522810720699?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/UnSubtleDesi/status/1890264509270602044?s=19

I refuse to believe that only OpIndia saw the pattern in what Umar Khalid and Kapil Sibal were trying to do. Everyone saw it. Everyone knew. In fact, law portals which are close to Sibal knew EXACTLY what was going on. Why did they keep quiet? Why did they not report this? In truth, law portals and MSM aren't reporting the truth - they are complicit in its subversion by Jihadis who wanted to teach Kafirs a lesson during Delhi anti-Hindu Riots. They are complicit in the conspiracy.

There is a reason why law portals abstained from reporting the District Court proceedings in the Umar Khalid bail hearing after the application was withdrawn from SC. I was there. The names of AltNews, Swara Bhaskar and several others emerged. I refuse to believe that it was a coincidence. They KNEW and they deliberately stayed away because they were instructed to subvert the truth.

The law portals and the MSM work to obfuscate the truth for the public so the elite - those like Kapil Sibal - can peddle their agenda, in an attempt to save those who murdered Hindus. That is that. That is the truth.

Burkha gets her fat arse kicked again, this time by the ex CJI. That apart, what's clear is the way senior advocates game the system. Sibal sought repeated adjournments coz he wasn't sure of a favourable outcome namely bail for his client Umer Khalid & while you can seek innumerable adjournments, you can't exactly keep putting up bail applications before the SC. This is one area which needs legislative intervention.

 

[Miss Firing]

Bombay High Court grants bail to man booked for raping minor girl

Bombay High Court announced that the girl had a consensual relationship with the perpetrator and was aware of her actions. | OpIndia News

www.opindia.com

**

Man is now 24

Girl is now 14.

The "relationship" started 2 years back when girl was 12.

**

No further comments.

 

[Azaad]

View attachment 25749

Bombay High Court grants bail to man booked for raping minor girl

Bombay High Court announced that the girl had a consensual relationship with the perpetrator and was aware of her actions. | OpIndia News

www.opindia.com

**

Man is now 24

Girl is now 14.

The "relationship" started 2 years back when girl was 12.

**

No further comments.

Case of lazy reporting or worse sensationalism . At the time of the incident , the victim was 14 BUT the accused was 19. Here's the information from the very article buried deep inside it.

The culprit, who was caught in 2019 at the age of 19, had already served more than five years, two months, and twenty-three days in prison, which was also considered by the court before granting him bail under certain conditions including “bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount.”

HC will take into account the fact that the accused has already spent 5 years & a few months behind bars . IIRC the minimum sentence for the charges are 10 years. He's already spent half that time behind bars. If he's smart & lucky in the sense that the girl's not married off & is willing he can marry the same girl .

The court's are then liable to dismiss the case though having said that , it's not the rule.